summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bluetooth/smp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth/smp.c')
-rw-r--r--net/bluetooth/smp.c279
1 files changed, 172 insertions, 107 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index f2829a7932e2..e49c83d8b957 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -35,11 +35,13 @@
#define AUTH_REQ_MASK 0x07
-#define SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID 1
-#define SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING 2
-#define SMP_FLAG_MITM_AUTH 3
-#define SMP_FLAG_COMPLETE 4
-#define SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR 5
+enum {
+ SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID,
+ SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING,
+ SMP_FLAG_MITM_AUTH,
+ SMP_FLAG_COMPLETE,
+ SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR,
+};
struct smp_chan {
struct l2cap_conn *conn;
@@ -60,20 +62,16 @@ struct smp_chan {
struct smp_ltk *slave_ltk;
struct smp_irk *remote_irk;
unsigned long flags;
+
+ struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm_aes;
};
-static inline void swap128(const u8 src[16], u8 dst[16])
+static inline void swap_buf(const u8 *src, u8 *dst, size_t len)
{
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
- dst[15 - i] = src[i];
-}
+ size_t i;
-static inline void swap56(const u8 src[7], u8 dst[7])
-{
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
- dst[6 - i] = src[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ dst[len - 1 - i] = src[i];
}
static int smp_e(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 *k, u8 *r)
@@ -92,7 +90,7 @@ static int smp_e(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 *k, u8 *r)
desc.flags = 0;
/* The most significant octet of key corresponds to k[0] */
- swap128(k, tmp);
+ swap_buf(k, tmp, 16);
err = crypto_blkcipher_setkey(tfm, tmp, 16);
if (err) {
@@ -101,7 +99,7 @@ static int smp_e(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 *k, u8 *r)
}
/* Most significant octet of plaintextData corresponds to data[0] */
- swap128(r, data);
+ swap_buf(r, data, 16);
sg_init_one(&sg, data, 16);
@@ -110,7 +108,7 @@ static int smp_e(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, const u8 *k, u8 *r)
BT_ERR("Encrypt data error %d", err);
/* Most significant octet of encryptedData corresponds to data[0] */
- swap128(data, r);
+ swap_buf(data, r, 16);
return err;
}
@@ -174,13 +172,16 @@ int smp_generate_rpa(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, u8 irk[16], bdaddr_t *rpa)
return 0;
}
-static int smp_c1(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, u8 k[16], u8 r[16],
- u8 preq[7], u8 pres[7], u8 _iat, bdaddr_t *ia,
- u8 _rat, bdaddr_t *ra, u8 res[16])
+static int smp_c1(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 k[16], u8 r[16], u8 preq[7],
+ u8 pres[7], u8 _iat, bdaddr_t *ia, u8 _rat, bdaddr_t *ra,
+ u8 res[16])
{
+ struct hci_dev *hdev = smp->conn->hcon->hdev;
u8 p1[16], p2[16];
int err;
+ BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
+
memset(p1, 0, 16);
/* p1 = pres || preq || _rat || _iat */
@@ -198,7 +199,7 @@ static int smp_c1(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, u8 k[16], u8 r[16],
u128_xor((u128 *) res, (u128 *) r, (u128 *) p1);
/* res = e(k, res) */
- err = smp_e(tfm, k, res);
+ err = smp_e(smp->tfm_aes, k, res);
if (err) {
BT_ERR("Encrypt data error");
return err;
@@ -208,23 +209,26 @@ static int smp_c1(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, u8 k[16], u8 r[16],
u128_xor((u128 *) res, (u128 *) res, (u128 *) p2);
/* res = e(k, res) */
- err = smp_e(tfm, k, res);
+ err = smp_e(smp->tfm_aes, k, res);
if (err)
BT_ERR("Encrypt data error");
return err;
}
-static int smp_s1(struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm, u8 k[16], u8 r1[16],
- u8 r2[16], u8 _r[16])
+static int smp_s1(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 k[16], u8 r1[16], u8 r2[16],
+ u8 _r[16])
{
+ struct hci_dev *hdev = smp->conn->hcon->hdev;
int err;
+ BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
+
/* Just least significant octets from r1 and r2 are considered */
memcpy(_r, r2, 8);
memcpy(_r + 8, r1, 8);
- err = smp_e(tfm, k, _r);
+ err = smp_e(smp->tfm_aes, k, _r);
if (err)
BT_ERR("Encrypt data error");
@@ -385,6 +389,18 @@ static const u8 gen_method[5][5] = {
{ CFM_PASSKEY, CFM_PASSKEY, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, OVERLAP },
};
+static u8 get_auth_method(struct smp_chan *smp, u8 local_io, u8 remote_io)
+{
+ /* If either side has unknown io_caps, use JUST_CFM (which gets
+ * converted later to JUST_WORKS if we're initiators.
