diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3654 |
1 files changed, 2185 insertions, 1469 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index af9e84a4944e..d4593571c404 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/stringify.h> +#include "disasm.h" + +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops * const bpf_verifier_ops[] = { +#define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _name) \ + [_id] = & _name ## _verifier_ops, +#define BPF_MAP_TYPE(_id, _ops) +#include <linux/bpf_types.h> +#undef BPF_PROG_TYPE +#undef BPF_MAP_TYPE +}; + /* bpf_check() is a static code analyzer that walks eBPF program * instruction by instruction and updates register/stack state. * All paths of conditional branches are analyzed until 'bpf_exit' insn. @@ -61,12 +72,12 @@ * (and -20 constant is saved for further stack bounds checking). * Meaning that this reg is a pointer to stack plus known immediate constant. * - * Most of the time the registers have UNKNOWN_VALUE type, which + * Most of the time the registers have SCALAR_VALUE type, which * means the register has some value, but it's not a valid pointer. - * (like pointer plus pointer becomes UNKNOWN_VALUE type) + * (like pointer plus pointer becomes SCALAR_VALUE type) * * When verifier sees load or store instructions the type of base register - * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, FRAME_PTR. These are three pointer + * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK. These are three pointer * types recognized by check_mem_access() function. * * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE means that this register is pointing to 'map element value' @@ -140,7 +151,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem { struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *next; }; -#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 98304 +#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 131072 #define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK 1024 #define BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ((void *)0xeB9F + POISON_POINTER_DELTA) @@ -153,63 +164,60 @@ struct bpf_call_arg_meta { int access_size; }; -/* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing - * bpf_check() is called under lock, so no race to access these global vars - */ -static u32 log_level, log_size, log_len; -static char *log_buf; - static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_verifier_lock); /* log_level controls verbosity level of eBPF verifier. * verbose() is used to dump the verification trace to the log, so the user * can figure out what's wrong with the program */ -static __printf(1, 2) void verbose(const char *fmt, ...) +static __printf(2, 3) void verbose(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const char *fmt, ...) { + struct bpf_verifer_log *log = &env->log; + unsigned int n; va_list args; - if (log_level == 0 || log_len >= log_size - 1) + if (!log->level || !log->ubuf || bpf_verifier_log_full(log)) return; va_start(args, fmt); - log_len += vscnprintf(log_buf + log_len, log_size - log_len, fmt, args); + n = vscnprintf(log->kbuf, BPF_VERIFIER_TMP_LOG_SIZE, fmt, args); va_end(args); + + WARN_ONCE(n >= BPF_VERIFIER_TMP_LOG_SIZE - 1, + "verifier log line truncated - local buffer too short\n"); + + n = min(log->len_total - log->len_used - 1, n); + log->kbuf[n] = '\0'; + + if (!copy_to_user(log->ubuf + log->len_used, log->kbuf, n + 1)) + log->len_used += n; + else + log->ubuf = NULL; +} + +static bool type_is_pkt_pointer(enum bpf_reg_type type) +{ + return type == PTR_TO_PACKET || + type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META; } /* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */ static const char * const reg_type_str[] = { [NOT_INIT] = "?", - [UNKNOWN_VALUE] = "inv", + [SCALAR_VALUE] = "inv", [PTR_TO_CTX] = "ctx", [CONST_PTR_TO_MAP] = "map_ptr", [PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE] = "map_value", [PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL] = "map_value_or_null", - [PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ] = "map_value_adj", - [FRAME_PTR] = "fp", [PTR_TO_STACK] = "fp", - [CONST_IMM] = "imm", [PTR_TO_PACKET] = "pkt", + [PTR_TO_PACKET_META] = "pkt_meta", [PTR_TO_PACKET_END] = "pkt_end", }; -#define __BPF_FUNC_STR_FN(x) [BPF_FUNC_ ## x] = __stringify(bpf_ ## x) -static const char * const func_id_str[] = { - __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(__BPF_FUNC_STR_FN) -}; -#undef __BPF_FUNC_STR_FN - -static const char *func_id_name(int id) -{ - BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(func_id_str) != __BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID); - - if (id >= 0 && id < __BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID && func_id_str[id]) - return func_id_str[id]; - else - return "unknown"; -} - -static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) +static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_verifier_state *state) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg; enum bpf_reg_type t; @@ -220,241 +228,196 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) t = reg->type; if (t == NOT_INIT) continue; - verbose(" R%d=%s", i, reg_type_str[t]); - if (t == CONST_IMM || t == PTR_TO_STACK) - verbose("%lld", reg->imm); - else if (t == PTR_TO_PACKET) - verbose("(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)", - reg->id, reg->off, reg->range); - else if (t == UNKNOWN_VALUE && reg->imm) - verbose("%lld", reg->imm); - else if (t == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP || t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE || - t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL || - t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ) - verbose("(ks=%d,vs=%d,id=%u)", - reg->map_ptr->key_size, - reg->map_ptr->value_size, - reg->id); - if (reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - verbose(",min_value=%lld", - (long long)reg->min_value); - if (reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - verbose(",max_value=%llu", - (unsigned long long)reg->max_value); - if (reg->min_align) - verbose(",min_align=%u", reg->min_align); - if (reg->aux_off) - verbose(",aux_off=%u", reg->aux_off); - if (reg->aux_off_align) - verbose(",aux_off_align=%u", reg->aux_off_align); - } - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL) - verbose(" fp%d=%s", -MAX_BPF_STACK + i, - reg_type_str[state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE].type]); - } - verbose("\n"); -} - -static const char *const bpf_class_string[] = { - [BPF_LD] = "ld", - [BPF_LDX] = "ldx", - [BPF_ST] = "st", - [BPF_STX] = "stx", - [BPF_ALU] = "alu", - [BPF_JMP] = "jmp", - [BPF_RET] = "BUG", - [BPF_ALU64] = "alu64", -}; - -static const char *const bpf_alu_string[16] = { - [BPF_ADD >> 4] = "+=", - [BPF_SUB >> 4] = "-=", - [BPF_MUL >> 4] = "*=", - [BPF_DIV >> 4] = "/=", - [BPF_OR >> 4] = "|=", - [BPF_AND >> 4] = "&=", - [BPF_LSH >> 4] = "<<=", - [BPF_RSH >> 4] = ">>=", - [BPF_NEG >> 4] = "neg", - [BPF_MOD >> 4] = "%=", - [BPF_XOR >> 4] = "^=", - [BPF_MOV >> 4] = "=", - [BPF_ARSH >> 4] = "s>>=", - [BPF_END >> 4] = "endian", -}; - -static const char *const bpf_ldst_string[] = { - [BPF_W >> 3] = "u32", - [BPF_H >> 3] = "u16", - [BPF_B >> 3] = "u8", - [BPF_DW >> 3] = "u64", -}; + verbose(env, " R%d=%s", i, reg_type_str[t]); + if ((t == SCALAR_VALUE || t == PTR_TO_STACK) && + tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + /* reg->off should be 0 for SCALAR_VALUE */ + verbose(env, "%lld", reg->var_off.value + reg->off); + } else { + verbose(env, "(id=%d", reg->id); + if (t != SCALAR_VALUE) + verbose(env, ",off=%d", reg->off); + if (type_is_pkt_pointer(t)) + verbose(env, ",r=%d", reg->range); + else if (t == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP || + t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE || + t == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) + verbose(env, ",ks=%d,vs=%d", + reg->map_ptr->key_size, + reg->map_ptr->value_size); + if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + /* Typically an immediate SCALAR_VALUE, but + * could be a pointer whose offset is too big + * for reg->off + */ + verbose(env, ",imm=%llx", reg->var_off.value); + } else { + if (reg->smin_value != reg->umin_value && + reg->smin_value != S64_MIN) + verbose(env, ",smin_value=%lld", + (long long)reg->smin_value); + if (reg->smax_value != reg->umax_value && + reg->smax_value != S64_MAX) + verbose(env, ",smax_value=%lld", + (long long)reg->smax_value); + if (reg->umin_value != 0) + verbose(env, ",umin_value=%llu", + (unsigned long long)reg->umin_value); + if (reg->umax_value != U64_MAX) + verbose(env, ",umax_value=%llu", + (unsigned long long)reg->umax_value); + if (!tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, ",var_off=%s", tn_buf); + } + } + verbose(env, ")"); + } + } + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + verbose(env, " fp%d=%s", + -MAX_BPF_STACK + i * BPF_REG_SIZE, + reg_type_str[state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.type]); + } + verbose(env, "\n"); +} -static const char *const bpf_jmp_string[16] = { - [BPF_JA >> 4] = "jmp", - [BPF_JEQ >> 4] = "==", - [BPF_JGT >> 4] = ">", - [BPF_JGE >> 4] = ">=", - [BPF_JSET >> 4] = "&", - [BPF_JNE >> 4] = "!=", - [BPF_JSGT >> 4] = "s>", - [BPF_JSGE >> 4] = "s>=", - [BPF_CALL >> 4] = "call", - [BPF_EXIT >> 4] = "exit", -}; +static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +{ + if (!src->stack) + return 0; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dst->allocated_stack < src->allocated_stack)) { + /* internal bug, make state invalid to reject the program */ + memset(dst, 0, sizeof(*dst)); + return -EFAULT; + } + memcpy(dst->stack, src->stack, + sizeof(*src->stack) * (src->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + return 0; +} -static void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - const struct bpf_insn *insn) +/* do_check() starts with zero-sized stack in struct bpf_verifier_state to + * make it consume minimal amount of memory. check_stack_write() access from + * the program calls into realloc_verifier_state() to grow the stack size. + * Note there is a non-zero 'parent' pointer inside bpf_verifier_state + * which this function copies over. It points to previous bpf_verifier_state + * which is never reallocated + */ +static int realloc_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int size, + bool copy_old) { - u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); + u32 old_size = state->allocated_stack; + struct bpf_stack_state *new_stack; + int slot = size / BPF_REG_SIZE; - if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) - verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %sr%d\n", - insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", - insn->dst_reg, - bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], - class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", - insn->src_reg); - else - verbose("(%02x) %sr%d %s %s%d\n", - insn->code, class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", - insn->dst_reg, - bpf_alu_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], - class == BPF_ALU ? "(u32) " : "", - insn->imm); - } else if (class == BPF_STX) { - if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEM) - verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = r%d\n", - insn->code, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->dst_reg, - insn->off, insn->src_reg); - else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) - verbose("(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) += r%d\n", - insn->code, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->dst_reg, insn->off, - insn->src_reg); - else - verbose("BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); - } else if (class == BPF_ST) { - if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { - verbose("BUG_st_%02x\n", insn->code); - return; - } - verbose("(%02x) *(%s *)(r%d %+d) = %d\n", - insn->code, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->dst_reg, - insn->off, insn->imm); - } else if (class == BPF_LDX) { - if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM) { - verbose("BUG_ldx_%02x\n", insn->code); - return; - } - verbose("(%02x) r%d = *(%s *)(r%d %+d)\n", - insn->code, insn->dst_reg, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->src_reg, insn->off); - } else if (class == BPF_LD) { - if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ABS) { - verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[%d]\n", - insn->code, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->imm); - } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IND) { - verbose("(%02x) r0 = *(%s *)skb[r%d + %d]\n", - insn->code, - bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], - insn->src_reg, insn->imm); - } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_IMM && - BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) { - /* At this point, we already made sure that the second - * part of the ldimm64 insn is accessible. - */ - u64 imm = ((u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32) | (u32)insn->imm; - bool map_ptr = insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD; + if (size <= old_size || !size) { + if (copy_old) + return 0; + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (!size && old_size) { + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = NULL; + } + return 0; + } + new_stack = kmalloc_array(slot, sizeof(struct bpf_stack_state), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!new_stack) + return -ENOMEM; + if (copy_old) { + if (state->stack) + memcpy(new_stack, state->stack, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + memset(new_stack + old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE, 0, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (size - old_size) / BPF_REG_SIZE); + } + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = new_stack; + return 0; +} - if (map_ptr && !env->allow_ptr_leaks) - imm = 0; +static void free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + bool free_self) +{ + kfree(state->stack); + if (free_self) + kfree(state); +} - verbose("(%02x) r%d = 0x%llx\n", insn->code, - insn->dst_reg, (unsigned long long)imm); - } else { - verbose("BUG_ld_%02x\n", insn->code); - return; - } - } else if (class == BPF_JMP) { - u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); +/* copy verifier state from src to dst growing dst stack space + * when necessary to accommodate larger src stack + */ +static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +{ + int err; - if (opcode == BPF_CALL) { - verbose("(%02x) call %s#%d\n", insn->code, - func_id_name(insn->imm), insn->imm); - } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA)) { - verbose("(%02x) goto pc%+d\n", - insn->code, insn->off); - } else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT)) { - verbose("(%02x) exit\n", insn->code); - } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s r%d goto pc%+d\n", - insn->code, insn->dst_reg, - bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], - insn->src_reg, insn->off); - } else { - verbose("(%02x) if r%d %s 0x%x goto pc%+d\n", - insn->code, insn->dst_reg, - bpf_jmp_string[BPF_OP(insn->code) >> 4], - insn->imm, insn->off); - } - } else { - verbose("(%02x) %s\n", insn->code, bpf_class_string[class]); - } + err = realloc_verifier_state(dst, src->allocated_stack, false); + if (err) + return err; + memcpy(dst, src, offsetof(struct bpf_verifier_state, allocated_stack)); + return copy_stack_state(dst, src); } -static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx) +static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx, + int *insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; - int insn_idx; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem, *head = env->head; + int err; if (env->head == NULL) - return -1; + return -ENOENT; - memcpy(&env->cur_state, &env->head->st, sizeof(env->cur_state)); - insn_idx = env->head->insn_idx; + if (cur) { + err = copy_verifier_state(cur, &head->st); + if (err) + return err; + } + if (insn_idx) + *insn_idx = head->insn_idx; if (prev_insn_idx) - *prev_insn_idx = env->head->prev_insn_idx; - elem = env->head->next; - kfree(env->head); + *prev_insn_idx = head->prev_insn_idx; + elem = head->next; + free_verifier_state(&head->st, false); + kfree(head); env->head = elem; env->stack_size--; - return insn_idx; + return 0; } static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx) { + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; + int err; - elem = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); + elem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); if (!elem) goto err; - memcpy(&elem->st, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); elem->insn_idx = insn_idx; elem->prev_insn_idx = prev_insn_idx; elem->next = env->head; env->head = elem; env->stack_size++; + err = copy_verifier_state(&elem->st, cur); + if (err) + goto err; if (env->stack_size > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK) { - verbose("BPF program is too complex\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF program is too complex\n"); goto err; } return &elem->st; err: /* pop all elements and return */ - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); return NULL; } @@ -463,56 +426,192 @@ static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = { BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5 }; -static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +static void __mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *reg); + +/* Mark the unknown part of a register (variable offset or scalar value) as + * known to have the value @imm. + */ +static void __mark_reg_known(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u64 imm) { - BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG); + reg->id = 0; + reg->var_off = tnum_const(imm); + reg->smin_value = (s64)imm; + reg->smax_value = (s64)imm; + reg->umin_value = imm; + reg->umax_value = imm; +} - memset(®s[regno], 0, sizeof(regs[regno])); - regs[regno].type = NOT_INIT; - regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; +/* Mark the 'variable offset' part of a register as zero. This should be + * used only on registers holding a pointer type. + */ +static void __mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + __mark_reg_known(reg, 0); } -static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs) +static void mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) { - int i; + if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) { + verbose(env, "mark_reg_known_zero(regs, %u)\n", regno); + /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */ + for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++) + __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno); + return; + } + __mark_reg_known_zero(regs + regno); +} - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) - mark_reg_not_init(regs, i); +static bool reg_is_pkt_pointer(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + return type_is_pkt_pointer(reg->type); +} - /* frame pointer */ - regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = FRAME_PTR; +static bool reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + return reg_is_pkt_pointer(reg) || + reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END; +} - /* 1st arg to a function */ - regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX; +/* Unmodified PTR_TO_PACKET[_META,_END] register from ctx access. */ +static bool reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + enum bpf_reg_type which) +{ + /* The register can already have a range from prior markings. + * This is fine as long as it hasn't been advanced from its + * origin. + */ + return reg->type == which && + reg->id == 0 && + reg->off == 0 && + tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0); +} + +/* Attempts to improve min/max values based on var_off information */ +static void __update_reg_bounds(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + /* min signed is max(sign bit) | min(other bits) */ + reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, reg->smin_value, + reg->var_off.value | (reg->var_off.mask & S64_MIN)); + /* max signed is min(sign bit) | max(other bits) */ + reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, reg->smax_value, + reg->var_off.value | (reg->var_off.mask & S64_MAX)); + reg->umin_value = max(reg->umin_value, reg->var_off.value); + reg->umax_value = min(reg->umax_value, + reg->var_off.value | reg->var_off.mask); } -static void __mark_reg_unknown_value(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +/* Uses signed min/max values to inform unsigned, and vice-versa */ +static void __reg_deduce_bounds(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - regs[regno].