summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c729
1 files changed, 585 insertions, 144 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index c5c17a62f509..a08d66215245 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
/* Copyright (c) 2011-2014 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Facebook
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
@@ -136,13 +137,32 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
FRAME_PTR, /* reg == frame_pointer */
PTR_TO_STACK, /* reg == frame_pointer + imm */
CONST_IMM, /* constant integer value */
+
+ /* PTR_TO_PACKET represents:
+ * skb->data
+ * skb->data + imm
+ * skb->data + (u16) var
+ * skb->data + (u16) var + imm
+ * if (range > 0) then [ptr, ptr + range - off) is safe to access
+ * if (id > 0) means that some 'var' was added
+ * if (off > 0) menas that 'imm' was added
+ */
+ PTR_TO_PACKET,
+ PTR_TO_PACKET_END, /* skb->data + headlen */
};
struct reg_state {
enum bpf_reg_type type;
union {
- /* valid when type == CONST_IMM | PTR_TO_STACK */
- int imm;
+ /* valid when type == CONST_IMM | PTR_TO_STACK | UNKNOWN_VALUE */
+ s64 imm;
+
+ /* valid when type == PTR_TO_PACKET* */
+ struct {
+ u32 id;
+ u16 off;
+ u16 range;
+ };
/* valid when type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP | PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE |
* PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
@@ -202,6 +222,16 @@ struct verifier_env {
bool allow_ptr_leaks;
};
+#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 65536
+#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK 1024
+
+struct bpf_call_arg_meta {
+ struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
+ bool raw_mode;
+ int regno;
+ int access_size;
+};
+
/* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing
* bpf_check() is called under lock, so no race to access these global vars
*/
@@ -237,30 +267,39 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
[FRAME_PTR] = "fp",
[PTR_TO_STACK] = "fp",
[CONST_IMM] = "imm",
+ [PTR_TO_PACKET] = "pkt",
+ [PTR_TO_PACKET_END] = "pkt_end",
};
-static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env)
+static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_state *state)
{
+ struct reg_state *reg;
enum bpf_reg_type t;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
- t = env->cur_state.regs[i].type;
+ reg = &state->regs[i];
+ t = reg->type;
if (t == NOT_INIT)
continue;
verbose(" R%d=%s", i, reg_type_str[t]);
if (t == CONST_IMM || t == PTR_TO_STACK)
- verbose("%d", env->cur_state.regs[i].imm);
+ verbose("%lld", reg->imm);
+ else if (t == PTR_TO_PACKET)
+ verbose("(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)",
+ reg->id, reg->off, reg->range);
+ else if (t == UNKNOWN_VALUE && reg->imm)
+ verbose("%lld", reg->imm);
else if (t == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP || t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE ||
t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL)
verbose("(ks=%d,vs=%d)",
- env->cur_state.regs[i].map_ptr->key_size,
- env->cur_state.regs[i].map_ptr->value_size);
+ reg->map_ptr->key_size,
+ reg->map_ptr->value_size);
}
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
- if (env->cur_state.stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL)
+ if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL)
verbose(" fp%d=%s", -MAX_BPF_STACK + i,
- reg_type_str[env->cur_state.spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE].type]);
+ reg_type_str[state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE].type]);
}
verbose("\n");
}
@@ -444,7 +483,7 @@ static struct verifier_state *push_stack(struct verifier_env *env, int insn_idx,
elem->next = env->head;
env->head = elem;
env->stack_size++;
- if (env->stack_size > 1024) {
+ if (env->stack_size > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK) {
verbose("BPF program is too complex\n");
goto err;
}
@@ -467,7 +506,6 @@ static void init_reg_state(struct reg_state *regs)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
regs[i].type = NOT_INIT;
regs[i].imm = 0;
- regs[i].map_ptr = NULL;
}
/* frame pointer */
@@ -482,7 +520,6 @@ static void mark_reg_unknown_value(struct reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG);
regs[regno].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
regs[regno].imm = 0;
- regs[regno].map_ptr = NULL;
}
enum reg_arg_type {
@@ -538,6 +575,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL:
case PTR_TO_STACK:
case PTR_TO_CTX:
+ case PTR_TO_PACKET:
+ case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
case FRAME_PTR:
case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
return true;
@@ -637,13 +676,38 @@ static int check_map_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
return 0;
}
+#define MAX_PACKET_OFF 0xffff
+
+static int check_packet_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+ int size)
+{
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
+ int linear_size = (int) reg->range - (int) reg->off;
+
+ if (linear_size < 0 || linear_size >= MAX_PACKET_OFF) {
