Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf 2021-07-09

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.

We've added 9 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain
a total of 13 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Fix runqslower task->state access from BPF, from SanjayKumar Jeyakumar.

2) Fix subprog poke descriptor tracking use-after-free, from John Fastabend.

3) Fix sparse complaint from prior devmap RCU conversion, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.

4) Fix missing va_end in bpftool JIT json dump's error path, from Gu Shengxian.

5) Fix tools/bpf install target from missing runqslower install, from Wei Li.

6) Fix xdpsock BPF sample to unload program on shared umem option, from Wang Hai.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

6 files changed, 53 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/tools/bpf/Makefile b/tools/bpf/Makefile
index 39bb322707b4..b11cfc86a3d0 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/Makefile
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ clean: bpftool_clean runqslower_clean resolve_btfids_clean
 	$(Q)$(RM) -- $(OUTPUT)FEATURE-DUMP.bpf
 	$(Q)$(RM) -r -- $(OUTPUT)feature
 
-install: $(PROGS) bpftool_install runqslower_install
+install: $(PROGS) bpftool_install
 	$(call QUIET_INSTALL, bpf_jit_disasm)
 	$(Q)$(INSTALL) -m 0755 -d $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin
 	$(Q)$(INSTALL) $(OUTPUT)bpf_jit_disasm $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/bin/bpf_jit_disasm
@@ -118,9 +118,6 @@ bpftool_clean:
 runqslower:
 	$(call descend,runqslower)
 
-runqslower_install:
-	$(call descend,runqslower,install)
-
 runqslower_clean:
 	$(call descend,runqslower,clean)
 
@@ -131,5 +128,5 @@ resolve_btfids_clean:
 	$(call descend,resolve_btfids,clean)
 
 .PHONY: all install clean bpftool bpftool_install bpftool_clean \
-	runqslower runqslower_install runqslower_clean \
+	runqslower runqslower_clean \
 	resolve_btfids resolve_btfids_clean
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
index e7e7eee9f172..24734f2249d6 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c
@@ -43,11 +43,13 @@ static int fprintf_json(void *out, const char *fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list ap;
 	char *s;
+	int err;
 
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	if (vasprintf(&s, fmt, ap) < 0)
-		return -1;
+	err = vasprintf(&s, fmt, ap);
 	va_end(ap);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return -1;
 
 	if (!oper_count) {
 		int i;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.bpf.c b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.bpf.c
index 645530ca7e98..ab9353f2fd46 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.bpf.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int handle__sched_switch(u64 *ctx)
 	u32 pid;
 
 	/* ivcsw: treat like an enqueue event and store timestamp */
-	if (prev->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+	if (prev->__state == TASK_RUNNING)
 		trace_enqueue(prev);
 
 	pid = next->pid;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 1e04ce724240..6f5e2757bb3c 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10136,7 +10136,7 @@ int bpf_link__unpin(struct bpf_link *link)
 
 	err = unlink(link->pin_path);
 	if (err != 0)
-		return libbpf_err_errno(err);
+		return -errno;
 
 	pr_debug("link fd=%d: unpinned from %s\n", link->fd, link->pin_path);
 	zfree(&link->pin_path);
@@ -11197,7 +11197,7 @@ int perf_buffer__poll(struct perf_buffer *pb, int timeout_ms)
 
 	cnt = epoll_wait(pb->epoll_fd, pb->events, pb->cpu_cnt, timeout_ms);
 	if (cnt < 0)
-		return libbpf_err_errno(cnt);
+		return -errno;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
 		struct perf_cpu_buf *cpu_buf = pb->events[i].data.ptr;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index ee27d68d2a1c..b5940e6ca67c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ out:
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
 }
 
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf4.skel.h"
+
 /* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 checks that tailcall counter is correctly preserved
  * across tailcalls combined with bpf2bpf calls. for making sure that tailcall
  * counter behaves correctly, bpf program will go through following flow:
@@ -727,10 +729,15 @@ out:
  * the loop begins. At the end of the test make sure that the global counter is
  * equal to 31, because tailcall counter includes the first two tailcalls
  * whereas global counter is incremented only on loop presented on flow above.
+ *
+ * The noise parameter is used to insert bpf_map_update calls into the logic
+ * to force verifier to patch instructions. This allows us to ensure jump
+ * logic remains correct with instruction movement.
  */
-static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise)
 {
-	int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val;
+	int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i;
+	struct tailcall_bpf2bpf4__bss val;
 	struct bpf_map *prog_array, *data_map;
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -774,11 +781,6 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
-				&duration, &retval, NULL);
-	CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
-	      err, errno, retval);
-
 	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss");
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map)))
 		return;
@@ -788,9 +790,21 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
 		return;
 
 	i = 0;
+	val.noise = noise;
+	val.count = 0;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(data_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY);
+	if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+				&duration, &retval, NULL);
+	CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+	      err, errno, retval);
+
+	i = 0;
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val);
-	CHECK(err || val != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
-	      err, errno, val);
+	CHECK(err || val.count != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
+	      err, errno, val.count);
 
 out:
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
@@ -815,5 +829,7 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_3"))
 		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_4"))
-		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4();
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
index 77df6d4db895..e89368a50b97 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
@@ -3,6 +3,13 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
 struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} nop_table SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
 	__uint(max_entries, 3);
 	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
@@ -10,10 +17,21 @@ struct {
 } jmp_table SEC(".maps");
 
 int count = 0;
+int noise = 0;
+
+__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)
+{
+	__u32 key = 0;
+
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
+	return 0;
+}
 
 __noinline
 int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (noise)
+		subprog_noise();
 	bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
 	return skb->len * 3;
 }