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; - regs[regno].id = 0; - regs[regno].imm = 0; + /* Learn sign from signed bounds. + * If we cannot cross the sign boundary, then signed and unsigned bounds + * are the same, so combine. This works even in the negative case, e.g. + * -3 s<= x s<= -1 implies 0xf...fd u<= x u<= 0xf...ff. + */ + if (reg->smin_value >= 0 || reg->smax_value < 0) { + reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value = max_t(u64, reg->smin_value, + reg->umin_value); + reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value, + reg->umax_value); + return; + } + /* Learn sign from unsigned bounds. Signed bounds cross the sign + * boundary, so we must be careful. + */ + if ((s64)reg->umax_value >= 0) { + /* Positive. We can't learn anything from the smin, but smax + * is positive, hence safe. + */ + reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value; + reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value, + reg->umax_value); + } else if ((s64)reg->umin_value < 0) { + /* Negative. We can't learn anything from the smax, but smin + * is negative, hence safe. + */ + reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value = max_t(u64, reg->smin_value, + reg->umin_value); + reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value; + } } -static void mark_reg_unknown_value(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +/* Attempts to improve var_off based on unsigned min/max information */ +static void __reg_bound_offset(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - BUG_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG); - __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); + reg->var_off = tnum_intersect(reg->var_off, + tnum_range(reg->umin_value, + reg->umax_value)); } -static void reset_reg_range_values(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +/* Reset the min/max bounds of a register */ +static void __mark_reg_unbounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - regs[regno].min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - regs[regno].value_from_signed = false; - regs[regno].min_align = 0; + reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + reg->umin_value = 0; + reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; } -static void mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, - u32 regno) +/* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value. */ +static void __mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); - reset_reg_range_values(regs, regno); + reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE; + reg->id = 0; + reg->off = 0; + reg->var_off = tnum_unknown; + __mark_reg_unbounded(reg); +} + +static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +{ + if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) { + verbose(env, "mark_reg_unknown(regs, %u)\n", regno); + /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */ + for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++) + __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno); + return; + } + __mark_reg_unknown(regs + regno); +} + +static void __mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + __mark_reg_unknown(reg); + reg->type = NOT_INIT; +} + +static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) +{ + if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) { + verbose(env, "mark_reg_not_init(regs, %u)\n", regno); + /* Something bad happened, let's kill all regs */ + for (regno = 0; regno < MAX_BPF_REG; regno++) + __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno); + return; + } + __mark_reg_not_init(regs + regno); +} + +static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *regs) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { + mark_reg_not_init(env, regs, i); + regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + } + + /* frame pointer */ + regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = PTR_TO_STACK; + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_FP); + + /* 1st arg to a function */ + regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_CTX; + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_1); } enum reg_arg_type { @@ -521,28 +620,51 @@ enum reg_arg_type { DST_OP_NO_MARK /* same as above, check only, don't mark */ }; -static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, +static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + + if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) + /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */ + return; + + while (parent) { + /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ + if (state->regs[regno].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + break; + /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ + parent->regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; + } +} + +static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum reg_arg_type t) { + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state->regs; + if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) { - verbose("R%d is invalid\n", regno); + verbose(env, "R%d is invalid\n", regno); return -EINVAL; } if (t == SRC_OP) { /* check whether register used as source operand can be read */ if (regs[regno].type == NOT_INIT) { - verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno); + verbose(env, "R%d !read_ok\n", regno); return -EACCES; } + mark_reg_read(env->cur_state, regno); } else { /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) { - verbose("frame pointer is read only\n"); + verbose(env, "frame pointer is read only\n"); return -EACCES; } + regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; if (t == DST_OP) - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, regno); } return 0; } @@ -552,12 +674,11 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) switch (type) { case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL: - case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ: case PTR_TO_STACK: case PTR_TO_CTX: case PTR_TO_PACKET: + case PTR_TO_PACKET_META: case PTR_TO_PACKET_END: - case FRAME_PTR: case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP: return true; default: @@ -568,138 +689,178 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) /* check_stack_read/write functions track spill/fill of registers, * stack boundary and alignment are checked in check_mem_access() */ -static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, +static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - int i; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; + + err = realloc_verifier_state(state, round_up(slot + 1, BPF_REG_SIZE), + true); + if (err) + return err; /* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0, * so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && + state->stack[spi].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL && + size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { + verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); + return -EACCES; + } if (value_regno >= 0 && is_spillable_regtype(state->regs[value_regno].type)) { /* register containing pointer is being spilled into stack */ if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { - verbose("invalid size of register spill\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid size of register spill\n"); return -EACCES; } /* save register state */ - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] = - state->regs[value_regno]; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = state->regs[value_regno]; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_SPILL; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_SPILL; } else { /* regular write of data into stack */ - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] = - (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; for (i = 0; i < size; i++) - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_MISC; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] = + STACK_MISC; } return 0; } -static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, +static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slot) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + + while (parent) { + /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ + if (state->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + break; + /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ + parent->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; + } +} + +static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - u8 *slot_type; - int i; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + u8 *stype; - slot_type = &state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off]; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot) { + verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+0 size %d\n", + off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + stype = state->stack[spi].slot_type; - if (slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) { + if (stype[0] == STACK_SPILL) { if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { - verbose("invalid size of register spill\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid size of register spill\n"); return -EACCES; } for (i = 1; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) { - verbose("corrupted spill memory\n"); + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) { + verbose(env, "corrupted spill memory\n"); return -EACCES; } } - if (value_regno >= 0) + if (value_regno >= 0) { /* restore register state from stack */ - state->regs[value_regno] = - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + state->regs[value_regno] = state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; + mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi); + } return 0; } else { for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_MISC) { - verbose("invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_MISC) { + verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, size); return -EACCES; } } if (value_regno >= 0) /* have read misc data from the stack */ - mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs, - value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, state->regs, value_regno); return 0; } } /* check read/write into map element returned by bpf_map_lookup_elem() */ -static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, - int size) +static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, + int size, bool zero_size_allowed) { - struct bpf_map *map = env->cur_state.regs[regno].map_ptr; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_map *map = regs[regno].map_ptr; - if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || off + size > map->value_size) { - verbose("invalid access to map value, value_size=%d off=%d size=%d\n", + if (off < 0 || size < 0 || (size == 0 && !zero_size_allowed) || + off + size > map->value_size) { + verbose(env, "invalid access to map value, value_size=%d off=%d size=%d\n", map->value_size, off, size); return -EACCES; } return 0; } -/* check read/write into an adjusted map element */ -static int check_map_access_adj(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, - int off, int size) +/* check read/write into a map element with possible variable offset */ +static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, + int off, int size, bool zero_size_allowed) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; int err; - /* We adjusted the register to this map value, so we - * need to change off and size to min_value and max_value - * respectively to make sure our theoretical access will be - * safe. + /* We may have adjusted the register to this map value, so we + * need to try adding each of min_value and max_value to off + * to make sure our theoretical access will be safe. */ - if (log_level) - print_verifier_state(state); - env->varlen_map_value_access = true; + if (env->log.level) + print_verifier_state(env, state); /* The minimum value is only important with signed * comparisons where we can't assume the floor of a * value is 0. If we are using signed variables for our * index'es we need to make sure that whatever we use * will have a set floor within our range. */ - if (reg->min_value < 0) { - verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n", + if (reg->smin_value < 0) { + verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n", regno); return -EACCES; } - err = check_map_access(env, regno, reg->min_value + off, size); + err = __check_map_access(env, regno, reg->smin_value + off, size, + zero_size_allowed); if (err) { - verbose("R%d min value is outside of the array range\n", + verbose(env, "R%d min value is outside of the array range\n", regno); return err; } - /* If we haven't set a max value then we need to bail - * since we can't be sure we won't do bad things. + /* If we haven't set a max value then we need to bail since we can't be + * sure we won't do bad things. + * If reg->umax_value + off could overflow, treat that as unbounded too. */ - if (reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) { - verbose("R%d unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map\n", + if (reg->umax_value >= BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF) { + verbose(env, "R%d unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access into a map\n", regno); return -EACCES; } - return check_map_access(env, regno, reg->max_value + off, size); + err = __check_map_access(env, regno, reg->umax_value + off, size, + zero_size_allowed); + if (err) + verbose(env, "R%d max value is outside of the array range\n", + regno); + return err; } #define MAX_PACKET_OFF 0xffff @@ -719,6 +880,7 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT: case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP: case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB: if (meta) return meta->pkt_access; @@ -729,22 +891,50 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } } -static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, - int size) +static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, + int off, int size, bool zero_size_allowed) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; - off += reg->off; - if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || off + size > reg->range) { - verbose("invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, R%d(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)\n", + if (off < 0 || size < 0 || (size == 0 && !zero_size_allowed) || + (u64)off + size > reg->range) { + verbose(env, "invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, R%d(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)\n", off, size, regno, reg->id, reg->off, reg->range); return -EACCES; } return 0; } -/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields */ +static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, + int size, bool zero_size_allowed) +{ + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; + int err; + + /* We may have added a variable offset to the packet pointer; but any + * reg->range we have comes after that. We are only checking the fixed + * offset. + */ + + /* We don't allow negative numbers, because we aren't tracking enough + * detail to prove they're safe. + */ + if (reg->smin_value < 0) { + verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n", + regno); + return -EACCES; + } + err = __check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size, zero_size_allowed); + if (err) { + verbose(env, "R%d offset is outside of the packet\n", regno); + return err; + } + return err; +} + +/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields. Supports fixed offsets only */ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type) { @@ -752,12 +942,8 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, .reg_type = *reg_type, }; - /* for analyzer ctx accesses are already validated and converted */ - if (env->analyzer_ops) - return 0; - - if (env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access && - env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, &info)) { + if (env->ops->is_valid_access && + env->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, &info)) { /* A non zero info.ctx_field_size indicates that this field is a * candidate for later verifier transformation to load the whole * field and then apply a mask when accessed with a narrower @@ -765,16 +951,16 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, * will only allow for whole field access and rejects any other * type of narrower access. */ - env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = info.ctx_field_size; *reg_type = info.reg_type; + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = info.ctx_field_size; /* remember the offset of last byte accessed in ctx */ if (env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset < off + size) env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset = off + size; return 0; } - verbose("invalid bpf_context access off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); + verbose(env, "invalid bpf_context access off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); return -EACCES; } @@ -784,40 +970,25 @@ static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, if (allow_ptr_leaks) return false; - switch (reg->type) { - case UNKNOWN_VALUE: - case CONST_IMM: - return false; - default: - return true; - } + return reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE; } static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { - return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); + return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, cur_regs(env) + regno); } -static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, +static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size, bool strict) { + struct tnum reg_off; int ip_align; - int reg_off; /* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */ if (!strict || size == 1) return 0; - reg_off = reg->off; - if (reg->id) { - if (reg->aux_off_align % size) { - verbose("Packet access is only %u byte aligned, %d byte access not allowed\n", - reg->aux_off_align, size); - return -EACCES; - } - reg_off += reg->aux_off; - } - /* For platforms that do not have a Kconfig enabling * CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS the value of * NET_IP_ALIGN is universally set to '2'. And on platforms @@ -827,20 +998,39 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, * unconditional IP align value of '2'. */ ip_align = 2; - if ((ip_align + reg_off + off) % size != 0) { - verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n", - ip_align, reg_off, off, size); + + reg_off = tnum_add(reg->var_off, tnum_const(ip_align + reg->off + off)); + if (!tnum_is_aligned(reg_off, size)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, + "misaligned packet access off %d+%s+%d+%d size %d\n", + ip_align, tn_buf, reg->off, off, size); return -EACCES; } return 0; } -static int check_val_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, - int size, bool strict) +static int check_generic_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + const char *pointer_desc, + int off, int size, bool strict) { - if (strict && size != 1) { - verbose("Unknown alignment. Only byte-sized access allowed in value access.\n"); + struct tnum reg_off; + + /* Byte size accesses are always allowed. */ + if (!strict || size == 1) + return 0; + + reg_off = tnum_add(reg->var_off, tnum_const(reg->off + off)); + if (!tnum_is_aligned(reg_off, size)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, "misaligned %saccess off %s+%d+%d size %d\n", + pointer_desc, tn_buf, reg->off, off, size); return -EACCES; } @@ -852,21 +1042,29 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int size) { bool strict = env->strict_alignment; + const char *pointer_desc = ""; switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: - return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(reg, off, size, strict); - case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ: - return check_val_ptr_alignment(reg, size, strict); + case PTR_TO_PACKET_META: + /* Special case, because of NET_IP_ALIGN. Given metadata sits + * right in front, treat it the very same way. + */ + return check_pkt_ptr_alignment(env, reg, off, size, strict); + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + pointer_desc = "value "; + break; + case PTR_TO_CTX: + pointer_desc = "context "; + break; + case PTR_TO_STACK: + pointer_desc = "stack "; + break; default: - if (off % size != 0) { - verbose("misaligned access off %d size %d\n", - off, size); - return -EACCES; - } - - return 0; + break; } + return check_generic_ptr_alignment(env, reg, pointer_desc, off, size, + strict); } /* check whether memory at (regno + off) is accessible for t = (read | write) @@ -879,129 +1077,158 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; int size, err = 0; - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) - off += reg->imm; - size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size); if (size < 0) return size; + /* alignment checks will add in reg->off themselves */ err = check_ptr_alignment(env, reg, off, size); if (err) return err; - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE || - reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ) { + /* for access checks, reg->off is just part of off */ + off += reg->off; + + if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) { if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 && is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) { - verbose("R%d leaks addr into map\n", value_regno); + verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into map\n", value_regno); return -EACCES; } - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ) - err = check_map_access_adj(env, regno, off, size); - else - err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size); + err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size, false); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs, - value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) { - enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; + enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 && is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) { - verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno); + verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno); + return -EACCES; + } + /* ctx accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can + * determine what type of data were returned. + */ + if (reg->off) { + verbose(env, + "dereference of modified ctx ptr R%d off=%d+%d, ctx+const is allowed, ctx+const+const is not\n", + regno, reg->off, off - reg->off); + return -EACCES; + } + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) || reg->var_off.value) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, + "variable ctx access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d", + tn_buf, off, size); return -EACCES; } err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { - mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs, - value_regno); - /* note that reg.