+ verbose("verifier bug\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ if (off < 0 || off + size > linear_size) {
+ verbose("invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, allowed=%d\n",
+ off, size, linear_size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields */
static int check_ctx_access(struct verifier_env *env, int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type t)
{
if (env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access &&
- env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t))
+ env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t)) {
+ /* remember the offset of last byte accessed in ctx */
+ if (env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset < off + size)
+ env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset = off + size;
return 0;
+ }
verbose("invalid bpf_context access off=%d size=%d\n", off, size);
return -EACCES;
@@ -663,6 +727,45 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct verifier_env *env, int regno)
}
}
+static int check_ptr_alignment(struct verifier_env *env, struct reg_state *reg,
+ int off, int size)
+{
+ if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ if (off % size != 0) {
+ verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n", off, size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ } else {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ switch (env->prog->type) {
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
+ break;
+ default:
+ verbose("verifier is misconfigured\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS))
+ /* misaligned access to packet is ok on x86,arm,arm64 */
+ return 0;
+
+ if (reg->id && size != 1) {
+ verbose("Unknown packet alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ /* skb->data is NET_IP_ALIGN-ed */
+ if ((NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off + off) % size != 0) {
+ verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n",
+ NET_IP_ALIGN, reg->off, off, size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* check whether memory at (regno + off) is accessible for t = (read | write)
* if t==write, value_regno is a register which value is stored into memory
* if t==read, value_regno is a register which will receive the value from memory
@@ -674,21 +777,21 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
int value_regno)
{
struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
+ struct reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno];
int size, err = 0;
- if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_STACK)
- off += state->regs[regno].imm;
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK)
+ off += reg->imm;
size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size);
if (size < 0)
return size;
- if (off % size != 0) {
- verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n", off, size);
- return -EACCES;
- }
+ err = check_ptr_alignment(env, reg, off, size);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
verbose("R%d leaks addr into map\n", value_regno);
@@ -698,18 +801,25 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
- } else if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_CTX) {
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) {
if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno);
return -EACCES;
}
err = check_ctx_access(env, off, size, t);
- if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
+ if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
+ if (off == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) &&
+ env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ /* note that reg.[id|off|range] == 0 */
+ state->regs[value_regno].type = PTR_TO_PACKET;
+ else if (off == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end) &&
+ env->allow_ptr_leaks)
+ state->regs[value_regno].type = PTR_TO_PACKET_END;
+ }
- } else if (state->regs[regno].type == FRAME_PTR ||
- state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ } else if (reg->type == FRAME_PTR || reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) {
verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size);
return -EACCES;
@@ -725,11 +835,28 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
} else {
err = check_stack_read(state, off, size, value_regno);
}
+ } else if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ if (t == BPF_WRITE) {
+ verbose("cannot write into packet\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size);
+ if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
} else {
verbose("R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n",
- regno, reg_type_str[state->regs[regno].type]);
+ regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]);
return -EACCES;
}
+
+ if (!err && size <= 2 && value_regno >= 0 && env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
+ state->regs[value_regno].type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
+ /* 1 or 2 byte load zero-extends, determine the number of
+ * zero upper bits. Not doing it fo 4 byte load, since
+ * such values cannot be added to ptr_to_packet anyway.
