mac80211: fix key vs. sta locking problems

Up to now, key manipulation is supposed to run under RTNL to
avoid concurrent manipulations and also allow the set_key()
hardware callback to sleep. This is not feasible because STA
structs are rcu-protected and thus a lot of operations there
cannot take the RTNL. Also, key references are rcu-protected
so we cannot do things atomically.

This patch changes key locking completely:
 * key operations are now atomic
 * hardware crypto offload is enabled and disabled from
   a workqueue, due to that key freeing is also delayed
 * debugfs code is also run from a workqueue
 * keys reference STAs (and vice versa!) so during STA
   unlink the STAs key reference is removed but not the
   keys STA reference, to avoid races key todo work is
   run before STA destruction.
 * fewer STA operations now need the RTNL which was
   required due to key operations

This fixes the locking problems lockdep pointed out and also
makes things more light-weight because the rtnl isn't required
as much.

Note that the key todo lock/key mutex are global locks, this
is not required, of course, they could be per-hardware instead.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

1 files changed, 34 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
index 5f8db5cab65d..fe05a7b85dc6 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int ieee80211_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 	struct sta_info *sta = NULL;
 	enum ieee80211_key_alg alg;
 	struct ieee80211_key *key;
+	int err;
 
 	sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
 
@@ -157,17 +158,24 @@ static int ieee80211_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 	if (!key)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	if (mac_addr) {
 		sta = sta_info_get(sdata->local, mac_addr);
 		if (!sta) {
 			ieee80211_key_free(key);
-			return -ENOENT;
+			err = -ENOENT;
+			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 	}
 
 	ieee80211_key_link(key, sdata, sta);
 
-	return 0;
+	err = 0;
+ out_unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int ieee80211_del_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
@@ -179,28 +187,37 @@ static int ieee80211_del_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 
 	sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	if (mac_addr) {
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+
 		sta = sta_info_get(sdata->local, mac_addr);
 		if (!sta)
-			return -ENOENT;
+			goto out_unlock;
 
-		ret = 0;
 		if (sta->key) {
 			ieee80211_key_free(sta->key);
 			WARN_ON(sta->key);
-		} else
-			ret = -ENOENT;
+			ret = 0;
+		}
 
-		return ret;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (!sdata->keys[key_idx])
-		return -ENOENT;
+	if (!sdata->keys[key_idx]) {
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
 
 	ieee80211_key_free(sdata->keys[key_idx]);
 	WARN_ON(sdata->keys[key_idx]);
 
-	return 0;
+	ret = 0;
+ out_unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int ieee80211_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
@@ -217,6 +234,8 @@ static int ieee80211_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 	u16 iv16;
 	int err = -ENOENT;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	if (mac_addr) {
 		sta = sta_info_get(sdata->local, mac_addr);
 		if (!sta)
@@ -280,6 +299,7 @@ static int ieee80211_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
 	err = 0;
 
  out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -289,9 +309,13 @@ static int ieee80211_config_default_key(struct wiphy *wiphy,
 {
 	struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
 	ieee80211_set_default_key(sdata, key_idx);
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return 0;
 }