+ */
+ if (local_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY ||
+ remote_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY)
+ return JUST_CFM;
+
+ return gen_method[remote_io][local_io];
+}
+
static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
u8 local_io, u8 remote_io)
{
@@ -400,24 +416,25 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
BT_DBG("tk_request: auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io, remote_io);
- /* If neither side wants MITM, use JUST WORKS */
- /* If either side has unknown io_caps, use JUST WORKS */
- /* Otherwise, look up method from the table */
- if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_MITM) ||
- local_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY ||
- remote_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY)
- method = JUST_WORKS;
+ /* If neither side wants MITM, either "just" confirm an incoming
+ * request or use just-works for outgoing ones. The JUST_CFM
+ * will be converted to JUST_WORKS if necessary later in this
+ * function. If either side has MITM look up the method from the
+ * table.
+ */
+ if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_MITM))
+ method = JUST_CFM;
else
- method = gen_method[remote_io][local_io];
-
- /* If not bonding, don't ask user to confirm a Zero TK */
- if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) && method == JUST_CFM)
- method = JUST_WORKS;
+ method = get_auth_method(smp, local_io, remote_io);
/* Don't confirm locally initiated pairing attempts */
if (method == JUST_CFM && test_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags))
method = JUST_WORKS;
+ /* Don't bother user space with no IO capabilities */
+ if (method == JUST_CFM && hcon->io_capability == HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT)
+ method = JUST_WORKS;
+
/* If Just Works, Continue with Zero TK */
if (method == JUST_WORKS) {
set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags);
@@ -432,7 +449,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
* Confirms and the slave Enters the passkey.
*/
if (method == OVERLAP) {
- if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)
+ if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
method = CFM_PASSKEY;
else
method = REQ_PASSKEY;
@@ -470,23 +487,15 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth,
static u8 smp_confirm(struct smp_chan *smp)
{
struct l2cap_conn *conn = smp->conn;
- struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev;
- struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm = hdev->tfm_aes;
struct smp_cmd_pairing_confirm cp;
int ret;
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
- /* Prevent mutual access to hdev->tfm_aes */
- hci_dev_lock(hdev);
-
- ret = smp_c1(tfm, smp->tk, smp->prnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
+ ret = smp_c1(smp, smp->tk, smp->prnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
conn->hcon->init_addr_type, &conn->hcon->init_addr,
conn->hcon->resp_addr_type, &conn->hcon->resp_addr,
cp.confirm_val);
-
- hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
-
if (ret)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
@@ -501,25 +510,17 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
{
struct l2cap_conn *conn = smp->conn;
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
- struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
- struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm = hdev->tfm_aes;
u8 confirm[16];
int ret;
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tfm))
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(smp->tfm_aes))
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
BT_DBG("conn %p %s", conn, conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
- /* Prevent mutual access to hdev->tfm_aes */
- hci_dev_lock(hdev);
-
- ret = smp_c1(tfm, smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
+ ret = smp_c1(smp, smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->preq, smp->prsp,
hcon->init_addr_type, &hcon->init_addr,
hcon->resp_addr_type, &hcon->resp_addr, confirm);
-
- hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
-
if (ret)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
@@ -533,7 +534,7 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
__le64 rand = 0;
__le16 ediv = 0;
- smp_s1(tfm, smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->prnd, stk);
+ smp_s1(smp, smp->tk, smp->rrnd, smp->prnd, stk);
memset(stk + smp->enc_key_size, 0,
SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE - smp->enc_key_size);
@@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
hci_le_start_enc(hcon, ediv, rand, stk);
hcon->enc_key_size = smp->enc_key_size;
+ set_bit(HCI_CONN_STK_ENCRYPT, &hcon->flags);
} else {
u8 stk[16], auth;
__le64 rand = 0;
@@ -551,7 +553,7 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM, sizeof(smp->prnd),
smp->prnd);
- smp_s1(tfm, smp->tk, smp->prnd, smp->rrnd, stk);
+ smp_s1(smp, smp->tk, smp->prnd, smp->rrnd, stk);
memset(stk + smp->enc_key_size, 0,
SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE - smp->enc_key_size);
@@ -561,9 +563,12 @@ static u8 smp_random(struct smp_chan *smp)
else
auth = 0;
+ /* Even though there's no _SLAVE suffix this is the
+ * slave STK we're adding for later lookup (the master
+ * STK never needs to be stored).
