summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>2019-03-11 17:28:03 +0530
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-05-31 06:43:48 -0700
commite8cfc3265cdce02a8c26b734b1b2d6b1368f04ba (patch)
treed92a6264b329a8eeca6de41b0f281636171e32f5 /include
parentf618b46f9d282e5d00b197df60e98dbe8c1d6673 (diff)
rcu: Do a single rhp->func read in rcu_head_after_call_rcu()
[ Upstream commit b699cce1604e828f19c39845252626eb78cdf38a ] The rcu_head_after_call_rcu() function reads the rhp->func pointer twice, which can result in a false-positive WARN_ON_ONCE() if the callback were passed to call_rcu() between the two reads. Although racing rcu_head_after_call_rcu() with call_rcu() is to be a dubious use case (the return value is not reliable in that case), intermittent and irreproducible warnings are also quite dubious. This commit therefore uses a single READ_ONCE() to pick up the value of rhp->func once, then tests that value twice, thus guaranteeing consistent processing within rcu_head_after_call_rcu()(). Neverthless, racing rcu_head_after_call_rcu() with call_rcu() is still a dubious use case. Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> [ paulmck: Add blank line after declaration per checkpatch.pl. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/rcupdate.h6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 6cdb1db776cf..922bb6848813 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -878,9 +878,11 @@ static inline void rcu_head_init(struct rcu_head *rhp)
static inline bool
rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
{
- if (READ_ONCE(rhp->func) == f)
+ rcu_callback_t func = READ_ONCE(rhp->func);
+
+ if (func == f)
return true;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(rhp->func) != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(func != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
return false;
}