summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2022-09-15 20:25:47 -0400
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2022-11-25 13:01:55 -0500
commitde4eda9de2d957ef2d6a8365a01e26a435e958cb (patch)
tree49b0d60dedb65af7f0d3e874ee9c661e6b09697b /fs/afs/rxrpc.c
parenta41dad905e5a388f88435a517de102e9b2c8e43d (diff)
use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializerspull-iov_iter
READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are "data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as "we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly the wrong way. Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder to misinterpret... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/afs/rxrpc.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/afs/rxrpc.c10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index eccc3cd0cb70..c62939e5ea1f 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ void afs_make_call(struct afs_addr_cursor *ac, struct afs_call *call, gfp_t gfp)
msg.msg_name = NULL;
msg.msg_namelen = 0;
- iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 1, call->request_size);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iov, 1, call->request_size);
msg.msg_control = NULL;
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = MSG_WAITALL | (call->write_iter ? MSG_MORE : 0);
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ error_do_abort:
RX_USER_ABORT, ret, "KSD");
} else {
len = 0;
- iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, READ, NULL, 0, 0);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_DEST, NULL, 0, 0);
rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket, rxcall,
&msg.msg_iter, &len, false,
&call->abort_code, &call->service_id);
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
) {
if (state == AFS_CALL_SV_AWAIT_ACK) {
len = 0;
- iov_iter_kvec(&call->def_iter, READ, NULL, 0, 0);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&call->def_iter, ITER_DEST, NULL, 0, 0);
ret = rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(call->net->socket,
call->rxcall, &call->def_iter,
&len, false, &remote_abort,
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ void afs_send_empty_reply(struct afs_call *call)
msg.msg_name = NULL;
msg.msg_namelen = 0;
- iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, NULL, 0, 0);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, NULL, 0, 0);
msg.msg_control = NULL;
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = 0;
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
iov[0].iov_len = len;
msg.msg_name = NULL;
msg.msg_namelen = 0;
- iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 1, len);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iov, 1, len);
msg.msg_control = NULL;
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = 0;