+ */
hci_add_ltk(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
- HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size,
- ediv, rand);
+ SMP_STK, auth, stk, smp->enc_key_size, ediv, rand);
}
return 0;
@@ -577,9 +582,15 @@ static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
if (!smp)
return NULL;
+ smp->tfm_aes = crypto_alloc_blkcipher("ecb(aes)", 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
+ if (IS_ERR(smp->tfm_aes)) {
+ BT_ERR("Unable to create ECB crypto context");
+ kfree(smp);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
smp->conn = conn;
conn->smp_chan = smp;
- conn->hcon->smp_conn = conn;
hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
@@ -599,6 +610,8 @@ void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
kfree(smp->csrk);
kfree(smp->slave_csrk);
+ crypto_free_blkcipher(smp->tfm_aes);
+
/* If pairing failed clean up any keys we might have */
if (!complete) {
if (smp->ltk) {
@@ -619,19 +632,18 @@ void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
kfree(smp);
conn->smp_chan = NULL;
- conn->hcon->smp_conn = NULL;
hci_conn_drop(conn->hcon);
}
int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
{
- struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->smp_conn;
+ struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->l2cap_data;
struct smp_chan *smp;
u32 value;
BT_DBG("");
- if (!conn)
+ if (!conn || !test_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &hcon->flags))
return -ENOTCONN;
smp = conn->smp_chan;
@@ -668,8 +680,9 @@ int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey)
static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct smp_cmd_pairing rsp, *req = (void *) skb->data;
+ struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev;
struct smp_chan *smp;
- u8 key_size, auth;
+ u8 key_size, auth, sec_level;
int ret;
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
@@ -677,7 +690,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (skb->len < sizeof(*req))
return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
- if (conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)
+ if (conn->hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_SLAVE)
return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &conn->hcon->flags))
@@ -688,6 +701,10 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!smp)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
+ if (!test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &hdev->dev_flags) &&
+ (req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
+ return SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;
+
smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
memcpy(&smp->preq[1], req, sizeof(*req));
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*req));
@@ -695,7 +712,19 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
/* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
auth = req->auth_req;
- conn->hcon->pending_sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(auth);
+ sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(auth);
+ if (sec_level > conn->hcon->pending_sec_level)
+ conn->hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level;
+
+ /* If we need MITM check that it can be acheived */
+ if (conn->hcon->pending_sec_level >= BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
+ u8 method;
+
+ method = get_auth_method(smp, conn->hcon->io_capability,
+ req->io_capability);
+ if (method == JUST_WORKS || method == JUST_CFM)
+ return SMP_AUTH_REQUIREMENTS;
+ }
build_pairing_cmd(conn, req, &rsp, auth);
@@ -715,8 +744,6 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (ret)
return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
- clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -732,7 +759,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (skb->len < sizeof(*rsp))
return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
- if (!(conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER))
+ if (conn->hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rsp));
@@ -743,6 +770,16 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size))
return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
+ /* If we need MITM check that it can be acheived */
+ if (conn->hcon->pending_sec_level >= BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
+ u8 method;
+
+ method = get_auth_method(smp, req->io_capability,
+ rsp->io_capability);
+ if (method == JUST_WORKS || method == JUST_CFM)
+ return SMP_AUTH_REQUIREMENTS;
+ }
+
get_random_bytes(smp->prnd, sizeof(smp->prnd));
smp->prsp[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP;
@@ -810,26 +847,51 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
return smp_random(smp);
}
-static u8 smp_ltk_encrypt(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 sec_level)
+static bool smp_ltk_encrypt(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 sec_level)
{
struct smp_ltk *key;
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
key = hci_find_ltk_by_addr(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
- hcon->out);
+ hcon->role);
if (!key)
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (sec_level > BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM && !key->authenticated)
- return 0;
+ return false;
if (test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &hcon->flags))
- return 1;
+ return true;
hci_le_start_enc(hcon, key->ediv, key->rand, key->val);
hcon->enc_key_size = key->enc_size;
- return 1;
+ /* We never store STKs for master role, so clear this flag */
+ clear_bit(HCI_CONN_STK_ENCRYPT, &hcon->flags);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool smp_sufficient_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 sec_level)
+{
+ if (sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW)
+ return true;
+
+ /* If we're encrypted with an STK always claim insufficient
+ * security. This way we allow the connection to be re-encrypted
+ * with an LTK, even if the LTK provides the same level of
+ * security. Only exception is if we don't have an LTK (e.g.