+ */
+ state->regs[value_regno].imm = 64 - size * 8;
+ }
return err;
}
@@ -770,7 +897,8 @@ static int check_xadd(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
* and all elements of stack are initialized
*/
static int check_stack_boundary(struct verifier_env *env, int regno,
- int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed)
+ int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed,
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
struct reg_state *regs = state->regs;
@@ -796,6 +924,12 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct verifier_env *env, int regno,
return -EACCES;
}
+ if (meta && meta->raw_mode) {
+ meta->access_size = access_size;
+ meta->regno = regno;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < access_size; i++) {
if (state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] != STACK_MISC) {
verbose("invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n",
@@ -807,7 +941,8 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct verifier_env *env, int regno,
}
static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
- enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_map **mapp)
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
struct reg_state *reg = env->cur_state.regs + regno;
enum bpf_reg_type expected_type;
@@ -839,7 +974,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
expected_type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_CTX) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_CTX;
- } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_STACK ||
+ arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
/* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
* passed in as argument, it's a CONST_IMM type. Final test
@@ -847,6 +983,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
*/
if (reg->type == CONST_IMM && reg->imm == 0)
expected_type = CONST_IMM;
+ meta->raw_mode = arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK;
} else {
verbose("unsupported arg_type %d\n", arg_type);
return -EFAULT;
@@ -860,14 +997,13 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
/* bpf_map_xxx(map_ptr) call: remember that map_ptr */
- *mapp = reg->map_ptr;
-
+ meta->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY) {
/* bpf_map_xxx(..., map_ptr, ..., key) call:
* check that [key, key + map->key_size) are within
* stack limits and initialized
*/
- if (!*mapp) {
+ if (!meta->map_ptr) {
/* in function declaration map_ptr must come before
* map_key, so that it's verified and known before
* we have to check map_key here. Otherwise it means
@@ -876,19 +1012,20 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->key\n");
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->key_size,
- false);
+ err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, meta->map_ptr->key_size,
+ false, NULL);
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
/* bpf_map_xxx(..., map_ptr, ..., value) call:
* check [value, value + map->value_size) validity
*/
- if (!*mapp) {
+ if (!meta->map_ptr) {
/* kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier */
verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->value\n");
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->value_size,
- false);
+ err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno,
+ meta->map_ptr->value_size,
+ false, NULL);
} else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE ||
arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO) {
bool zero_size_allowed = (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO);
@@ -903,7 +1040,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
}
err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno - 1, reg->imm,
- zero_size_allowed);
+ zero_size_allowed, meta);
}
return err;
@@ -959,13 +1096,55 @@ error:
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
+ if (fn->arg1_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK)
+ count++;
+ if (fn->arg2_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK)
+ count++;
+ if (fn->arg3_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK)
+ count++;
+ if (fn->arg4_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK)
+ count++;
+ if (fn->arg5_type == ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK)
+ count++;
+
+ return count > 1 ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+
+static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct verifier_env *env)
+{
+ struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
+ struct reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
+ if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET ||
+ regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END)
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, i);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
+ if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
+ continue;
+ reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE];
+ if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET &&
+ reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET_END)
+ continue;
+ reg->type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
+ reg->imm = 0;
+ }
+}
+
static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
{
struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL;
struct reg_state *regs = state->regs;
- struct bpf_map *map = NULL;
struct reg_state *reg;
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta;
+ bool changes_data;
int i, err;
/* find function prototype */
@@ -988,23 +1167,45 @@ static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ changes_data = bpf_helper_changes_skb_data(fn->func);
+
+ memset(&meta, 0, sizeof(meta));
+
+ /* We only support one arg being in raw mode at the moment, which
+ * is sufficient for the helper functions we have right now.