[id|off|range] == 0 */ - state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; - state->regs[value_regno].aux_off = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].aux_off_align = 0; + /* ctx access returns either a scalar, or a + * PTR_TO_PACKET[_META,_END]. In the latter + * case, we know the offset is zero. + */ + if (reg_type == SCALAR_VALUE) + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); + else + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, + value_regno); + regs[value_regno].id = 0; + regs[value_regno].off = 0; + regs[value_regno].range = 0; + regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; } - } else if (reg->type == FRAME_PTR || reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + /* stack accesses must be at a fixed offset, so that we can + * determine what type of data were returned. + * See check_stack_read(). + */ + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, "variable stack access var_off=%s off=%d size=%d", + tn_buf, off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + off += reg->var_off.value; if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) { - verbose("invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, size); + verbose(env, "invalid stack off=%d size=%d\n", off, + size); return -EACCES; } if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; - if (t == BPF_WRITE) { - if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off] == STACK_SPILL && - size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { - verbose("attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); - return -EACCES; - } - err = check_stack_write(state, off, size, value_regno); - } else { - err = check_stack_read(state, off, size, value_regno); - } - } else if (state->regs[regno].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { + if (t == BPF_WRITE) + err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, + value_regno); + else + err = check_stack_read(env, state, off, size, + value_regno); + } else if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(reg)) { if (t == BPF_WRITE && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, t)) { - verbose("cannot write into packet\n"); + verbose(env, "cannot write into packet\n"); return -EACCES; } if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 && is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) { - verbose("R%d leaks addr into packet\n", value_regno); + verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into packet\n", + value_regno); return -EACCES; } - err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size); + err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size, false); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs, - value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else { - verbose("R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", - regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]); + verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno, + reg_type_str[reg->type]); return -EACCES; } - if (!err && size <= 2 && value_regno >= 0 && env->allow_ptr_leaks && - state->regs[value_regno].type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) { - /* 1 or 2 byte load zero-extends, determine the number of - * zero upper bits. Not doing it fo 4 byte load, since - * such values cannot be added to ptr_to_packet anyway. - */ - state->regs[value_regno].imm = 64 - size * 8; + if (!err && size < BPF_REG_SIZE && value_regno >= 0 && t == BPF_READ && + regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { + /* b/h/w load zero-extends, mark upper bits as known 0 */ + regs[value_regno].var_off = + tnum_cast(regs[value_regno].var_off, size); + __update_reg_bounds(®s[value_regno]); } return err; } static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; int err; if ((BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W && BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) || insn->imm != 0) { - verbose("BPF_XADD uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_XADD uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { - verbose("R%d leaks addr into mem\n", insn->src_reg); + verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into mem\n", insn->src_reg); return -EACCES; } @@ -1016,34 +1243,50 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1); } +/* Does this register contain a constant zero? */ +static bool register_is_null(struct bpf_reg_state reg) +{ + return reg.type == SCALAR_VALUE && tnum_equals_const(reg.var_off, 0); +} + /* when register 'regno' is passed into function that will read 'access_size' * bytes from that pointer, make sure that it's within stack boundary - * and all elements of stack are initialized + * and all elements of stack are initialized. + * Unlike most pointer bounds-checking functions, this one doesn't take an + * 'off' argument, so it has to add in reg->off itself. */ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; - int off, i; + int off, i, slot, spi; if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK) { + /* Allow zero-byte read from NULL, regardless of pointer type */ if (zero_size_allowed && access_size == 0 && - regs[regno].type == CONST_IMM && - regs[regno].imm == 0) + register_is_null(regs[regno])) return 0; - verbose("R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno, + verbose(env, "R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno, reg_type_str[regs[regno].type], reg_type_str[PTR_TO_STACK]); return -EACCES; } - off = regs[regno].imm; + /* Only allow fixed-offset stack reads */ + if (!tnum_is_const(regs[regno].var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), regs[regno].var_off); + verbose(env, "invalid variable stack read R%d var_off=%s\n", + regno, tn_buf); + } + off = regs[regno].off + regs[regno].var_off.value; if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 || - access_size <= 0) { - verbose("invalid stack type R%d off=%d access_size=%d\n", + access_size < 0 || (access_size == 0 && !zero_size_allowed)) { + verbose(env, "invalid stack type R%d off=%d access_size=%d\n", regno, off, access_size); return -EACCES; } @@ -1058,8 +1301,12 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, } for (i = 0; i < access_size; i++) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] != STACK_MISC) { - verbose("invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", + slot = -(off + i) - 1; + spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot || + state->stack[spi].slot_type[slot % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + STACK_MISC) { + verbose(env, "invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, access_size); return -EACCES; } @@ -1071,16 +1318,17 @@ static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; - switch (regs[regno].type) { + switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: - return check_packet_access(env, regno, 0, access_size); + case PTR_TO_PACKET_META: + return check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off, access_size, + zero_size_allowed); case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: - return check_map_access(env, regno, 0, access_size); - case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ: - return check_map_access_adj(env, regno, 0, access_size); - default: /* const_imm|ptr_to_stack or invalid ptr */ + return check_map_access(env, regno, reg->off, access_size, + zero_size_allowed); + default: /* scalar_value|ptr_to_stack or invalid ptr */ return check_stack_boundary(env, regno, access_size, zero_size_allowed, meta); } @@ -1090,44 +1338,42 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = ®s[regno]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; enum bpf_reg_type expected_type, type = reg->type; int err = 0; if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE) return 0; - if (type == NOT_INIT) { - verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno); - return -EACCES; - } + err = check_reg_arg(env, regno, SRC_OP); + if (err) + return err; if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING) { if (is_pointer_value(env, regno)) { - verbose("R%d leaks addr into helper function\n", regno); + verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into helper function\n", + regno); return -EACCES; } return 0; } - if (type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + if (type_is_pkt_pointer(type) && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, meta, BPF_READ)) { - verbose("helper access to the packet is not allowed\n"); + verbose(env, "helper access to the packet is not allowed\n"); return -EACCES; } if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY || arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) { expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK; - if (type != PTR_TO_PACKET && type != expected_type) + if (!type_is_pkt_pointer(type) && + type != expected_type) goto err_type; } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE || arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO) { - expected_type = CONST_IMM; - /* One exception. Allow UNKNOWN_VALUE registers when the - * boundaries are known and don't cause unsafe memory accesses - */ - if (type != UNKNOWN_VALUE && type != expected_type) + expected_type = SCALAR_VALUE; + if (type != expected_type) goto err_type; } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) { expected_type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP; @@ -1138,20 +1384,23 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, if (type != expected_type) goto err_type; } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM || + arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL || arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM) { expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK; /* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be - * passed in as argument, it's a CONST_IMM type. Final test + * passed in as argument, it's a SCALAR_VALUE type. Final test * happens during stack boundary checking. */ - if (type == CONST_IMM && reg->imm == 0) + if (register_is_null(*reg) && + arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL) /* final test in check_stack_boundary() */; - else if (type != PTR_TO_PACKET && type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE && - type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ && type != expected_type) + else if (!type_is_pkt_pointer(type) && + type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE && + type != expected_type) goto err_type; meta->raw_mode = arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM; } else { - verbose("unsupported arg_type %d\n", arg_type); + verbose(env, "unsupported arg_type %d\n", arg_type); return -EFAULT; } @@ -1169,12 +1418,13 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, * we have to check map_key here. Otherwise it means * that kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier */ - verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->key\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid map_ptr to access map->key\n"); return -EACCES; } - if (type == PTR_TO_PACKET) - err = check_packet_access(env, regno, 0, - meta->map_ptr->key_size); + if (type_is_pkt_pointer(type)) + err = check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off, + meta->map_ptr->key_size, + false); else err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, meta->map_ptr->key_size, @@ -1185,12 +1435,13 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, */ if (!meta->map_ptr) { /* kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier */ - verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->value\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid map_ptr to access map->value\n"); return -EACCES; } - if (type == PTR_TO_PACKET) - err = check_packet_access(env, regno, 0, - meta->map_ptr->value_size); + if (type_is_pkt_pointer(type)) + err = check_packet_access(env, regno, reg->off, + meta->map_ptr->value_size, + false); else err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, meta->map_ptr->value_size, @@ -1205,14 +1456,16 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, */ if (regno == 0) { /* kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier */ - verbose("ARG_CONST_SIZE cannot be first argument\n"); + verbose(env, + "ARG_CONST_SIZE cannot be first argument\n"); return -EACCES; } - /* If the register is UNKNOWN_VALUE, the access check happens - * using its boundaries. Otherwise, just use its imm + /* The register is SCALAR_VALUE; the access check + * happens using its boundaries. */ - if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) { + + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could @@ -1220,45 +1473,39 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, */ meta = NULL; - if (reg->min_value < 0) { - verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'\n", - regno); - return -EACCES; - } - - if (reg->min_value == 0) { - err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, 0, - zero_size_allowed, - meta); - if (err) - return err; - } + if (reg->smin_value < 0) { + verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'\n", + regno); + return -EACCES; + } - if (reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) { - verbose("R%d unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'\n", - regno); - return -EACCES; - } - err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, - reg->max_value, - zero_size_allowed, meta); + if (reg->umin_value == 0) { + err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, 0, + zero_size_allowed, + meta); if (err) return err; - } else { - /* register is CONST_IMM */ - err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, reg->imm, - zero_size_allowed, meta); } + + if (reg->umax_value >= BPF_MAX_VAR_SIZ) { + verbose(env, "R%d unbounded memory access, use 'var &= const' or 'if (var < const)'\n", + regno); + return -EACCES; + } + err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno - 1, + reg->umax_value, + zero_size_allowed, meta); } return err; err_type: - verbose("R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno, + verbose(env, "R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno, reg_type_str[type], reg_type_str[expected_type]); return -EACCES; } -static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) +static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) { if (!map) return 0; @@ -1271,7 +1518,8 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) break; case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY: if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read && - func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output) + func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read_value) goto error; break; case BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE: @@ -1283,10 +1531,30 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) func_id != BPF_FUNC_current_task_under_cgroup) goto error; break; + /* devmap returns a pointer to a live net_device ifindex that we cannot + * allow to be modified from bpf side. So do not allow lookup elements + * for now. + */ + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_redirect_map) + goto error; + break; + /* Restrict bpf side of cpumap, open when use-cases appear */ + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_redirect_map) + goto error; + break; case BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS: case BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS: if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) goto error; + break; + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP: + if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_sock_map_update && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem) + goto error; + break; default: break; } @@ -1299,6 +1567,7 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) break; case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read: case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output: + case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read_value: if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY) goto error; break; @@ -1311,13 +1580,26 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id) if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY) goto error; break; + case BPF_FUNC_redirect_map: + if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP && + map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP) + goto error; + break; + case BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map: + if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) + goto error; + break; + case BPF_FUNC_sock_map_update: + if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) + goto error; + break; default: break; } return 0; error: - verbose("cannot pass map_type %d into func %s#%d\n", + verbose(env, "cannot pass map_type %d into func %s#%d\n", map->map_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id); return -EINVAL; } @@ -1340,55 +1622,55 @@ static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn) return count > 1 ? -EINVAL : 0; } +/* Packet data might have moved, any old PTR_TO_PACKET[_META,_END] + * are now invalid, so turn them into unknown SCALAR_VALUE. + */ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; int i; for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) - if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET || - regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, i); + if (reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(®s[i])) + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, i); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; - if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET && - reg->type != PTR_TO_PACKET_END) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - __mark_reg_unknown_value(state->spilled_regs, - i / BPF_REG_SIZE); + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; + if (reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(reg)) + __mark_reg_unknown(reg); } } static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; bool changes_data; int i, err; /* find function prototype */ if (func_id < 0 || func_id >= __BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID) { - verbose("invalid func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(func_id), func_id); + verbose(env, "invalid func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(func_id), + func_id); return -EINVAL; } - if (env->prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto) - fn = env->prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(func_id); + if (env->ops->get_func_proto) + fn = env->ops->get_func_proto(func_id); if (!fn) { - verbose("unknown func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(func_id), func_id); + verbose(env, "unknown func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(func_id), + func_id); return -EINVAL; } /* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible to use GPL-ed functions */ if (!env->prog->gpl_compatible && fn->gpl_only) { - verbose("cannot call GPL only function from proprietary program\n"); + verbose(env, "cannot call GPL only function from proprietary program\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -1402,7 +1684,7 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) */ err = check_raw_mode(fn); if (err) { - verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n", + verbose(env, "kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(func_id), func_id); return err; } @@ -1433,26 +1715,33 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) return err; } + regs = cur_regs(env); /* reset caller saved regs */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) - mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { + mark_reg_not_init(env, regs, caller_saved[i]); + check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK); + } - /* update return register */ + /* update return register (already marked as written above) */ if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) { - regs[BPF_REG_0].