diff options
author | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> | 2025-03-07 14:09:21 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> | 2025-03-24 17:29:58 -0700 |
commit | 35d13f841a3d8159ef20d5e32a9ed3faa27875bc (patch) | |
tree | 7e74ba189ac9aae61c1a6d51ce96ca776feacec3 | |
parent | 9daa05c84a27629577287897af4fcf19c238796a (diff) |
perf bpf-filter: Fix a parsing error with comma
The previous change to support cgroup filters introduced a bug that
pathname can include commas. It confused the lexer to treat an item and
the trailing comma as a single token. And it resulted in a parse error:
$ sudo perf record -e cycles:P --filter 'period > 0, ip > 64' -- true
perf_bpf_filter: Error: Unexpected item: 0,
perf_bpf_filter: syntax error, unexpected BFT_ERROR, expecting BFT_NUM
Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
--filter <filter>
event filter
It should get "0" and "," separately.
An easiest fix would be to remove "," from the possible pathname
characters. As it's for cgroup names, probably ok to assume it won't
have commas in the pathname.
I found that the existing BPF filtering test didn't have any complex
filter condition with commas. Let's update the group filter test which
is supposed to test filter combinations like this.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307220922.434319-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Fixes: 91e88437d5156b20 ("perf bpf-filter: Support filtering on cgroups")
Reported-by: Sally Shi <sshii@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
-rwxr-xr-x | tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l | 2 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh index 1b58ccc1fd88..4d6c3c1b7fb9 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ test_bpf_filter_fail() { test_bpf_filter_group() { echo "Group bpf-filter test" - if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'period > 1000 || ip > 0' \ + if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'period > 1000, ip > 0' \ -o /dev/null true 2>/dev/null then echo "Group bpf-filter test [Failed should succeed]" @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ test_bpf_filter_group() { return fi - if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'cpu > 0 || ip > 0' \ + if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'period > 1000 , cpu > 0 || ip > 0' \ -o /dev/null true 2>&1 | grep -q PERF_SAMPLE_CPU then echo "Group bpf-filter test [Failed forbidden CPU]" diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l index f313404f95a9..6aa65ade3385 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int path_or_error(void) num_dec [0-9]+ num_hex 0[Xx][0-9a-fA-F]+ space [ \t]+ -path [^ \t\n]+ +path [^ \t\n,]+ ident [_a-zA-Z][_a-zA-Z0-9]+ %% |