+ */
+ err = check_raw_mode(fn);
+ if (err) {
+ verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %d\n", func_id);
+ return err;
+ }
+
/* check args */
- err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_1, fn->arg1_type, &map);
+ err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_1, fn->arg1_type, &meta);
if (err)
return err;
- err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_2, fn->arg2_type, &map);
+ err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_2, fn->arg2_type, &meta);
if (err)
return err;
- err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_3, fn->arg3_type, &map);
+ err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_3, fn->arg3_type, &meta);
if (err)
return err;
- err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_4, fn->arg4_type, &map);
+ err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_4, fn->arg4_type, &meta);
if (err)
return err;
- err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_5, fn->arg5_type, &map);
+ err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_5, fn->arg5_type, &meta);
if (err)
return err;
+ /* Mark slots with STACK_MISC in case of raw mode, stack offset
+ * is inferred from register state.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < meta.access_size; i++) {
+ err = check_mem_access(env, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
/* reset caller saved regs */
for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) {
reg = regs + caller_saved[i];
@@ -1023,28 +1224,211 @@ static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
* can check 'value_size' boundary of memory access
* to map element returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem()
*/
- if (map == NULL) {
+ if (meta.map_ptr == NULL) {
verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = map;
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
} else {
verbose("unknown return type %d of func %d\n",
fn->ret_type, func_id);
return -EINVAL;
}
- err = check_map_func_compatibility(map, func_id);
+ err = check_map_func_compatibility(meta.map_ptr, func_id);
if (err)
return err;
+ if (changes_data)
+ clear_all_pkt_pointers(env);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_packet_ptr_add(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+ struct reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
+ s32 imm;
+
+ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
+ /* pkt_ptr += imm */
+ imm = insn->imm;
+
+add_imm:
+ if (imm <= 0) {
+ verbose("addition of negative constant to packet pointer is not allowed\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (imm >= MAX_PACKET_OFF ||
+ imm + dst_reg->off >= MAX_PACKET_OFF) {
+ verbose("constant %d is too large to add to packet pointer\n",
+ imm);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ /* a constant was added to pkt_ptr.
+ * Remember it while keeping the same 'id'
+ */
+ dst_reg->off += imm;
+ } else {
+ if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
+ /* pkt_ptr += reg where reg is known constant */
+ imm = src_reg->imm;
+ goto add_imm;
+ }
+ /* disallow pkt_ptr += reg
+ * if reg is not uknown_value with guaranteed zero upper bits
+ * otherwise pkt_ptr may overflow and addition will become
+ * subtraction which is not allowed
+ */
+ if (src_reg->type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) {
+ verbose("cannot add '%s' to ptr_to_packet\n",
+ reg_type_str[src_reg->type]);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ if (src_reg->imm < 48) {
+ verbose("cannot add integer value with %lld upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet\n",
+ src_reg->imm);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ /* dst_reg stays as pkt_ptr type and since some positive
+ * integer value was added to the pointer, increment its 'id'
+ */
+ dst_reg->id++;
+
+ /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range and off to zero */
+ dst_reg->off = 0;
+ dst_reg->range = 0;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int evaluate_reg_alu(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+ u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
+ s64 imm_log2;
+
+ /* for type == UNKNOWN_VALUE:
+ * imm > 0 -> number of zero upper bits
+ * imm == 0 -> don't track which is the same as all bits can be non-zero
+ */
+
+ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
+ struct reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
+
+ if (src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && src_reg->imm > 0 &&
+ dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
+ /* dreg += sreg
+ * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them
+ * can only result making one more bit non-zero
+ * in the larger value.
+ * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47)
+ * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47)
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, src_reg->imm);
+ dst_reg->imm--;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM && src_reg->imm > 0 &&
+ dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
+ /* dreg += sreg
+ * where dreg has zero upper bits and sreg is const.
+ * Adding them can only result making one more bit
+ * non-zero in the larger value.
+ */
+ imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)src_reg->imm);
+ dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
+ dst_reg->imm--;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* all other cases non supported yet, just mark dst_reg */
+ dst_reg->imm = 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* sign extend 32-bit imm into 64-bit to make sure that
+ * negative values occupy bit 63. Note ilog2() would have
+ * been incorrect, since sizeof(insn->imm) == 4
+ */
+ imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)insn->imm);
+
+ if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_LSH) {
+ /* reg <<= imm
+ * if reg was a result of 2 byte load, then its imm == 48
+ * which means that upper 48 bits are zero and shifting this reg
+ * left by 4 would mean that upper 44 bits are still zero
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm -= insn->imm;
+ } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_MUL) {
+ /* reg *= imm
+ * if multiplying by 14 subtract 4
+ * This is conservative calculation of upper zero bits.