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; + /* sets type to SCALAR_VALUE */ + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0); } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_VOID) { regs[BPF_REG_0].type = NOT_INIT; } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) { struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux; regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL; - regs[BPF_REG_0].max_value = regs[BPF_REG_0].min_value = 0; + /* There is no offset yet applied, variable or fixed */ + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0); + regs[BPF_REG_0].off = 0; /* remember map_ptr, so that check_map_access() * can check 'value_size' boundary of memory access * to map element returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem() */ if (meta.map_ptr == NULL) { - verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier\n"); + verbose(env, + "kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier\n"); return -EINVAL; } regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr; @@ -1463,12 +1752,12 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) else if (insn_aux->map_ptr != meta.map_ptr) insn_aux->map_ptr = BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON; } else { - verbose("unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n", + verbose(env, "unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n", fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id); return -EINVAL; } - err = check_map_func_compatibility(meta.map_ptr, func_id); + err = check_map_func_compatibility(env, meta.map_ptr, func_id); if (err) return err; @@ -1477,485 +1766,554 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) return 0; } -static int check_packet_ptr_add(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_insn *insn) +static void coerce_reg_to_32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; - struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; - struct bpf_reg_state tmp_reg; - s32 imm; - - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - /* pkt_ptr += imm */ - imm = insn->imm; + /* clear high 32 bits */ + reg->var_off = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4); + /* Update bounds */ + __update_reg_bounds(reg); +} -add_imm: - if (imm < 0) { - verbose("addition of negative constant to packet pointer is not allowed\n"); - return -EACCES; - } - if (imm >= MAX_PACKET_OFF || - imm + dst_reg->off >= MAX_PACKET_OFF) { - verbose("constant %d is too large to add to packet pointer\n", - imm); - return -EACCES; - } - /* a constant was added to pkt_ptr. - * Remember it while keeping the same 'id' - */ - dst_reg->off += imm; - } else { - bool had_id; - - if (src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - /* R6=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62) R7=imm22; r7 += r6 */ - tmp_reg = *dst_reg; /* save r7 state */ - *dst_reg = *src_reg; /* copy pkt_ptr state r6 into r7 */ - src_reg = &tmp_reg; /* pretend it's src_reg state */ - /* if the checks below reject it, the copy won't matter, - * since we're rejecting the whole program. If all ok, - * then imm22 state will be added to r7 - * and r7 will be pkt(id=0,off=22,r=62) while - * r6 will stay as pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62) - */ - } +static bool signed_add_overflows(s64 a, s64 b) +{ + /* Do the add in u64, where overflow is well-defined */ + s64 res = (s64)((u64)a + (u64)b); - if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - /* pkt_ptr += reg where reg is known constant */ - imm = src_reg->imm; - goto add_imm; - } - /* disallow pkt_ptr += reg - * if reg is not uknown_value with guaranteed zero upper bits - * otherwise pkt_ptr may overflow and addition will become - * subtraction which is not allowed - */ - if (src_reg->type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) { - verbose("cannot add '%s' to ptr_to_packet\n", - reg_type_str[src_reg->type]); - return -EACCES; - } - if (src_reg->imm < 48) { - verbose("cannot add integer value with %lld upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet\n", - src_reg->imm); - return -EACCES; - } + if (b < 0) + return res > a; + return res < a; +} - had_id = (dst_reg->id != 0); +static bool signed_sub_overflows(s64 a, s64 b) +{ + /* Do the sub in u64, where overflow is well-defined */ + s64 res = (s64)((u64)a - (u64)b); - /* dst_reg stays as pkt_ptr type and since some positive - * integer value was added to the pointer, increment its 'id' - */ - dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; - - /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ - dst_reg->aux_off += dst_reg->off; - dst_reg->off = 0; - dst_reg->range = 0; - if (had_id) - dst_reg->aux_off_align = min(dst_reg->aux_off_align, - src_reg->min_align); - else - dst_reg->aux_off_align = src_reg->min_align; - } - return 0; + if (b < 0) + return res < a; + return res > a; } -static int evaluate_reg_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) +/* Handles arithmetic on a pointer and a scalar: computes new min/max and var_off. + * Caller should also handle BPF_MOV case separately. + * If we return -EACCES, caller may want to try again treating pointer as a + * scalar. So we only emit a diagnostic if !env->allow_ptr_leaks. + */ +static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn, + const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, + const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg; + bool known = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off); + s64 smin_val = off_reg->smin_value, smax_val = off_reg->smax_value, + smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value; + u64 umin_val = off_reg->umin_value, umax_val = off_reg->umax_value, + umin_ptr = ptr_reg->umin_value, umax_ptr = ptr_reg->umax_value; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); - s64 imm_log2; + u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; - /* for type == UNKNOWN_VALUE: - * imm > 0 -> number of zero upper bits - * imm == 0 -> don't track which is the same as all bits can be non-zero - */ + dst_reg = ®s[dst]; - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; - - if (src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && src_reg->imm > 0 && - dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) { - /* dreg += sreg - * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them - * can only result making one more bit non-zero - * in the larger value. - * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47) - * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47) - */ - dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, src_reg->imm); - dst_reg->imm--; - return 0; - } - if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM && src_reg->imm > 0 && - dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) { - /* dreg += sreg - * where dreg has zero upper bits and sreg is const. - * Adding them can only result making one more bit - * non-zero in the larger value. - */ - imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)src_reg->imm); - dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); - dst_reg->imm--; - return 0; - } - /* all other cases non supported yet, just mark dst_reg */ - dst_reg->imm = 0; - return 0; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (smin_val != smax_val))) { + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + verbose(env, + "verifier internal error: known but bad sbounds\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (umin_val != umax_val))) { + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + verbose(env, + "verifier internal error: known but bad ubounds\n"); + return -EINVAL; } - /* sign extend 32-bit imm into 64-bit to make sure that - * negative values occupy bit 63. Note ilog2() would have - * been incorrect, since sizeof(insn->imm) == 4 - */ - imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)insn->imm); - - if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_LSH) { - /* reg <<= imm - * if reg was a result of 2 byte load, then its imm == 48 - * which means that upper 48 bits are zero and shifting this reg - * left by 4 would mean that upper 44 bits are still zero - */ - dst_reg->imm -= insn->imm; - } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_MUL) { - /* reg *= imm - * if multiplying by 14 subtract 4 - * This is conservative calculation of upper zero bits. - * It's not trying to special case insn->imm == 1 or 0 cases - */ - dst_reg->imm -= imm_log2 + 1; - } else if (opcode == BPF_AND) { - /* reg &= imm */ - dst_reg->imm = 63 - imm_log2; - } else if (dst_reg->imm && opcode == BPF_ADD) { - /* reg += imm */ - dst_reg->imm = min(dst_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); - dst_reg->imm--; - } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH) { - /* reg >>= imm - * which means that after right shift, upper bits will be zero - * note that verifier already checked that - * 0 <= imm < 64 for shift insn - */ - dst_reg->imm += insn->imm; - if (unlikely(dst_reg->imm > 64)) - /* some dumb code did: - * r2 = *(u32 *)mem; - * r2 >>= 32; - * and all bits are zero now */ - dst_reg->imm = 64; - } else { - /* all other alu ops, means that we don't know what will - * happen to the value, mark it with unknown number of zero bits - */ - dst_reg->imm = 0; + if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) { + /* 32-bit ALU ops on pointers produce (meaningless) scalars */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, + "R%d 32-bit pointer arithmetic prohibited\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; } - if (dst_reg->imm < 0) { - /* all 64 bits of the register can contain non-zero bits - * and such value cannot be added to ptr_to_packet, since it - * may overflow, mark it as unknown to avoid further eval - */ - dst_reg->imm = 0; + if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) { + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL prohibited, null-check it first\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; + } + if (ptr_reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) { + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP prohibited\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; + } + if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_PACKET_END prohibited\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; } - return 0; -} -static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_insn *insn) -{ - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; - struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; - u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); - s64 imm_log2 = __ilog2_u64((long long)dst_reg->imm); - - /* BPF_X code with src_reg->type UNKNOWN_VALUE here. */ - if (src_reg->imm > 0 && dst_reg->imm) { - switch (opcode) { - case BPF_ADD: - /* dreg += sreg - * where both have zero upper bits. Adding them - * can only result making one more bit non-zero - * in the larger value. - * Ex. 0xffff (imm=48) + 1 (imm=63) = 0x10000 (imm=47) - * 0xffff (imm=48) + 0xffff = 0x1fffe (imm=47) - */ - dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); - dst_reg->imm--; - break; - case BPF_AND: - /* dreg &= sreg - * AND can not extend zero bits only shrink - * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff - * & 0x0f..ffffffff - * ---------------- - * 0x00..00ffffff - */ - dst_reg->imm = max(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); + /* In case of 'scalar += pointer', dst_reg inherits pointer type and id. + * The id may be overwritten later if we create a new variable offset. + */ + dst_reg->type = ptr_reg->type; + dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id; + + switch (opcode) { + case BPF_ADD: + /* We can take a fixed offset as long as it doesn't overflow + * the s32 'off' field + */ + if (known && (ptr_reg->off + smin_val == + (s64)(s32)(ptr_reg->off + smin_val))) { + /* pointer += K. Accumulate it into fixed offset */ + dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr; + dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr; + dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr; + dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr; + dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off; + dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off + smin_val; + dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range; break; - case BPF_OR: - /* dreg |= sreg - * OR can only extend zero bits - * Ex. 0x00..00ffffff - * | 0x0f..ffffffff - * ---------------- - * 0x0f..00ffffff - */ - dst_reg->imm = min(src_reg->imm, 63 - imm_log2); + } + /* A new variable offset is created. Note that off_reg->off + * == 0, since it's a scalar. + * dst_reg gets the pointer type and since some positive + * integer value was added to the pointer, give it a new 'id' + * if it's a PTR_TO_PACKET. + * this creates a new 'base' pointer, off_reg (variable) gets + * added into the variable offset, and we copy the fixed offset + * from ptr_reg. + */ + if (signed_add_overflows(smin_ptr, smin_val) || + signed_add_overflows(smax_ptr, smax_val)) { + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr + smin_val; + dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr + smax_val; + } + if (umin_ptr + umin_val < umin_ptr || + umax_ptr + umax_val < umax_ptr) { + dst_reg->umin_value = 0; + dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr + umin_val; + dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr + umax_val; + } + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off); + dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off; + if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) { + dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; + /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ + dst_reg->range = 0; + } + break; + case BPF_SUB: + if (dst_reg == off_reg) { + /* scalar -= pointer. Creates an unknown scalar */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d tried to subtract pointer from scalar\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; + } + /* We don't allow subtraction from FP, because (according to + * test_verifier.c test "invalid fp arithmetic", JITs might not + * be able to deal with it. + */ + if (ptr_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d subtraction from stack pointer prohibited\n", + dst); + return -EACCES; + } + if (known && (ptr_reg->off - smin_val == + (s64)(s32)(ptr_reg->off - smin_val))) { + /* pointer -= K. Subtract it from fixed offset */ + dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr; + dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr; + dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr; + dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr; + dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off; + dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id; + dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off - smin_val; + dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range; break; - case BPF_SUB: - case BPF_MUL: - case BPF_RSH: - case BPF_LSH: - /* These may be flushed out later */ - default: - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); } - } else { - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); - } - - dst_reg->type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; - return 0; -} - -static int evaluate_reg_imm_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_insn *insn) -{ - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; - struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; - u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); - u64 dst_imm = dst_reg->imm; - - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && src_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) - return evaluate_reg_imm_alu_unknown(env, insn); - - /* dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM here. Simulate execution of insns - * containing ALU ops. Don't care about overflow or negative - * values, just add/sub/... them; registers are in u64. - */ - if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm += insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm += src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_SUB && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm -= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_SUB && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm -= src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_MUL && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm *= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_MUL && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm *= src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_OR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm |= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_OR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm |= src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_AND && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm &= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_AND && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm &= src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm >>= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_RSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm >>= src_reg->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_LSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_imm <<= insn->imm; - } else if (opcode == BPF_LSH && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) { - dst_imm <<= src_reg->imm; - } else { - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); - goto out; + /* A new variable offset is created. If the subtrahend is known + * nonnegative, then any reg->range we had before is still good. + */ + if (signed_sub_overflows(smin_ptr, smax_val) || + signed_sub_overflows(smax_ptr, smin_val)) { + /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->smin_value = smin_ptr - smax_val; + dst_reg->smax_value = smax_ptr - smin_val; + } + if (umin_ptr < umax_val) { + /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ + dst_reg->umin_value = 0; + dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; + } else { + /* Cannot overflow (as long as bounds are consistent) */ + dst_reg->umin_value = umin_ptr - umax_val; + dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr - umin_val; + } + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off); + dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off; + if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) { + dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; + /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ + if (smin_val < 0) + dst_reg->range = 0; + } + break; + case BPF_AND: + case BPF_OR: + case BPF_XOR: + /* bitwise ops on pointers are troublesome, prohibit for now. + * (However, in principle we could allow some cases, e.g. + * ptr &= ~3 which would reduce min_value by 3.) + */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d bitwise operator %s on pointer prohibited\n", + dst, bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]); + return -EACCES; + default: + /* other operators (e.g. MUL,LSH) produce non-pointer results */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic with %s operator prohibited\n", + dst, bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]); + return -EACCES; } - dst_reg->imm = dst_imm; -out: + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); + __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg); + __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg); return 0; } -static void check_reg_overflow(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - if (reg->max_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - if (reg->min_value < BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE || - reg->min_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; -} - -static u32 calc_align(u32 imm) -{ - if (!imm) - return 1U << 31; - return imm - ((imm - 1) & imm); -} - -static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_insn *insn) +static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn, + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + struct bpf_reg_state src_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg; - s64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - u64 max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); - u32 dst_align, src_align; - - dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; - src_align = 0; - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - check_reg_overflow(®s[insn->src_reg]); - min_val = regs[insn->src_reg].min_value; - max_val = regs[insn->src_reg].max_value; - - /* If the source register is a random pointer then the - * min_value/max_value values represent the range of the known - * accesses into that value, not the actual min/max value of the - * register itself. In this case we have to reset the reg range - * values so we know it is not safe to look at. - */ - if (regs[insn->src_reg].type != CONST_IMM && - regs[insn->src_reg].type != UNKNOWN_VALUE) { - min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - src_align = 0; - } else { - src_align = regs[insn->src_reg].min_align; - } - } else if (insn->imm < BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE && - (s64)insn->imm > BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) { - min_val = max_val = insn->imm; - src_align = calc_align(insn->imm); - } - - dst_align = dst_reg->min_align; - - /* We don't know anything about what was done to this register, mark it - * as unknown. Also, if both derived bounds came from signed/unsigned - * mixed compares and one side is unbounded, we cannot really do anything - * with them as boundaries cannot be trusted. Thus, arithmetic of two - * regs of such kind will get invalidated bounds on the dst side. - */ - if ((min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || - (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - ((min_val != