Merge tag 'net-5.19-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

Pull networking fixes from Paolo Abeni:
 "Including fixes from bpf, netfilter, can, and bluetooth.

  Current release - regressions:

   - bluetooth: fix deadlock on hci_power_on_sync

  Previous releases - regressions:

   - sched: act_police: allow 'continue' action offload

   - eth: usbnet: fix memory leak in error case

   - eth: ibmvnic: properly dispose of all skbs during a failover

  Previous releases - always broken:

   - bpf:
       - fix insufficient bounds propagation from
         adjust_scalar_min_max_vals
       - clear page contiguity bit when unmapping pool

   - netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: release elements in clone from
     abort path

   - mptcp: netlink: issue MP_PRIO signals from userspace PMs

   - can:
       - rcar_canfd: fix data transmission failed on R-Car V3U
       - gs_usb: gs_usb_open/close(): fix memory leak

  Misc:

   - add Wenjia as SMC maintainer"

* tag 'net-5.19-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (57 commits)
  wireguard: Kconfig: select CRYPTO_CHACHA_S390
  crypto: s390 - do not depend on CRYPTO_HW for SIMD implementations
  wireguard: selftests: use microvm on x86
  wireguard: selftests: always call kernel makefile
  wireguard: selftests: use virt machine on m68k
  wireguard: selftests: set fake real time in init
  r8169: fix accessing unset transport header
  net: rose: fix UAF bug caused by rose_t0timer_expiry
  usbnet: fix memory leak in error case
  Revert "tls: rx: move counting TlsDecryptErrors for sync"
  mptcp: update MIB_RMSUBFLOW in cmd_sf_destroy
  mptcp: fix local endpoint accounting
  selftests: mptcp: userspace PM support for MP_PRIO signals
  mptcp: netlink: issue MP_PRIO signals from userspace PMs
  mptcp: Acquire the subflow socket lock before modifying MP_PRIO flags
  mptcp: Avoid acquiring PM lock for subflow priority changes
  mptcp: fix locking in mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy()
  net/mlx5e: Fix matchall police parameters validation
  net/sched: act_police: allow 'continue' action offload
  net: lan966x: hardcode the number of external ports
  ...

1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index c456b5225d66..d14007081595 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -6,6 +6,15 @@
 netdev FAQ
 ==========
 
+tl;dr
+-----
+
+ - designate your patch to a tree - ``[PATCH net]`` or ``[PATCH net-next]``
+ - for fixes the ``Fixes:`` tag is required, regardless of the tree
+ - don't post large series (> 15 patches), break them up
+ - don't repost your patches within one 24h period
+ - reverse xmas tree
+
 What is netdev?
 ---------------
 It is a mailing list for all network-related Linux stuff.  This
@@ -136,6 +145,20 @@ it to the maintainer to figure out what is the most recent and current
 version that should be applied. If there is any doubt, the maintainer
 will reply and ask what should be done.
 
+How do I divide my work into patches?
+-------------------------------------
+
+Put yourself in the shoes of the reviewer. Each patch is read separately
+and therefore should constitute a comprehensible step towards your stated
+goal.
+
+Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes longer
+to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they find a large
+chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a short time, so Maintainers
+just do it. As a result, a sequence of smaller series gets merged quicker and
+with better review coverage. Re-posting large series also increases the mailing
+list traffic.
+
 I made changes to only a few patches in a patch series should I resend only those changed?
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 No, please resend the entire patch series and make sure you do number your
@@ -183,6 +206,19 @@ it is requested that you make it look like this::
    * another line of text
    */
 
+What is "reverse xmas tree"?
+----------------------------
+
+Netdev has a convention for ordering local variables in functions.
+Order the variable declaration lines longest to shortest, e.g.::
+
+  struct scatterlist *sg;
+  struct sk_buff *skb;
+  int err, i;
+
+If there are dependencies between the variables preventing the ordering
+move the initialization out of line.
+
 I am working in existing code which uses non-standard formatting. Which formatting should I use?
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Make your code follow the most recent guidelines, so that eventually all code