+ * It's not trying to special case insn->imm == 1 or 0 cases
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm -= imm_log2 + 1;
+ } else if (opcode == BPF_AND) {
+ /* reg &= imm */
+ dst_reg->imm = 63 - imm_log2;
+ } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) {
+ /* reg += imm */
+ dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2);
+ dst_reg->imm--;
+ } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH) {
+ /* reg >>= imm
+ * which means that after right shift, upper bits will be zero
+ * note that verifier already checked that
+ * 0 <= imm < 64 for shift insn
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm += insn->imm;
+ if (unlikely(dst_reg->imm > 64))
+ /* some dumb code did:
+ * r2 = *(u32 *)mem;
+ * r2 >>= 32;
+ * and all bits are zero now */
+ dst_reg->imm = 64;
+ } else {
+ /* all other alu ops, means that we don't know what will
+ * happen to the value, mark it with unknown number of zero bits
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (dst_reg->imm < 0) {
+ /* all 64 bits of the register can contain non-zero bits
+ * and such value cannot be added to ptr_to_packet, since it
+ * may overflow, mark it as unknown to avoid further eval
+ */
+ dst_reg->imm = 0;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+ struct reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
+ u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
+
+ /* dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM here, simulate execution of 'add' insn.
+ * Don't care about overflow or negative values, just add them
+ */
+ if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K)
+ dst_reg->imm += insn->imm;
+ else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
+ src_reg->type == CONST_IMM)
+ dst_reg->imm += src_reg->imm;
+ else
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
return 0;
}
/* check validity of 32-bit and 64-bit arithmetic operations */
static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
- struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
int err;
@@ -1133,8 +1517,6 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
} else { /* all other ALU ops: and, sub, xor, add, ... */
- bool stack_relative = false;
-
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off != 0) {
verbose("BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n");
@@ -1172,11 +1554,34 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
}
+ /* check dest operand */
+ err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+
/* pattern match 'bpf_add Rx, imm' instruction */
if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type == FRAME_PTR &&
- BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
- stack_relative = true;
+ dst_reg->type == FRAME_PTR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
+ dst_reg->type = PTR_TO_STACK;
+ dst_reg->imm = insn->imm;
+ return 0;
+ } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD &&
+ BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
+ dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ /* ptr_to_packet += K|X */
+ return check_packet_ptr_add(env, insn);
+ } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
+ dst_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE &&
+ env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ /* unknown += K|X */
+ return evaluate_reg_alu(env, insn);
+ } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
+ dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM &&
+ env->allow_ptr_leaks) {
+ /* reg_imm += K|X */
+ return evaluate_reg_imm_alu(env, insn);
} else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n",
insn->dst_reg);
@@ -1188,24 +1593,45 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EACCES;
}
- /* check dest operand */
- err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- if (stack_relative) {
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type = PTR_TO_STACK;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
- }
+ /* mark dest operand */
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
}
return 0;
}
+static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct verifier_env *env,
+ struct reg_state *dst_reg)
+{
+ struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
+ struct reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg;
+ int i;
+ /* r2 = r3;
+ * r2 += 8
+ * if (r2 > pkt_end) goto somewhere
+ * r2 == dst_reg, pkt_end == src_reg,
+ * r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0)
+ * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0)
+ * find register r3 and mark its range as r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8)
+ * so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) is safe to access
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
+ if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id)
+ regs[i].range = dst_reg->off;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) {
+ if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
+ continue;
+ reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE];
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id)
+ reg->range = dst_reg->off;
+ }
+}
+
static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_insn *insn, int *insn_idx)