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || - (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - max_val != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || - (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - dst_reg->max_value == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) || - (dst_reg->min_value == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE && - dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) && - regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed != - regs[insn->src_reg].value_from_signed)) { - reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); - return; + bool src_known, dst_known; + s64 smin_val, smax_val; + u64 umin_val, umax_val; + + if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) { + /* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->64 */ + coerce_reg_to_32(dst_reg); + coerce_reg_to_32(&src_reg); } - - /* If one of our values was at the end of our ranges then we can't just - * do our normal operations to the register, we need to set the values - * to the min/max since they are undefined. - */ - if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + smin_val = src_reg.smin_value; + smax_val = src_reg.smax_value; + umin_val = src_reg.umin_value; + umax_val = src_reg.umax_value; + src_known = tnum_is_const(src_reg.var_off); + dst_known = tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off); switch (opcode) { case BPF_ADD: - if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value += min_val; - if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value += max_val; - dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align); + if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || + signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smax_val)) { + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->smin_value += smin_val; + dst_reg->smax_value += smax_val; + } + if (dst_reg->umin_value + umin_val < umin_val || + dst_reg->umax_value + umax_val < umax_val) { + dst_reg->umin_value = 0; + dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->umin_value += umin_val; + dst_reg->umax_value += umax_val; + } + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); break; case BPF_SUB: - if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value -= min_val; - if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value -= max_val; - dst_reg->min_align = min(src_align, dst_align); + if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || + signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smin_val)) { + /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->smin_value -= smax_val; + dst_reg->smax_value -= smin_val; + } + if (dst_reg->umin_value < umax_val) { + /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ + dst_reg->umin_value = 0; + dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; + } else { + /* Cannot overflow (as long as bounds are consistent) */ + dst_reg->umin_value -= umax_val; + dst_reg->umax_value -= umin_val; + } + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); break; case BPF_MUL: - if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value *= min_val; - if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value *= max_val; - dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align); + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_mul(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); + if (smin_val < 0 || dst_reg->smin_value < 0) { + /* Ain't nobody got time to multiply that sign */ + __mark_reg_unbounded(dst_reg); + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); + break; + } + /* Both values are positive, so we can work with unsigned and + * copy the result to signed (unless it exceeds S64_MAX). + */ + if (umax_val > U32_MAX || dst_reg->umax_value > U32_MAX) { + /* Potential overflow, we know nothing */ + __mark_reg_unbounded(dst_reg); + /* (except what we can learn from the var_off) */ + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); + break; + } + dst_reg->umin_value *= umin_val; + dst_reg->umax_value *= umax_val; + if (dst_reg->umax_value > S64_MAX) { + /* Overflow possible, we know nothing */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value; + dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value; + } break; case BPF_AND: - /* Disallow AND'ing of negative numbers, ain't nobody got time - * for that. Otherwise the minimum is 0 and the max is the max - * value we could AND against. + if (src_known && dst_known) { + __mark_reg_known(dst_reg, dst_reg->var_off.value & + src_reg.var_off.value); + break; + } + /* We get our minimum from the var_off, since that's inherently + * bitwise. Our maximum is the minimum of the operands' maxima. */ - if (min_val < 0) - dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - else - dst_reg->min_value = 0; - dst_reg->max_value = max_val; - dst_reg->min_align = max(src_align, dst_align); + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_and(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); + dst_reg->umin_value = dst_reg->var_off.value; + dst_reg->umax_value = min(dst_reg->umax_value, umax_val); + if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0 || smin_val < 0) { + /* Lose signed bounds when ANDing negative numbers, + * ain't nobody got time for that. + */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } else { + /* ANDing two positives gives a positive, so safe to + * cast result into s64. + */ + dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value; + dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value; + } + /* We may learn something more from the var_off */ + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); break; - case BPF_LSH: - /* Gotta have special overflow logic here, if we're shifting - * more than MAX_RANGE then just assume we have an invalid - * range. + case BPF_OR: + if (src_known && dst_known) { + __mark_reg_known(dst_reg, dst_reg->var_off.value | + src_reg.var_off.value); + break; + } + /* We get our maximum from the var_off, and our minimum is the + * maximum of the operands' minima */ - if (min_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) { - dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - dst_reg->min_align = 1; + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_or(dst_reg->var_off, src_reg.var_off); + dst_reg->umin_value = max(dst_reg->umin_value, umin_val); + dst_reg->umax_value = dst_reg->var_off.value | + dst_reg->var_off.mask; + if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0 || smin_val < 0) { + /* Lose signed bounds when ORing negative numbers, + * ain't nobody got time for that. + */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; } else { - if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - dst_reg->min_value <<= min_val; - if (!dst_reg->min_align) - dst_reg->min_align = 1; - dst_reg->min_align <<= min_val; - } - if (max_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) - dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - else if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value <<= max_val; + /* ORing two positives gives a positive, so safe to + * cast result into s64. + */ + dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value; + dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value; + } + /* We may learn something more from the var_off */ + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); break; - case BPF_RSH: - /* RSH by a negative number is undefined, and the BPF_RSH is an - * unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts. + case BPF_LSH: + if (umax_val > 63) { + /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes + * shifts by a negative number. + */ + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); + break; + } + /* We lose all sign bit information (except what we can pick + * up from var_off) */ - if (min_val < 0 || dst_reg->min_value < 0) { - dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + /* If we might shift our top bit out, then we know nothing */ + if (dst_reg->umax_value > 1ULL << (63 - umax_val)) { + dst_reg->umin_value = 0; + dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX; } else { - dst_reg->min_value = - (u64)(dst_reg->min_value) >> min_val; + dst_reg->umin_value <<= umin_val; + dst_reg->umax_value <<= umax_val; + } + if (src_known) + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val); + else + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val); + /* We may learn something more from the var_off */ + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); + break; + case BPF_RSH: + if (umax_val > 63) { + /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes + * shifts by a negative number. + */ + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); + break; } - if (min_val < 0) { - dst_reg->min_align = 1; + /* BPF_RSH is an unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts */ + if (dst_reg->smin_value < 0) { + if (umin_val) { + /* Sign bit will be cleared */ + dst_reg->smin_value = 0; + } else { + /* Lost sign bit information */ + dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; + dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; + } } else { - dst_reg->min_align >>= (u64) min_val; - if (!dst_reg->min_align) - dst_reg->min_align = 1; + dst_reg->smin_value = + (u64)(dst_reg->smin_value) >> umax_val; } - if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) - dst_reg->max_value >>= max_val; + if (src_known) + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off, + umin_val); + else + dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val); + dst_reg->umin_value >>= umax_val; + dst_reg->umax_value >>= umin_val; + /* We may learn something more from the var_off */ + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); break; default: - reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); break; } - check_reg_overflow(dst_reg); + __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg); + __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg); + return 0; +} + +/* Handles ALU ops other than BPF_END, BPF_NEG and BPF_MOV: computes new min/max + * and var_off. + */ +static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg, *src_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg = NULL, off_reg = {0}; + u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); + int rc; + + dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; + src_reg = NULL; + if (dst_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) + ptr_reg = dst_reg; + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { + src_reg = ®s[insn->src_reg]; + if (src_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) { + if (dst_reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) { + /* Combining two pointers by any ALU op yields + * an arbitrary scalar. + */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + verbose(env, "R%d pointer %s pointer prohibited\n", + insn->dst_reg, + bpf_alu_string[opcode >> 4]); + return -EACCES; + } + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); + return 0; + } else { + /* scalar += pointer + * This is legal, but we have to reverse our + * src/dest handling in computing the range + */ + rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn, + src_reg, dst_reg); + if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + /* scalar += unknown scalar */ + __mark_reg_unknown(&off_reg); + return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals( + env, insn, + dst_reg, off_reg); + } + return rc; + } + } else if (ptr_reg) { + /* pointer += scalar */ + rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn, + dst_reg, src_reg); + if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + /* unknown scalar += scalar */ + __mark_reg_unknown(dst_reg); + return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals( + env, insn, dst_reg, *src_reg); + } + return rc; + } + } else { + /* Pretend the src is a reg with a known value, since we only + * need to be able to read from this state. + */ + off_reg.type = SCALAR_VALUE; + __mark_reg_known(&off_reg, insn->imm); + src_reg = &off_reg; + if (ptr_reg) { /* pointer += K */ + rc = adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(env, insn, + ptr_reg, src_reg); + if (rc == -EACCES && env->allow_ptr_leaks) { + /* unknown scalar += K */ + __mark_reg_unknown(dst_reg); + return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals( + env, insn, dst_reg, off_reg); + } + return rc; + } + } + + /* Got here implies adding two SCALAR_VALUEs */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr_reg)) { + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unexpected ptr_reg\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (WARN_ON(!src_reg)) { + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: no src_reg\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + return adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(env, insn, dst_reg, *src_reg); } /* check validity of 32-bit and 64-bit arithmetic operations */ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -1964,30 +2322,31 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || insn->imm != 0) { - verbose("BPF_NEG uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_NEG uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } } else { if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || - (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64)) { - verbose("BPF_END uses reserved fields\n"); + (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64) || + BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) { + verbose(env, "BPF_END uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { - verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n", + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); return -EACCES; } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -1995,88 +2354,85 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off != 0) { - verbose("BPF_MOV uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_MOV uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } else { if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0) { - verbose("BPF_MOV uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_MOV uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; - /* we are setting our register to something new, we need to - * reset its range values. - */ - reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) { /* case: R1 = R2 * copy register state to dest reg */ regs[insn->dst_reg] = regs[insn->src_reg]; + regs[insn->dst_reg].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; } else { + /* R1 = (u32) R2 */ if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { - verbose("R%d partial copy of pointer\n", + verbose(env, + "R%d partial copy of pointer\n", insn->src_reg); return -EACCES; } - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); + /* high 32 bits are known zero. */ + regs[insn->dst_reg].var_off = tnum_cast( + regs[insn->dst_reg].var_off, 4); + __update_reg_bounds(®s[insn->dst_reg]); } } else { /* case: R = imm * remember the value we stored into this reg */ - regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM; - regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0; - regs[insn->dst_reg].max_value = insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].min_value = insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].min_align = calc_align(insn->imm); - regs[insn->dst_reg].value_from_signed = false; + regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; + __mark_reg_known(regs + insn->dst_reg, insn->imm); } } else if (opcode > BPF_END) { - verbose("invalid BPF_ALU opcode %x\n", opcode); + verbose(env, "invalid BPF_ALU opcode %x\n", opcode); return -EINVAL; } else { /* all other ALU ops: and, sub, xor, add, ... */ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off != 0) { - verbose("BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } else { if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0) { - verbose("BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } } /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if ((opcode == BPF_MOD || opcode == BPF_DIV) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K && insn->imm == 0) { - verbose("div by zero\n"); + verbose(env, "div by zero\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2085,306 +2441,330 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32; if (insn->imm < 0 || insn->imm >= size) { - verbose("invalid shift %d\n", insn->imm); + verbose(env, "invalid shift %d\n", insn->imm); return -EINVAL; } } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); if (err) return err; - dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; - - /* first we want to adjust our ranges. */ - adjust_reg_min_max_vals(env, insn); - - /* pattern match 'bpf_add Rx, imm' instruction */ - if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && - dst_reg->type == FRAME_PTR && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { - dst_reg->type = PTR_TO_STACK; - dst_reg->imm = insn->imm; - return 0; - } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && - BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && - dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && - ((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM) || - BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K)) { - if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) - dst_reg->imm += regs[insn->src_reg].imm; - else - dst_reg->imm += insn->imm; - return 0; - } else if (opcode == BPF_ADD && - BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && - (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET || - (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET))) { - /* ptr_to_packet += K|X */ - return check_packet_ptr_add(env, insn); - } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && - dst_reg->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && - env->allow_ptr_leaks) { - /* unknown += K|X */ - return evaluate_reg_alu(env, insn); - } else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && - dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM && - env->allow_ptr_leaks) { - /* reg_imm += K|X */ - return evaluate_reg_imm_alu(env, insn); - } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { - verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n", - insn->dst_reg); - return -EACCES; - } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && - is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { - verbose("R%d pointer arithmetic prohibited\n", - insn->src_reg); - return -EACCES; - } - - /* If we did pointer math on a map value then just set it to our - * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ type so we can deal with any stores or - * loads to this register appropriately, otherwise just mark the - * register as unknown. - */ - if (env->allow_ptr_leaks && - BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 && opcode == BPF_ADD && - (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE || - dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ)) - dst_reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ; - else - mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, insn->dst_reg); + return