+ * because of key distribution bits).
+ */
+ if (test_bit(HCI_CONN_STK_ENCRYPT, &hcon->flags) &&
+ hci_find_ltk_by_addr(hcon->hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
+ hcon->role))
+ return false;
+
+ if (hcon->sec_level >= sec_level)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -838,16 +900,22 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
struct smp_chan *smp;
+ u8 sec_level;
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
if (skb->len < sizeof(*rp))
return SMP_INVALID_PARAMS;
- if (!(conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER))
+ if (hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
- hcon->pending_sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req);
+ sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req);
+ if (smp_sufficient_security(hcon, sec_level))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (sec_level > hcon->pending_sec_level)
+ hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level;
if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn, hcon->pending_sec_level))
return 0;
@@ -855,7 +923,13 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &hcon->flags))
return 0;
+ if (!test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &hcon->hdev->dev_flags) &&
+ (rp->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
+ return SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;
+
smp = smp_chan_create(conn);
+ if (!smp)
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
@@ -867,22 +941,9 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
- clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
-
return 0;
}
-bool smp_sufficient_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 sec_level)
-{
- if (sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW)
- return true;
-
- if (hcon->sec_level >= sec_level)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
{
struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->l2cap_data;
@@ -901,9 +962,12 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
if (smp_sufficient_security(hcon, sec_level))
return 1;
- if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)
- if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn, sec_level))
- goto done;
+ if (sec_level > hcon->pending_sec_level)
+ hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level;
+
+ if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
+ if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn, hcon->pending_sec_level))
+ return 0;
if (test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &hcon->flags))
return 0;
@@ -918,10 +982,10 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
* requires it.
*/
if (hcon->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT ||
- sec_level > BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM)
+ hcon->pending_sec_level > BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM)
authreq |= SMP_AUTH_MITM;
- if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
+ if (hcon->role == HCI_ROLE_MASTER) {
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq);
@@ -937,9 +1001,6 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 sec_level)
set_bit(SMP_FLAG_INITIATOR, &smp->flags);
-done:
- hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level;
-
return 0;
}
@@ -989,7 +1050,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_master_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
authenticated = (hcon->sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH);
- ltk = hci_add_ltk(hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type, HCI_SMP_LTK,
+ ltk = hci_add_ltk(hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type, SMP_LTK,
authenticated, smp->tk, smp->enc_key_size,
rp->ediv, rp->rand);
smp->ltk = ltk;
@@ -1043,6 +1104,8 @@ static int smp_cmd_ident_addr_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*info));
+ hci_dev_lock(hcon->hdev);
+
/* Strictly speaking the Core Specification (4.1) allows sending
* an empty address which would force us to rely on just the IRK
* as "identity information". However, since such
@@ -1052,8 +1115,7 @@ static int smp_cmd_ident_addr_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
*/
if (!bacmp(&info->bdaddr, BDADDR_ANY)) {
BT_ERR("Ignoring IRK with no identity address");
- smp_distribute_keys(conn);
- return 0;
+ goto distribute;
}
bacpy(&smp->id_addr, &info->bdaddr);
@@ -1067,8 +1129,11 @@ static int smp_cmd_ident_addr_info(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
smp->remote_irk = hci_add_irk(conn->hcon->hdev, &smp->id_addr,
smp->id_addr_type, smp->irk, &rpa);
+distribute:
smp_distribute_keys(conn);
+ hci_dev_unlock(hcon->hdev);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1124,7 +1189,7 @@ int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
if (!test_bit(HCI_LE_ENABLED, &hcon->hdev->dev_flags)) {
- err = -ENOTSUPP;
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
reason = SMP_PAIRING_NOTSUPP;
goto done;
}
@@ -1142,7 +1207,7 @@ int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
!conn->smp_chan) {
BT_ERR("Unexpected SMP command 0x%02x. Disconnecting.", code);
kfree_skb(skb);
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
switch (code) {
@@ -1305,7 +1370,7 @@ int smp_distribute_keys(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
authenticated = hcon->sec_level == BT_SECURITY_HIGH;
ltk = hci_add_ltk(hdev, &hcon->dst, hcon->dst_type,
- HCI_SMP_LTK_SLAVE, authenticated, enc.ltk,
+ SMP_LTK_SLAVE, authenticated, enc.ltk,
smp->enc_key_size, ediv, rand);
smp->slave_ltk = ltk;
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-07-12 11:33:33 +0000