{
- struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
+ struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
struct verifier_state *other_branch;
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
int err;
@@ -1243,11 +1669,12 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct verifier_env *env,
if (err)
return err;
+ dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
+
/* detect if R == 0 where R was initialized to zero earlier */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
(opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type == CONST_IMM &&
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm == insn->imm) {
+ dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM && dst_reg->imm == insn->imm) {
if (opcode == BPF_JEQ) {
/* if (imm == imm) goto pc+off;
* only follow the goto, ignore fall-through
@@ -1269,44 +1696,30 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct verifier_env *env,
/* detect if R == 0 where R is returned value from bpf_map_lookup_elem() */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
- insn->imm == 0 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ ||
- opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
+ insn->imm == 0 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
+ dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
if (opcode == BPF_JEQ) {
/* next fallthrough insn can access memory via
* this register
*/
regs[insn->dst_reg].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
/* branch targer cannot access it, since reg == 0 */
- other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = 0;
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(other_branch->regs,
+ insn->dst_reg);
} else {
other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = 0;
+ mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg);
}
+ } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT &&
+ dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) {
+ find_good_pkt_pointers(env, dst_reg);
} else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg);
return -EACCES;
- } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
- (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE)) {
-
- if (opcode == BPF_JEQ) {
- /* detect if (R == imm) goto
- * and in the target state recognize that R = imm
- */
- other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
- } else {
- /* detect if (R != imm) goto
- * and in the fall-through state recognize that R = imm
- */
- regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM;
- regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm;
- }
}
if (log_level)
- print_verifier_state(env);
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
return 0;
}
@@ -1384,14 +1797,14 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
int i, err;
if (!may_access_skb(env->prog->type)) {
- verbose("BPF_LD_ABS|IND instructions not allowed for this program type\n");
+ verbose("BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] instructions not allowed for this program type\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ||
(mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) {
- verbose("BPF_LD_ABS uses reserved fields\n");
+ verbose("BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1555,6 +1968,8 @@ peek_stack:
goto peek_stack;
else if (ret < 0)
goto err_free;
+ if (t + 1 < insn_cnt)
+ env->explored_states[t + 1] = STATE_LIST_MARK;
} else if (opcode == BPF_JA) {
if (BPF_SRC(insns[t].code) != BPF_K) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -1622,6 +2037,58 @@ err_free:
return ret;
}
+/* the following conditions reduce the number of explored insns
+ * from ~140k to ~80k for ultra large programs that use a lot of ptr_to_packet
+ */
+static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct reg_state *old, struct reg_state *cur)
+{
+ if (old->id != cur->id)
+ return false;
+
+ /* old ptr_to_packet is more conservative, since it allows smaller
+ * range. Ex:
+ * old(off=0,r=10) is equal to cur(off=0,r=20), because
+ * old(off=0,r=10) means that with range=10 the verifier proceeded
+ * further and found no issues with the program. Now we're in the same
+ * spot with cur(off=0,r=20), so we're safe too, since anything further
+ * will only be looking at most 10 bytes after this pointer.
+ */
+ if (old->off == cur->off && old->range < cur->range)
+ return true;
+
+ /* old(off=20,r=10) is equal to cur(off=22,re=22 or 5 or 0)
+ * since both cannot be used for packet access and safe(old)
+ * pointer has smaller off that could be used for further
+ * 'if (ptr > data_end)' check
+ * Ex:
+ * old(off=20,r=10) and cur(off=22,r=22) and cur(off=22,r=0) mean
+ * that we cannot access the packet.
+ * The safe range is:
+ * [ptr, ptr + range - off)
+ * so whenever off >=range, it means no safe bytes from this pointer.
+ * When comparing old->off <= cur->off, it means that older code
+ * went with smaller offset and that offset was later
+ * used to figure out the safe range after 'if (ptr > data_end)' check
+ * Say, 'old' state was explored like:
+ * ... R3(off=0, r=0)
+ * R4 = R3 + 20
+ * ... now R4(off=20,r=0) <-- here
+ * if (R4 > data_end)
+ * ... R4(off=20,r=20), R3(off=0,r=20) and R3 can be used to access.