adjust_reg_min_max_vals(env, insn); } return 0; } static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, - struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg) + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + enum bpf_reg_type type, + bool range_right_open) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; + u16 new_range; int i; - /* LLVM can generate two kind of checks: + if (dst_reg->off < 0 || + (dst_reg->off == 0 && range_right_open)) + /* This doesn't give us any range */ + return; + + if (dst_reg->umax_value > MAX_PACKET_OFF || + dst_reg->umax_value + dst_reg->off > MAX_PACKET_OFF) + /* Risk of overflow. For instance, ptr + (1<<63) may be less + * than pkt_end, but that's because it's also less than pkt. + */ + return; + + new_range = dst_reg->off; + if (range_right_open) + new_range--; + + /* Examples for register markings: * - * Type 1: + * pkt_data in dst register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; * if (r2 > pkt_end) goto <handle exception> * <access okay> * + * r2 = r3; + * r2 += 8; + * if (r2 < pkt_end) goto <access okay> + * <handle exception> + * * Where: * r2 == dst_reg, pkt_end == src_reg * r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0) * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * - * Type 2: + * pkt_data in src register: * * r2 = r3; * r2 += 8; * if (pkt_end >= r2) goto <access okay> * <handle exception> * + * r2 = r3; + * r2 += 8; + * if (pkt_end <= r2) goto <handle exception> + * <access okay> + * * Where: * pkt_end == dst_reg, r2 == src_reg * r2=pkt(id=n,off=8,r=0) * r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=0) * * Find register r3 and mark its range as r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8) - * so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) is safe to access. + * or r3=pkt(id=n,off=0,r=8-1), so that range of bytes [r3, r3 + 8) + * and [r3, r3 + 8-1) respectively is safe to access depending on + * the check. */ + /* If our ids match, then we must have the same max_value. And we + * don't care about the other reg's fixed offset, since if it's too big + * the range won't allow anything. + * dst_reg->off is known < MAX_PACKET_OFF, therefore it fits in a u16. + */ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) - if (regs[i].type == PTR_TO_PACKET && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id) + if (regs[i].type == type && regs[i].id == dst_reg->id) /* keep the maximum range already checked */ - regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, dst_reg->off); + regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && reg->id == dst_reg->id) - reg->range = max(reg->range, dst_reg->off); + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; + if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id) + reg->range = max(reg->range, new_range); } } /* Adjusts the register min/max values in the case that the dst_reg is the * variable register that we are working on, and src_reg is a constant or we're * simply doing a BPF_K check. + * In JEQ/JNE cases we also adjust the var_off values. */ static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val, u8 opcode) { - bool value_from_signed = true; - bool is_range = true; + /* If the dst_reg is a pointer, we can't learn anything about its + * variable offset from the compare (unless src_reg were a pointer into + * the same object, but we don't bother with that. + * Since false_reg and true_reg have the same type by construction, we + * only need to check one of them for pointerness. + */ + if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) + return; switch (opcode) { case BPF_JEQ: /* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is * true then we know for sure. */ - true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val; - is_range = false; + __mark_reg_known(true_reg, val); break; case BPF_JNE: /* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false * we know the value for sure; */ - false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val; - is_range = false; + __mark_reg_known(false_reg, val); break; case BPF_JGT: - value_from_signed = false; - /* fallthrough */ + false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val); + true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val + 1); + break; case BPF_JSGT: - if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); - if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (opcode == BPF_JGT) { - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - false_reg->min_value = 0; - } - /* If this is false then we know the maximum val is val, - * otherwise we know the min val is val+1. - */ - false_reg->max_value = val; - false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; - true_reg->min_value = val + 1; - true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; + false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val); + true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val + 1); + break; + case BPF_JLT: + false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val); + true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val - 1); + break; + case BPF_JSLT: + false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val); + true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val - 1); break; case BPF_JGE: - value_from_signed = false; - /* fallthrough */ + false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val - 1); + true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val); + break; case BPF_JSGE: - if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); - if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (opcode == BPF_JGE) { - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - false_reg->min_value = 0; - } - /* If this is false then we know the maximum value is val - 1, - * otherwise we know the mimimum value is val. - */ - false_reg->max_value = val - 1; - false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; - true_reg->min_value = val; - true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; + false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val - 1); + true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val); + break; + case BPF_JLE: + false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val + 1); + true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val); + break; + case BPF_JSLE: + false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val + 1); + true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val); break; default: break; } - check_reg_overflow(false_reg); - check_reg_overflow(true_reg); - if (is_range) { - if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg)) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); - } + __reg_deduce_bounds(false_reg); + __reg_deduce_bounds(true_reg); + /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */ + __reg_bound_offset(false_reg); + __reg_bound_offset(true_reg); + /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds + * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc), + * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax. + */ + __update_reg_bounds(false_reg); + __update_reg_bounds(true_reg); } -/* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg is a CONST_IMM reg and src_reg - * is the variable reg. +/* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg holds a constant and src_reg is + * the variable reg. */ static void reg_set_min_max_inv(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg, struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg, u64 val, u8 opcode) { - bool value_from_signed = true; - bool is_range = true; + if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) + return; switch (opcode) { case BPF_JEQ: /* If this is false then we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is * true then we know for sure. */ - true_reg->max_value = true_reg->min_value = val; - is_range = false; + __mark_reg_known(true_reg, val); break; case BPF_JNE: /* If this is true we know nothing Jon Snow, but if it is false * we know the value for sure; */ - false_reg->max_value = false_reg->min_value = val; - is_range = false; + __mark_reg_known(false_reg, val); break; case BPF_JGT: - value_from_signed = false; - /* fallthrough */ + true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val - 1); + false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val); + break; case BPF_JSGT: - if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); - if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (opcode == BPF_JGT) { - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - true_reg->min_value = 0; - } - /* - * If this is false, then the val is <= the register, if it is - * true the register <= to the val. - */ - false_reg->min_value = val; - false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; - true_reg->max_value = val - 1; - true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; + true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val - 1); + false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val); + break; + case BPF_JLT: + true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val + 1); + false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val); + break; + case BPF_JSLT: + true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val + 1); + false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val); break; case BPF_JGE: - value_from_signed = false; - /* fallthrough */ + true_reg->umax_value = min(true_reg->umax_value, val); + false_reg->umin_value = max(false_reg->umin_value, val + 1); + break; case BPF_JSGE: - if (true_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); - if (false_reg->value_from_signed != value_from_signed) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (opcode == BPF_JGE) { - /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ - true_reg->min_value = 0; - } - /* If this is false then constant < register, if it is true then - * the register < constant. - */ - false_reg->min_value = val + 1; - false_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; - true_reg->max_value = val; - true_reg->value_from_signed = value_from_signed; + true_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, true_reg->smax_value, val); + false_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, false_reg->smin_value, val + 1); + break; + case BPF_JLE: + true_reg->umin_value = max(true_reg->umin_value, val); + false_reg->umax_value = min(false_reg->umax_value, val - 1); + break; + case BPF_JSLE: + true_reg->smin_value = max_t(s64, true_reg->smin_value, val); + false_reg->smax_value = min_t(s64, false_reg->smax_value, val - 1); break; default: break; } - check_reg_overflow(false_reg); - check_reg_overflow(true_reg); - if (is_range) { - if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg)) - reset_reg_range_values(false_reg, 0); - if (__is_pointer_value(false, true_reg)) - reset_reg_range_values(true_reg, 0); + __reg_deduce_bounds(false_reg); + __reg_deduce_bounds(true_reg); + /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */ + __reg_bound_offset(false_reg); + __reg_bound_offset(true_reg); + /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds + * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc), + * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax. + */ + __update_reg_bounds(false_reg); + __update_reg_bounds(true_reg); +} + +/* Regs are known to be equal, so intersect their min/max/var_off */ +static void __reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg, + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg) +{ + src_reg->umin_value = dst_reg->umin_value = max(src_reg->umin_value, + dst_reg->umin_value); + src_reg->umax_value = dst_reg->umax_value = min(src_reg->umax_value, + dst_reg->umax_value); + src_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->smin_value = max(src_reg->smin_value, + dst_reg->smin_value); + src_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->smax_value = min(src_reg->smax_value, + dst_reg->smax_value); + src_reg->var_off = dst_reg->var_off = tnum_intersect(src_reg->var_off, + dst_reg->var_off); + /* We might have learned new bounds from the var_off. */ + __update_reg_bounds(src_reg); + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); + /* We might have learned something about the sign bit. */ + __reg_deduce_bounds(src_reg); + __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg); + /* We might have learned some bits from the bounds. */ + __reg_bound_offset(src_reg); + __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg); + /* Intersecting with the old var_off might have improved our bounds + * slightly. e.g. if umax was 0x7f...f and var_off was (0; 0xf...fc), + * then new var_off is (0; 0x7f...fc) which improves our umax. + */ + __update_reg_bounds(src_reg); + __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg); +} + +static void reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_src, + struct bpf_reg_state *true_dst, + struct bpf_reg_state *false_src, + struct bpf_reg_state *false_dst, + u8 opcode) +{ + switch (opcode) { + case BPF_JEQ: + __reg_combine_min_max(true_src, true_dst); + break; + case BPF_JNE: + __reg_combine_min_max(false_src, false_dst); + break; } } static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id, - enum bpf_reg_type type) + bool is_null) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && reg->id == id) { - if (type == UNKNOWN_VALUE) { - __mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno); + /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should + * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer + * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->smin_value || reg->smax_value || + !tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0) || + reg->off)) { + __mark_reg_known_zero(reg); + reg->off = 0; + } + if (is_null) { + reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE; } else if (reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta) { reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP; reg->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr->inner_map_meta; } else { - reg->type = type; + reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE; } /* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we * should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances @@ -2398,60 +2778,153 @@ static void mark_map_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, u32 id, * be folded together at some point. */ static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno, - enum bpf_reg_type type) + bool is_null) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; u32 id = regs[regno].id; int i; for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) - mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, type); + mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - mark_map_reg(state->spilled_regs, i / BPF_REG_SIZE, id, type); + mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null); } } +static bool try_match_pkt_pointers(const struct bpf_insn *insn, + struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, + struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg, + struct bpf_verifier_state *this_branch, + struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch) +{ + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != BPF_X) + return false; + + switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) { + case BPF_JGT: + if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) || + (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META && + reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(src_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET))) { + /* pkt_data' > pkt_end, pkt_meta' > pkt_data */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, + dst_reg->type, false); + } else if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) || + (reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(dst_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET) && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META)) { + /* pkt_end > pkt_data', pkt_data > pkt_meta' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, src_reg, + src_reg->type, true); + } else { + return false; + } + break; + case BPF_JLT: + if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) || + (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META && + reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(src_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET))) { + /* pkt_data' < pkt_end, pkt_meta' < pkt_data */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, + dst_reg->type, true); + } else if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) || + (reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(dst_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET) && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META)) { + /* pkt_end < pkt_data', pkt_data > pkt_meta' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, src_reg, + src_reg->type, false); + } else { + return false; + } + break; + case BPF_JGE: + if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) || + (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META && + reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(src_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET))) { + /* pkt_data' >= pkt_end, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg, + dst_reg->type, true); + } else if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) || + (reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(dst_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET) && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META)) { + /* pkt_end >= pkt_data', pkt_data >= pkt_meta' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, src_reg, + src_reg->type, false); + } else { + return false; + } + break; + case BPF_JLE: + if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) || + (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META && + reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(src_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET))) { + /* pkt_data' <= pkt_end, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, dst_reg, + dst_reg->type, false); + } else if ((dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) || + (reg_is_init_pkt_pointer(dst_reg, PTR_TO_PACKET) && + src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META)) { + /* pkt_end <= pkt_data', pkt_data <= pkt_meta' */ + find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, src_reg, + src_reg->type, true); + } else { + return false; + } + break; + default: + return false; + } + + return true; +} + static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, int *insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->regs, *dst_reg; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; - if (opcode > BPF_EXIT) { - verbose("invalid BPF_JMP opcode %x\n", opcode); + if (opcode > BPF_JSLE) { + verbose(env, "invalid BPF_JMP opcode %x\n", opcode); return -EINVAL; } if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { if (insn->imm != 0) { - verbose("BPF_JMP uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_JMP uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { - verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", + verbose(env, "R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->src_reg); return -EACCES; } } else { if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0) { - verbose("BPF_JMP uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_JMP uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } } /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2460,7 +2933,8 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* detect if R == 0 where R was initialized to zero earlier */ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) && - dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM && dst_reg->imm == insn->imm) { + dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && + tnum_equals_const(dst_reg->var_off, insn->imm)) { if (opcode == BPF_JEQ) { /* if (imm == imm) goto pc+off; * only follow the goto, ignore fall-through @@ -2482,17 +2956,30 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* detect if we are comparing against a constant value so we can adjust * our min/max values for our dst register. + * this is only legit if both are scalars (or pointers to the same + * object, I suppose, but we don't support that right now), because + * otherwise the different base pointers mean the offsets aren't + * comparable. */ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - if (regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM) - reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], - dst_reg, regs[insn->src_reg].imm, - opcode); - else if (dst_reg->type == CONST_IMM) - reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg], - ®s[insn->src_reg], dst_reg->imm, - opcode); - } else { + if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && + regs[insn->src_reg].