diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c index 31cd0f327c8a..e7fd60cf9780 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_tm.c @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + #include <linux/kvm_host.h> #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h> @@ -47,7 +49,18 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) u64 newmsr, bescr; int ra, rs; - switch (instr & 0xfc0007ff) { + /* + * rfid, rfebb, and mtmsrd encode bit 31 = 0 since it's a reserved bit + * in these instructions, so masking bit 31 out doesn't change these + * instructions. For treclaim., tsr., and trechkpt. instructions if bit + * 31 = 0 then they are per ISA invalid forms, however P9 UM, in section + * 4.6.10 Book II Invalid Forms, informs specifically that ignoring bit + * 31 is an acceptable way to handle these invalid forms that have + * bit 31 = 0. Moreover, for emulation purposes both forms (w/ and wo/ + * bit 31 set) can generate a softpatch interrupt. Hence both forms + * are handled below for these instructions so they behave the same way. + */ + switch (instr & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK) { case PPC_INST_RFID: /* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */ newmsr = vcpu->arch.shregs.srr1; @@ -108,7 +121,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = newmsr; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TSR: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TSR & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* check for PR=1 and arch 2.06 bit set in PCR */ if ((msr & MSR_PR) && (vcpu->arch.vcore->pcr & PCR_ARCH_206)) { /* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */ @@ -143,7 +157,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr = msr; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TRECLAIM: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TRECLAIM & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */ if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) { /* generate an illegal instruction interrupt */ @@ -179,7 +194,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.shregs.msr &= ~MSR_TS_MASK; return RESUME_GUEST; - case PPC_INST_TRECHKPT: + /* ignore bit 31, see comment above */ + case (PPC_INST_TRECHKPT & PO_XOP_OPCODE_MASK): /* XXX do we need to check for PR=0 here? */ /* check for TM disabled in the HFSCR or MSR */ if (!(vcpu->arch.hfscr & HFSCR_TM)) { @@ -211,6 +227,8 @@ int kvmhv_p9_tm_emulation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } /* What should we do here? We didn't recognize the instruction */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL); + pr_warn_ratelimited("Unrecognized TM-related instruction %#x for emulation", instr); + return RESUME_GUEST; } |