block: loop: set discard granularity and alignment for block device backed loop

commit bcb21c8cc9947286211327d663ace69f07d37a76 upstream.

In case of block device backend, if the backend supports write zeros, the
loop device will set queue flag of QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD. However,
limits.discard_granularity isn't setup, and this way is wrong,
see the following description in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block:

	A discard_granularity of 0 means that the device does not support
	discard functionality.

Especially 9b15d109a6b2 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in
__blkdev_issue_discard()") starts to take q->limits.discard_granularity
for computing max discard sectors. And zero discard granularity may cause
kernel oops, or fail discard request even though the loop queue claims
discard support via QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD.

Fix the issue by setup discard granularity and alignment.

Fixes: c52abf563049 ("loop: Better discard support for block devices")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index da68c42aed68..19042b42a8ba 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
+	u32 granularity, max_discard_sectors;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the backing device is a block device, mirror its zeroing
@@ -876,11 +877,10 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 		struct request_queue *backingq;
 
 		backingq = bdev_get_queue(inode->i_bdev);
-		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q,
-			backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
 
-		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q,
-			backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
+		max_discard_sectors = backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors;
+		granularity = backingq->limits.discard_granularity ?:
+			queue_physical_block_size(backingq);
 
 	/*
 	 * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the
@@ -889,23 +889,26 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 	 * useful information.
 	 */
 	} else if (!file->f_op->fallocate || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
-		q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
-		q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
-		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
-		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
+		max_discard_sectors = 0;
+		granularity = 0;
 
 	} else {
-		q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
-		q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
-
-		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
+		max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9;
+		granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
 	}
 
-	if (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors)
+	if (max_discard_sectors) {
+		q->limits.discard_granularity = granularity;
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors);
+		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, max_discard_sectors);
 		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
-	else
+	} else {
+		q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
+		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
 		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
+	}
+	q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
 }
 
 static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)