summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>2021-05-17 12:39:06 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2021-06-03 09:09:28 +0200
commitf65588e7ee56211677b67fc57b6096a91d9bb6ea (patch)
treefc981ed24e687e1f6ecef31f08b5648fb8b0fe96 /kernel
parent1b3c5876bb72a143190e435af8e7b0d53b72ee54 (diff)
seccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics
commit ddc473916955f7710d1eb17c1273d91c8622a9fe upstream. This refactors the user notification code to have a do / while loop around the completion condition. This has a small change in semantic, in that previously we ignored addfd calls upon wakeup if the notification had been responded to, but instead with the new change we check for an outstanding addfd calls prior to returning to userspace. Rodrigo Campos also identified a bug that can result in addfd causing an early return, when the supervisor didn't actually handle the syscall [1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210413160151.3301-1-rodrigo@kinvolk.io/ Fixes: 7cf97b125455 ("seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier") Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> Acked-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@kinvolk.io> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517193908.3113-3-sargun@sargun.me Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/seccomp.c30
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 1d60fc2c9987..93684cc63285 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1098,28 +1098,30 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
up(&match->notif->request);
wake_up_poll(&match->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
/*
* This is where we wait for a reply from userspace.
*/
-wait:
- err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
- mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
- if (err == 0) {
- /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ do {
+ mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
+ err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
+ mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
+ if (err != 0)
+ goto interrupted;
+
addfd = list_first_entry_or_null(&n.addfd,
struct seccomp_kaddfd, list);
- if (addfd && n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED) {
+ /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ if (addfd)
seccomp_handle_addfd(addfd);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
- goto wait;
- }
- ret = n.val;
- err = n.error;
- flags = n.flags;
- }
+ } while (n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED);
+
+ ret = n.val;
+ err = n.error;
+ flags = n.flags;
+
+interrupted:
/* If there were any pending addfd calls, clear them out */
list_for_each_entry_safe(addfd, tmp, &n.addfd, list) {
/* The process went away before we got a chance to handle it */