+ * ... the code further went all the way to bpf_exit.
+ * Now the 'cur' state at the mark 'here' has R4(off=30,r=0).
+ * old_R4(off=20,r=0) equal to cur_R4(off=30,r=0), since if the verifier
+ * goes further, such cur_R4 will give larger safe packet range after
+ * 'if (R4 > data_end)' and all further insn were already good with r=20,
+ * so they will be good with r=30 and we can prune the search.
+ */
+ if (old->off <= cur->off &&
+ old->off >= old->range && cur->off >= cur->range)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/* compare two verifier states
*
* all states stored in state_list are known to be valid, since
@@ -1650,17 +2117,25 @@ err_free:
*/
static bool states_equal(struct verifier_state *old, struct verifier_state *cur)
{
+ struct reg_state *rold, *rcur;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) {
- if (memcmp(&old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i],
- sizeof(old->regs[0])) != 0) {
- if (old->regs[i].type == NOT_INIT ||
- (old->regs[i].type == UNKNOWN_VALUE &&
- cur->regs[i].type != NOT_INIT))
- continue;
- return false;
- }
+ rold = &old->regs[i];
+ rcur = &cur->regs[i];
+
+ if (memcmp(rold, rcur, sizeof(*rold)) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ if (rold->type == NOT_INIT ||
+ (rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && rcur->type != NOT_INIT))
+ continue;
+
+ if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET &&
+ compare_ptrs_to_packet(rold, rcur))
+ continue;
+
+ return false;
}
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i++) {
@@ -1759,7 +2234,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
insn = &insns[insn_idx];
class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
- if (++insn_processed > 32768) {
+ if (++insn_processed > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS) {
verbose("BPF program is too large. Proccessed %d insn\n",
insn_processed);
return -E2BIG;
@@ -1782,7 +2257,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
if (log_level && do_print_state) {
verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx);
- print_verifier_state(env);
+ print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state);
do_print_state = false;
}
@@ -1994,6 +2469,7 @@ process_bpf_exit:
insn_idx++;
}
+ verbose("processed %d insns\n", insn_processed);
return 0;
}
@@ -2111,26 +2587,6 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct verifier_env *env)
insn->src_reg = 0;
}
-static void adjust_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, int pos, int delta)
-{
- struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
- int insn_cnt = prog->len;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
- if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_JMP ||
- BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_CALL ||
- BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_EXIT)
- continue;
-
- /* adjust offset of jmps if necessary */
- if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos)
- insn->off += delta;
- else if (i > pos + delta && i + insn->off + 1 <= pos + delta)
- insn->off -= delta;
- }
-}
-
/* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
* into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
*/
@@ -2140,14 +2596,15 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16];
struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
- u32 cnt;
- int i;
enum bpf_access_type type;
+ int i;
if (!env->prog->aux->ops->convert_ctx_access)
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+ u32 insn_delta, cnt;
+
if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
type = BPF_READ;
else if (insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
@@ -2169,34 +2626,18 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (cnt == 1) {
- memcpy(insn, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn));
- continue;
- }
-
- /* several new insns need to be inserted. Make room for them */
- insn_cnt += cnt - 1;
- new_prog = bpf_prog_realloc(env->prog,
- bpf_prog_size(insn_cnt),
- GFP_USER);
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
- new_prog->len = insn_cnt;
-
- memmove(new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt, new_prog->insns + i + 1,
- sizeof(*insn) * (insn_cnt - i - cnt));
-
- /* copy substitute insns in place of load instruction */
- memcpy(new_prog->insnsi + i, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn) * cnt);
-
- /* adjust branches in the whole program */
- adjust_branches(new_prog, i, cnt - 1);
+ insn_delta = cnt - 1;
/* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */
env->prog = new_prog;
- insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt - 1;
- i += cnt - 1;
+ insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + insn_delta;
+
+ insn_cnt += insn_delta;
+ i += insn_delta;
}
return 0;