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { + if (tnum_is_const(regs[insn->src_reg].var_off)) + reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], + dst_reg, regs[insn->src_reg].var_off.value, + opcode); + else if (tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off)) + reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg], + ®s[insn->src_reg], + dst_reg->var_off.value, opcode); + else if (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) + /* Comparing for equality, we can combine knowledge */ + reg_combine_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->src_reg], + &other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], + ®s[insn->src_reg], + ®s[insn->dst_reg], opcode); + } + } else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) { reg_set_min_max(&other_branch->regs[insn->dst_reg], dst_reg, insn->imm, opcode); } @@ -2504,24 +2991,17 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* Mark all identical map registers in each branch as either * safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional. */ - mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg, - opcode == BPF_JEQ ? PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE : UNKNOWN_VALUE); - mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg, - opcode == BPF_JEQ ? UNKNOWN_VALUE : PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE); - } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGT && - dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && - regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(this_branch, dst_reg); - } else if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && opcode == BPF_JGE && - dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET_END && - regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET) { - find_good_pkt_pointers(other_branch, ®s[insn->src_reg]); - } else if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { - verbose("R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", insn->dst_reg); + mark_map_regs(this_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JNE); + mark_map_regs(other_branch, insn->dst_reg, opcode == BPF_JEQ); + } else if (!try_match_pkt_pointers(insn, dst_reg, ®s[insn->src_reg], + this_branch, other_branch) && + is_pointer_value(env, insn->dst_reg)) { + verbose(env, "R%d pointer comparison prohibited\n", + insn->dst_reg); return -EACCES; } - if (log_level) - print_verifier_state(this_branch); + if (env->log.level) + print_verifier_state(env, this_branch); return 0; } @@ -2536,28 +3016,27 @@ static struct bpf_map *ld_imm64_to_map_ptr(struct bpf_insn *insn) /* verify BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction */ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); int err; if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) { - verbose("invalid BPF_LD_IMM insn\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid BPF_LD_IMM insn\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (insn->off != 0) { - verbose("BPF_LD_IMM64 uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_LD_IMM64 uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; if (insn->src_reg == 0) { u64 imm = ((u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32) | (u32)insn->imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].type = CONST_IMM; - regs[insn->dst_reg].imm = imm; - regs[insn->dst_reg].id = 0; + regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; + __mark_reg_known(®s[insn->dst_reg], imm); return 0; } @@ -2598,47 +3077,89 @@ static bool may_access_skb(enum bpf_prog_type type) */ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code); int i, err; if (!may_access_skb(env->prog->type)) { - verbose("BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] instructions not allowed for this program type\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] instructions not allowed for this program type\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW || (mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) { - verbose("BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check whether implicit source operand (register R6) is readable */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if (regs[BPF_REG_6].type != PTR_TO_CTX) { - verbose("at the time of BPF_LD_ABS|IND R6 != pointer to skb\n"); + verbose(env, + "at the time of BPF_LD_ABS|IND R6 != pointer to skb\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (mode == BPF_IND) { /* check explicit source operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } /* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) - mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { + mark_reg_not_init(env, regs, caller_saved[i]); + check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK); + } /* mark destination R0 register as readable, since it contains - * the value fetched from the packet + * the value fetched from the packet. + * Already marked as written above. */ - regs[BPF_REG_0].type = UNKNOWN_VALUE; + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0); + return 0; +} + +static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_reg_state *reg; + struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1); + + switch (env->prog->type) { + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE: + break; + default: + return 0; + } + + reg = cur_regs(env) + BPF_REG_0; + if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) { + verbose(env, "At program exit the register R0 is not a known value (%s)\n", + reg_type_str[reg->type]); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!tnum_in(range, reg->var_off)) { + verbose(env, "At program exit the register R0 "); + if (!tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, "has value %s", tn_buf); + } else { + verbose(env, "has unknown scalar value"); + } + verbose(env, " should have been 0 or 1\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } @@ -2702,7 +3223,7 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return 0; if (w < 0 || w >= env->prog->len) { - verbose("jump out of range from insn %d to %d\n", t, w); + verbose(env, "jump out of range from insn %d to %d\n", t, w); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2719,13 +3240,13 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn_stack[cur_stack++] = w; return 1; } else if ((insn_state[w] & 0xF0) == DISCOVERED) { - verbose("back-edge from insn %d to %d\n", t, w); + verbose(env, "back-edge from insn %d to %d\n", t, w); return -EINVAL; } else if (insn_state[w] == EXPLORED) { /* forward- or cross-edge */ insn_state[t] = DISCOVERED | e; } else { - verbose("insn state internal bug\n"); + verbose(env, "insn state internal bug\n"); return -EFAULT; } return 0; @@ -2819,7 +3340,7 @@ peek_stack: mark_explored: insn_state[t] = EXPLORED; if (cur_stack-- <= 0) { - verbose("pop stack internal bug\n"); + verbose(env, "pop stack internal bug\n"); ret = -EFAULT; goto err_free; } @@ -2828,7 +3349,7 @@ mark_explored: check_state: for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) { if (insn_state[i] != EXPLORED) { - verbose("unreachable insn %d\n", i); + verbose(env, "unreachable insn %d\n", i); ret = -EINVAL; goto err_free; } @@ -2841,60 +3362,199 @@ err_free: return ret; } -/* the following conditions reduce the number of explored insns - * from ~140k to ~80k for ultra large programs that use a lot of ptr_to_packet +/* check %cur's range satisfies %old's */ +static bool range_within(struct bpf_reg_state *old, + struct bpf_reg_state *cur) +{ + return old->umin_value <= cur->umin_value && + old->umax_value >= cur->umax_value && + old->smin_value <= cur->smin_value && + old->smax_value >= cur->smax_value; +} + +/* Maximum number of register states that can exist at once */ +#define ID_MAP_SIZE (MAX_BPF_REG + MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE) +struct idpair { + u32 old; + u32 cur; +}; + +/* If in the old state two registers had the same id, then they need to have + * the same id in the new state as well. But that id could be different from + * the old state, so we need to track the mapping from old to new ids. + * Once we have seen that, say, a reg with old id 5 had new id 9, any subsequent + * regs with old id 5 must also have new id 9 for the new state to be safe. But + * regs with a different old id could still have new id 9, we don't care about + * that. + * So we look through our idmap to see if this old id has been seen before. If + * so, we require the new id to match; otherwise, we add the id pair to the map. */ -static bool compare_ptrs_to_packet(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_reg_state *old, - struct bpf_reg_state *cur) +static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct idpair *idmap) { - if (old->id != cur->id) - return false; + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ID_MAP_SIZE; i++) { + if (!idmap[i].old) { + /* Reached an empty slot; haven't seen this id before */ + idmap[i].old = old_id; + idmap[i].cur = cur_id; + return true; + } + if (idmap[i].old == old_id) + return idmap[i].cur == cur_id; + } + /* We ran out of idmap slots, which should be impossible */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return false; +} - /* old ptr_to_packet is more conservative, since it allows smaller - * range. Ex: - * old(off=0,r=10) is equal to cur(off=0,r=20), because - * old(off=0,r=10) means that with range=10 the verifier proceeded - * further and found no issues with the program. Now we're in the same - * spot with cur(off=0,r=20), so we're safe too, since anything further - * will only be looking at most 10 bytes after this pointer. - */ - if (old->off == cur->off && old->range < cur->range) +/* Returns true if (rold safe implies rcur safe) */ +static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, + struct idpair *idmap) +{ + if (!(rold->live & REG_LIVE_READ)) + /* explored state didn't use this */ return true; - /* old(off=20,r=10) is equal to cur(off=22,re=22 or 5 or 0) - * since both cannot be used for packet access and safe(old) - * pointer has smaller off that could be used for further - * 'if (ptr > data_end)' check - * Ex: - * old(off=20,r=10) and cur(off=22,r=22) and cur(off=22,r=0) mean - * that we cannot access the packet. - * The safe range is: - * [ptr, ptr + range - off) - * so whenever off >=range, it means no safe bytes from this pointer. - * When comparing old->off <= cur->off, it means that older code - * went with smaller offset and that offset was later - * used to figure out the safe range after 'if (ptr > data_end)' check - * Say, 'old' state was explored like: - * ... R3(off=0, r=0) - * R4 = R3 + 20 - * ... now R4(off=20,r=0) <-- here - * if (R4 > data_end) - * ... R4(off=20,r=20), R3(off=0,r=20) and R3 can be used to access. - * ... the code further went all the way to bpf_exit. - * Now the 'cur' state at the mark 'here' has R4(off=30,r=0). - * old_R4(off=20,r=0) equal to cur_R4(off=30,r=0), since if the verifier - * goes further, such cur_R4 will give larger safe packet range after - * 'if (R4 > data_end)' and all further insn were already good with r=20, - * so they will be good with r=30 and we can prune the search. - */ - if (!env->strict_alignment && old->off <= cur->off && - old->off >= old->range && cur->off >= cur->range) + if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, live)) == 0) return true; + if (rold->type == NOT_INIT) + /* explored state can't have used this */ + return true; + if (rcur->type == NOT_INIT) + return false; + switch (rold->type) { + case SCALAR_VALUE: + if (rcur->type == SCALAR_VALUE) { + /* new val must satisfy old val knowledge */ + return range_within(rold, rcur) && + tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off); + } else { + /* if we knew anything about the old value, we're not + * equal, because we can't know anything about the + * scalar value of the pointer in the new value. + */ + return rold->umin_value == 0 && + rold->umax_value == U64_MAX && + rold->smin_value == S64_MIN && + rold->smax_value == S64_MAX && + tnum_is_unknown(rold->var_off); + } + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + /* If the new min/max/var_off satisfy the old ones and + * everything else matches, we are OK. + * We don't care about the 'id' value, because nothing + * uses it for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE (only for ..._OR_NULL) + */ + return memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, id)) == 0 && + range_within(rold, rcur) && + tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off); + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL: + /* a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE could be safe to use as a + * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL into the same map. + * However, if the old PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL then got NULL- + * checked, doing so could have affected others with the same + * id, and we can't check for that because we lost the id when + * we converted to a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE. + */ + if (rcur->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) + return false; + if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, id))) + return false; + /* Check our ids match any regs they're supposed to */ + return check_ids(rold->id, rcur->id, idmap); + case PTR_TO_PACKET_META: + case PTR_TO_PACKET: + if (rcur->type != rold->type) + return false; + /* We must have at least as much range as the old ptr + * did, so that any accesses which were safe before are + * still safe. This is true even if old range < old off, + * since someone could have accessed through (ptr - k), or + * even done ptr -= k in a register, to get a safe access. + */ + if (rold->range > rcur->range) + return false; + /* If the offsets don't match, we can't trust our alignment; + * nor can we be sure that we won't fall out of range. + */ + if (rold->off != rcur->off) + return false; + /* id relations must be preserved */ + if (rold->id && !check_ids(rold->id, rcur->id, idmap)) + return false; + /* new val must satisfy old val knowledge */ + return range_within(rold, rcur) && + tnum_in(rold->var_off, rcur->var_off); + case PTR_TO_CTX: + case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP: + case PTR_TO_STACK: + case PTR_TO_PACKET_END: + /* Only valid matches are exact, which memcmp() above + * would have accepted + */ + default: + /* Don't know what's going on, just say it's not safe */ + return false; + } + + /* Shouldn't get here; if we do, say it's not safe */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return false; } +static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur, + struct idpair *idmap) +{ + int i, spi; + + /* if explored stack has more populated slots than current stack + * such stacks are not equivalent + */ + if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack) + return false; + + /* walk slots of the explored stack and ignore any additional + * slots in the current stack, since explored(safe) state + * didn't use them + */ + for (i = 0; i < old->allocated_stack; i++) { + spi = i / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_INVALID) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) + /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in + * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> + * this verifier states are not equivalent, + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (!regsafe(&old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + idmap)) + /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing + * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types + * are the same as well. + * Ex: explored safe path could have stored + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8} + * but current path has stored: + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16} + * such verifier states are not equivalent. + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + } + return true; +} + /* compare two verifier states * * all states stored in state_list are known to be valid, since @@ -2925,84 +3585,101 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *old, struct bpf_verifier_state *cur) { - bool varlen_map_access = env->varlen_map_value_access; - struct bpf_reg_state *rold, *rcur; + struct idpair *idmap; + bool ret = false; int i; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { - rold = &old->regs[i]; - rcur = &cur->regs[i]; + idmap = kcalloc(ID_MAP_SIZE, sizeof(struct idpair), GFP_KERNEL); + /* If we failed to allocate the idmap, just say it's not safe */ + if (!idmap) + return false; - if (memcmp(rold, rcur, sizeof(*rold)) == 0) - continue; + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { + if (!regsafe(&old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i], idmap)) + goto out_free; + } - /* If the ranges were not the same, but everything else was and - * we didn't do a variable access into a map then we are a-ok. - */ - if (!varlen_map_access && - memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetofend(struct bpf_reg_state, id)) == 0) - continue; + if (!stacksafe(old, cur, idmap)) + goto out_free; + ret = true; +out_free: + kfree(idmap); + return ret; +} - /* If we didn't map access then again we don't care about the - * mismatched range values and it's ok if our old type was - * UNKNOWN and we didn't go to a NOT_INIT'ed reg. - */ - if (rold->type == NOT_INIT || - (!varlen_map_access && rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && - rcur->type != NOT_INIT)) - continue; +/* A write screens off any subsequent reads; but write marks come from the + * straight-line code between a state and its parent. When we arrive at a + * jump target (in the first iteration of the propagate_liveness() loop), + * we didn't arrive by the straight-line code, so read marks in state must + * propagate to parent regardless of state's write marks. + */ +static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) +{ + bool writes = parent == state->parent; /* Observe write marks */ + bool touched = false; /* any changes made? */ + int i; - /* Don't care about the reg->id in this case. */ - if (rold->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && - rcur->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL && - rold->map_ptr == rcur->map_ptr) + if (!parent) + return touched; + /* Propagate read liveness of registers... */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_FP + 1 != MAX_BPF_REG); + /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */ + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) { + if (parent->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) continue; - - if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && - compare_ptrs_to_packet(env, rold, rcur)) + if (writes && (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) continue; - - return false; + if (state->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + touched = true; + } } - - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i++) { - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_INVALID) + /* ... and stack slots */ + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE && + i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (parent->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != