summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-07-30drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.cLucas De Marchi
No need for special CNL handling as there is no real platform with that configuration. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210728215946.1573015-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915: s/intel_crtc/crtc/Ville Syrjälä
Clear out the straggler 'intel_crtc' variables. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210609085632.22026-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2021-04-14drm/i915/display: rename display version macrosLucas De Marchi
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went back on what we did for display: 1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly like is done for >, >=, <=? 2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we could actually repurpose it for a range check With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant. So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER() users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes, this was done by the following semantic patch: @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1 @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1 @@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until) Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> [Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-03-23drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version testsMatt Roper
GLK has always been a bit of a special case since it reports INTEL_GEN() as 9, but has version 10 display IP. Now we can properly represent the display version as 10 and simplify the display generation tests throughout the display code. Aside from manually adding the version to the glk_info structure, the rest of this patch is generated with a Coccinelle semantic patch. Note that we also need to switch any code that matches gen10 today but *not* GLK to be CNL-specific: @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 9 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && E + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && E | - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) | - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) ) @@ expression dev_priv, E, E2; @@ ( - (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E2 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || E2 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) ) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 10 | - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) + E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) | - IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= E) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < E v2: - Convert gen10 conditions that don't include GLK into CNL conditions. (Ville) v3: - Rework coccinelle rules so that "ver>=10" turns into "ver>=11||is_cnl." (Ville) v3.1: - Manually re-add the ".display.version = 10" to glk_info after regenerating patch via Coccinelle. v4: - Also apply cocci rules to intel_pm.c and i915_irq.c! (CI) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210322233840.4056851-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-03-23drm/i915/display: Eliminate most usage of INTEL_GEN()Matt Roper
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN() in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The following semantic patch was used: @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) @@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@ - IS_GEN(dev_priv, E) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; expression from, until; @@ - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c (watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately. v2: - Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani) Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-03-05drm/i915: Fix DSI TE max_vblank_count handlingVille Syrjälä
commit 33267703df15 ("drm/i915/dsi: Enable software vblank counter") claims to get the mode_flags from the crtc_state, but in fact does not. Fix it to do it right. Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210304170421.10901-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2021-03-05drm/i915: Don't try to query the frame counter for disabled pipesVille Syrjälä
For platforms/outputs without hardware frame counters we can't call drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count() when the vblank support is disabled or we just get a WARN due to the crtc timings (vblank->hwmode) being considered invalid. Note that until the pipe in question has been enabled and drm_crtc_set_max_vblank_count() has been called on it we would also take this path on platforms which have a working frame counter. So getting the WARN is rather likely on any platform unless you always boot with lots of displays plugged in. Also even on hardware with a working frame counter we may not be able to read the actual frame counter register on disabled pipes due the relevant power well being disabled. Ie. would just result in the unclaimed reg spew. So let's just avoid all this an directly report zero in case the pipe is disabled. Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210304170421.10901-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
2021-03-05drm/i915: Move pipe enable/disable tracepoints to intel_crtc_vblank_{on,off}()Ville Syrjälä
On platforms/outputs without a working frame counter we rely on the vblank code to cook up the frame counter from the timestamps. That requires that vblank support is enabled. Thus we need to move the pipe enable/disable tracepoints to the other side of the drm_vblank_{on,off}() calls. There shouldn't really be much happening between these old and new call sites so the tracepoints should still provide reasonable data. The alternative would be to give up on having the frame counter values in the trace which would render the tracepoints more or less pointless. v2: Missed one case in intel_ddi_post_disable() Drop the now useless i915_trace.h includes Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210304170421.10901-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
2021-02-18drm/i915: Nuke INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_INVALIDVille Syrjälä
We tend to use output_format!=RGB as a shorthand for YCbCr, but this fails if we have a disabled crtc where output_format==INVALID. We're now getting some fail from intel_color_check() when we have: hw.enable==false hw.ctm!=NULL output_format==INVALID Let's avoid that by throwing INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_INVALID to the dumpster, and thus everything defaults to RGB when the crtc is disabled. This does beg the deeper question of how much of the state should we in fact be validating when hw/uapi.enable==false. And should we even be doing the uapi->hw copy when uapi.enable==false? So far I've not been able to come up with satisfactory answers for myself, so I'm putting it off for the moment. Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Fixes: 0aa5c3835c8a ("drm/i915: support two CSC module on gen11 and later") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2964 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205202322.27608-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
2021-02-08drm/i915: move pipe update code into crtc. (v2)Dave Airlie
Daniel suggested this should move here. v2: move vrr code. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/738c7aaeb63c7d2357ddd932f18787ec8a3cefeb.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-02-08drm/i915: migrate skl planes code new file (v5)Dave Airlie
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher. Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file, there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions later. v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions, add header file. v3: move scaler bits back v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville) v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville) Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> [Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-01-16drm/i915: refactor some crtc code out of intel display. (v2)Dave Airlie
There may be more crtc code that can be pulled out, but this is a good start. v2: move plane before this. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> [Jani: cleaned up intel_crtc.h a bit.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/eacbe964f90d189c5940c12af5e09091b37a19c3.1610622609.git.jani.nikula@intel.com