summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>2021-03-01 17:36:53 +1100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2021-05-19 10:12:58 +0200
commit6289b028b5e21974b1761206d4c49d88a766a5af (patch)
tree96819dfd69fd36b492c95a9ebe7757b43e1a5fa4 /arch
parentbece6aea3653729d517299f9c5e83bf7d23319cd (diff)
powerpc/iommu: Annotate nested lock for lockdep
[ Upstream commit cc7130bf119add37f36238343a593b71ef6ecc1e ] The IOMMU table is divided into pools for concurrent mappings and each pool has a separate spinlock. When taking the ownership of an IOMMU group to pass through a device to a VM, we lock these spinlocks which triggers a false negative warning in lockdep (below). This fixes it by annotating the large pool's spinlock as a nest lock which makes lockdep not complaining when locking nested locks if the nest lock is locked already. === WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.11.0-le_syzkaller_a+fstn1 #100 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- qemu-system-ppc/4129 is trying to acquire lock: c0000000119bddb0 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 but task is already holding lock: c0000000119bdd30 (&(p->lock)/1){....}-{2:2}, at: iommu_take_ownership+0xac/0x1e0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(p->lock)/1); lock(&(p->lock)/1); === Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301063653.51003-1-aik@ozlabs.ru Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
index 5b69a6a72a0e..6806eefa52ce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ int iommu_take_ownership(struct iommu_table *tbl)
spin_lock_irqsave(&tbl->large_pool.lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < tbl->nr_pools; i++)
- spin_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock);
+ spin_lock_nest_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock, &tbl->large_pool.lock);
iommu_table_release_pages(tbl);
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ void iommu_release_ownership(struct iommu_table *tbl)
spin_lock_irqsave(&tbl->large_pool.lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < tbl->nr_pools; i++)
- spin_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock);
+ spin_lock_nest_lock(&tbl->pools[i].lock, &tbl->large_pool.lock);
memset(tbl->it_map, 0, sz);