cur->stack_slot_type[i]) - /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in - * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> - * this verifier states are not equivalent, - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - return false; - if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + if (parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) continue; - if (memcmp(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - sizeof(old->spilled_regs[0]))) - /* when explored and current stack slot types are - * the same, check that stored pointers types - * are the same as well. - * Ex: explored safe path could have stored - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .imm = -8} - * but current path has stored: - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .imm = -16} - * such verifier states are not equivalent. - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - return false; - else + if (writes && + (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) continue; + if (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + touched = true; + } + } + return touched; +} + +/* "parent" is "a state from which we reach the current state", but initially + * it is not the state->parent (i.e. "the state whose straight-line code leads + * to the current state"), instead it is the state that happened to arrive at + * a (prunable) equivalent of the current state. See comment above + * do_propagate_liveness() for consequences of this. + * This function is just a more efficient way of calling mark_reg_read() or + * mark_stack_slot_read() on each reg in "parent" that is read in "state", + * though it requires that parent != state->parent in the call arguments. + */ +static void propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) +{ + while (do_propagate_liveness(state, parent)) { + /* Something changed, so we need to feed those changes onward */ + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; } - return true; } static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + int i, err; sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; if (!sl) @@ -3012,11 +3689,20 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) return 0; while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { - if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) + if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, cur)) { /* reached equivalent register/stack state, - * prune the search + * prune the search. + * Registers read by the continuation are read by us. + * If we have any write marks in env->cur_state, they + * will prevent corresponding reads in the continuation + * from reaching our parent (an explored_state). Our + * own state will get the read marks recorded, but + * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning + * this state and will pop a new one. */ + propagate_liveness(&sl->state, cur); return 1; + } sl = sl->next; } @@ -3026,46 +3712,68 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * it will be rejected. Since there are no loops, we won't be * seeing this 'insn_idx' instruction again on the way to bpf_exit */ - new_sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_USER); + new_sl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_sl) return -ENOMEM; /* add new state to the head of linked list */ - memcpy(&new_sl->state, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); + err = copy_verifier_state(&new_sl->state, cur); + if (err) { + free_verifier_state(&new_sl->state, false); + kfree(new_sl); + return err; + } new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl; + /* connect new state to parentage chain */ + cur->parent = &new_sl->state; + /* clear write marks in current state: the writes we did are not writes + * our child did, so they don't screen off its reads from us. + * (There are no read marks in current state, because reads always mark + * their parent and current state never has children yet. Only + * explored_states can get read marks.) + */ + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) + cur->regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + for (i = 0; i < cur->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + if (cur->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + cur->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live = REG_LIVE_NONE; return 0; } static int ext_analyzer_insn_hook(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx) { - if (!env->analyzer_ops || !env->analyzer_ops->insn_hook) - return 0; + if (env->dev_ops && env->dev_ops->insn_hook) + return env->dev_ops->insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx); - return env->analyzer_ops->insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx); + return 0; } static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state; struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; int insn_idx, prev_insn_idx = 0; int insn_processed = 0; bool do_print_state = false; - init_reg_state(regs); + state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!state) + return -ENOMEM; + env->cur_state = state; + init_reg_state(env, state->regs); + state->parent = NULL; insn_idx = 0; - env->varlen_map_value_access = false; for (;;) { struct bpf_insn *insn; u8 class; int err; if (insn_idx >= insn_cnt) { - verbose("invalid insn idx %d insn_cnt %d\n", + verbose(env, "invalid insn idx %d insn_cnt %d\n", insn_idx, insn_cnt); return -EFAULT; } @@ -3074,7 +3782,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code); if (++insn_processed > BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS) { - verbose("BPF program is too large. Processed %d insn\n", + verbose(env, + "BPF program is too large. Processed %d insn\n", insn_processed); return -E2BIG; } @@ -3084,12 +3793,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; if (err == 1) { /* found equivalent state, can prune the search */ - if (log_level) { + if (env->log.level) { if (do_print_state) - verbose("\nfrom %d to %d: safe\n", + verbose(env, "\nfrom %d to %d: safe\n", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); else - verbose("%d: safe\n", insn_idx); + verbose(env, "%d: safe\n", insn_idx); } goto process_bpf_exit; } @@ -3097,25 +3806,28 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (need_resched()) cond_resched(); - if (log_level > 1 || (log_level && do_print_state)) { - if (log_level > 1) - verbose("%d:", insn_idx); + if (env->log.level > 1 || (env->log.level && do_print_state)) { + if (env->log.level > 1) + verbose(env, "%d:", insn_idx); else - verbose("\nfrom %d to %d:", + verbose(env, "\nfrom %d to %d:", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); - print_verifier_state(&env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); do_print_state = false; } - if (log_level) { - verbose("%d: ", insn_idx); - print_bpf_insn(env, insn); + if (env->log.level) { + verbose(env, "%d: ", insn_idx); + print_bpf_insn(verbose, env, insn, + env->allow_ptr_leaks); } err = ext_analyzer_insn_hook(env, insn_idx, prev_insn_idx); if (err) return err; + regs = cur_regs(env); + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { err = check_alu_op(env, insn); if (err) @@ -3127,11 +3839,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) /* check for reserved fields is already done */ /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); if (err) return err; @@ -3165,7 +3877,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * src_reg == stack|map in some other branch. * Reject it. */ - verbose("same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n"); + verbose(env, "same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3181,11 +3893,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -3205,18 +3917,18 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } else if (dst_reg_type != *prev_dst_type && (dst_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX || *prev_dst_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) { - verbose("same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n"); + verbose(env, "same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n"); return -EINVAL; } } else if (class == BPF_ST) { if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0) { - verbose("BPF_ST uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_ST uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -3235,7 +3947,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn->off != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) { - verbose("BPF_CALL uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_CALL uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3248,7 +3960,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn->imm != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) { - verbose("BPF_JA uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_JA uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3260,7 +3972,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn->imm != 0 || insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) { - verbose("BPF_EXIT uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_EXIT uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3270,18 +3982,23 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * of bpf_exit, which means that program wrote * something into it earlier */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; if (is_pointer_value(env, BPF_REG_0)) { - verbose("R0 leaks addr as return value\n"); + verbose(env, "R0 leaks addr as return value\n"); return -EACCES; } + err = check_return_code(env); + if (err) + return err; process_bpf_exit: - insn_idx = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx); - if (insn_idx < 0) { + err = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx, &insn_idx); + if (err < 0) { + if (err != -ENOENT) + return err; break; } else { do_print_state = true; @@ -3306,21 +4023,21 @@ process_bpf_exit: return err; insn_idx++; + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; } else { - verbose("invalid BPF_LD mode\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid BPF_LD mode\n"); return -EINVAL; } - reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); } else { - verbose("unknown insn class %d\n", class); + verbose(env, "unknown insn class %d\n", class); return -EINVAL; } insn_idx++; } - verbose("processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n", - insn_processed, env->prog->aux->stack_depth); + verbose(env, "processed %d insns, stack depth %d\n", insn_processed, + env->prog->aux->stack_depth); return 0; } @@ -3332,7 +4049,8 @@ static int check_map_prealloc(struct bpf_map *map) !(map->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); } -static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, +static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog) { @@ -3343,12 +4061,12 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, */ if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) { if (!check_map_prealloc(map)) { - verbose("perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n"); + verbose(env, "perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (map->inner_map_meta && !check_map_prealloc(map->inner_map_meta)) { - verbose("perf_event programs can only use preallocated inner hash map\n"); + verbose(env, "perf_event programs can only use preallocated inner hash map\n"); return -EINVAL; } } @@ -3371,14 +4089,14 @@ static int replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) { if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX && (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM || insn->imm != 0)) { - verbose("BPF_LDX uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_LDX uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_STX && ((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_XADD) || insn->imm != 0)) { - verbose("BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n"); + verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3389,7 +4107,7 @@ static int replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (i == insn_cnt - 1 || insn[1].code != 0 || insn[1].dst_reg != 0 || insn[1].src_reg != 0 || insn[1].off != 0) { - verbose("invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn\n"); + verbose(env, "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3398,19 +4116,20 @@ static int replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) goto next_insn; if (insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD) { - verbose("unrecognized bpf_ld_imm64 insn\n"); + verbose(env, + "unrecognized bpf_ld_imm64 insn\n"); return -EINVAL; } f = fdget(insn->imm); map = __bpf_map_get(f); if (IS_ERR(map)) { - verbose("fd %d is not pointing to valid bpf_map\n", + verbose(env, "fd %d is not pointing to valid bpf_map\n", insn->imm); return PTR_ERR(map); } - err = check_map_prog_compatibility(map, env->prog); + err = check_map_prog_compatibility(env, map, env->prog); if (err) { fdput(f); return err; @@ -3487,6 +4206,7 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len, u32 off, u32 cnt) { struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + int i; if (cnt == 1) return 0; @@ -3496,6 +4216,8 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len, memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); + for (i = off; i < off + cnt - 1; i++) + new_data[i].seen = true; env->insn_aux_data = new_data; vfree(old_data); return 0; @@ -3514,12 +4236,31 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of return new_prog; } +/* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not explore + * branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can have dead code + * too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code with nops. + */ +static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data; + struct bpf_insn nop = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0); + struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi; + const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) { + if (aux_data[i].seen) + continue; + memcpy(insn + i, &nop, sizeof(nop)); + } +} + /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff' * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff' */ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops = env->prog->aux->ops; + const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops = env->ops; int i, cnt, size, ctx_field_size, delta = 0; const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16], *insn; @@ -3532,7 +4273,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) cnt = ops->gen_prologue(insn_buf, env->seen_direct_write, env->prog); if (cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { - verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); + verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } else if (cnt) { new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, 0, insn_buf, cnt); @@ -3580,7 +4321,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) u8 size_code; if (type == BPF_WRITE) { - verbose("bpf verifier narrow ctx access misconfigured\n"); + verbose(env, "bpf verifier narrow ctx access misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3599,7 +4340,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) &target_size); if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) || (ctx_field_size && !target_size)) { - verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); + verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3669,7 +4410,11 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) continue; } - if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) { + /* BPF_EMIT_CALL() assumptions in some of the map_gen_lookup + * handlers are currently limited to 64 bit only. + */ + if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && + insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) { map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr; if (map_ptr == BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON || !map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup) @@ -3677,7 +4422,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) cnt = map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup(map_ptr, insn_buf); if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) { - verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); + verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3694,13 +4439,35 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) continue; } + if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_redirect_map) { + /* Note, we cannot use prog directly as imm as subsequent + * rewrites would still change the prog pointer. The only + * stable address we can use is aux, which also works with + * prog clones during blinding. + */ + u64 addr = (unsigned long)prog->aux; + struct bpf_insn r4_ld[] = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_4, addr), + *insn, + }; + cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(r4_ld); + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, r4_ld, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + } patch_call_imm: - fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm); + fn = env->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm); /* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions */ if (!fn->func) { - verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n", + verbose(env, + "kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n", func_id_name(insn->imm), insn->imm); return -EFAULT; } @@ -3724,6 +4491,7 @@ static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (sl) while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { sln = sl->next; + free_verifier_state(&sl->state, false); kfree(sl); sl = sln; } @@ -3734,16 +4502,21 @@ static void free_states(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) { - char __user *log_ubuf = NULL; struct bpf_verifier_env *env; + struct bpf_verifer_log *log; int ret = -EINVAL; + /* no program is valid */ + if (ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_verifier_ops) == 0) + return -EINVAL; + /* 'struct bpf_verifier_env' can be global, but since it's not small, * allocate/free it every time bpf_check() is called */ env = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_env), GFP_KERNEL); if (!env) return -ENOMEM; + log = &env->log; env->insn_aux_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (*prog)->len); @@ -3751,6 +4524,7 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) if (!env->insn_aux_data) goto err_free_env; env->prog = *prog; + env->ops = bpf_verifier_ops[env->prog->type]; /* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */ mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); @@ -3759,29 +4533,27 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) /* user requested verbose verifier output * and supplied buffer to store the verification trace */ - log_level = attr->log_level; - log_ubuf = (char __user *) (unsigned long) attr->log_buf; - log_size = attr->log_size; - log_len = 0; + log->level = attr->log_level; + log->ubuf = (char __user *) (unsigned long) attr->log_buf; + log->len_total = attr->log_size; ret = -EINVAL; - /* log_* values have to be sane */ - if (log_size < 128 || log_size > UINT_MAX >> 8 || - log_level == 0 || log_ubuf == NULL) - goto err_unlock; - - ret = -ENOMEM; - log_buf = vmalloc(log_size); - if (!log_buf) + /* log attributes have to be sane */ + if (log->len_total < 128 || log->len_total > UINT_MAX >> 8 || + !log->level || !log->ubuf) goto err_unlock; - } else { - log_level = 0; } env->strict_alignment = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT); if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) env->strict_alignment = true; + if (env->prog->aux->offload) { + ret = bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep(env); + if (ret) + goto err_unlock; + } + ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env); if (ret < 0) goto skip_full_check; @@ -3800,29 +4572,30 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); ret = do_check(env); + if (env->cur_state) { + free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true); + env->cur_state = NULL; + } skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); if (ret == 0) + sanitize_dead_code(env); + + if (ret == 0) /* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */ ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env); if (ret == 0) ret = fixup_bpf_calls(env); - if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) { - BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size); - /* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */ + if (log->level && bpf_verifier_log_full(log)) ret = -ENOSPC; - /* fall through to return what was recorded */ - } - - /* copy verifier log back to user space including trailing zero */ - if (log_level && copy_to_user(log_ubuf, log_buf, log_len + 1) != 0) { + if (log->level && !log->ubuf) { ret = -EFAULT; - goto free_log_buf; + goto err_release_maps; } if (ret == 0 && env->used_map_cnt) { @@ -3833,7 +4606,7 @@ skip_full_check: if (!env->prog->aux->used_maps) { ret = -ENOMEM; - goto free_log_buf; + goto err_release_maps; } memcpy(env->prog->aux->used_maps, env->used_maps, @@ -3846,9 +4619,7 @@ skip_full_check: convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(env); } -free_log_buf: - if (log_level) - vfree(log_buf); +err_release_maps: if (!env->prog->aux->used_maps) /* if we didn't copy map pointers into bpf_prog_info, release * them now. Otherwise free_bpf_prog_info() will release them. @@ -3862,58 +4633,3 @@ err_free_env: kfree(env); return ret; } - -int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, - void *priv) -{ - struct bpf_verifier_env *env; - int ret; - - env = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_env), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!env) - return -ENOMEM; - - env->insn_aux_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * - prog->len); - ret = -ENOMEM; - if (!env->insn_aux_data) - goto err_free_env; - env->prog = prog; - env->analyzer_ops = ops; - env->analyzer_priv = priv; - - /* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */ - mutex_lock(&bpf_verifier_lock); - - log_level = 0; - - env->strict_alignment = false; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) - env->strict_alignment = true; - - env->explored_states = kcalloc(env->prog->len, - sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list *), - GFP_KERNEL); - ret = -ENOMEM; - if (!env->explored_states) - goto skip_full_check; - - ret = check_cfg(env); - if (ret < 0) - goto skip_full_check; - - env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); - - ret = do_check(env); - -skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); - free_states(env); - - mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); - vfree(env->insn_aux_data); -err_free_env: - kfree(env); - return ret; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_analyzer); |