summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-07-29drm/i915/dg2: Update lane disable power state during PSRGwan-gyeong Mun
The PSR enable/disable sequences now require that we program an extra register in the PHY to adjust the lane disable power setting. Bspec: 49274 Bspec: 53885 Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723174239.1551352-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-26drm/i915/display/psr2: Mark as updated all planes that intersect with pipe_clipJosé Roberto de Souza
Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() that intersect with pipe damaged area will not have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch() called, causing panel to not be properly updated. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-07-23drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2 to the PSR2 defeature listJosé Roberto de Souza
PSR2 is not supported on DG2. Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-21drm/i915: Make display workaround upper bounds exclusiveMatt Roper
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound (i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very easy for mistakes to creep in. Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code. We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make this change too. [mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree] Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-21drm/i915/rkl: Wa_1408330847 no longer applies to RKLMatt Roper
RKL doesn't have PSR2 support, so PSR2-related workarounds no longer apply. Bspec: 53273 Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-7-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-20drm/i915/display/adl_p: Implement PSR changesJosé Roberto de Souza
Implements changes around PSR for alderlake-P: - EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE was removed and bit 30 now has other function - Some bits of PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL moved and SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE was removed setting SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR will do this job - SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR have now line granularity but will need to be aligned with DSC when the PSRS + DSC support lands BSpec: 50422 BSpec: 50424 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-07-14Merge branch 'topic/revid_steppings' into drm-intel-nextMatt Roper
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the new macros is clean. Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2021-07-14drm/i915/rkl: Use revid->stepping tablesMatt Roper
Switch RKL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all platforms going forward. Bspec: 44501 Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-10-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-07-13drm/i915/display: Settle on "adl-x" in WA commentsJosé Roberto de Souza
Most of the places are using this format so lets consolidate it. v2: - split patch in two: display and non-display because of conflicts between drm-intel-gt-next x drm-intel-next Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713003854.143197-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915/display/adl_p: Implement Wa_16011303918José Roberto de Souza
PSR2 is not compatible with DC3CO or VRR in this stepping, so not enabling PSR2 if VRR will be enabled or not enabling DC3CO if PSR2 is possible. BSpec: 54369 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915/xelpd: Handle PSR2 SDP indication in the prior scanlineJosé Roberto de Souza
In some modes there is not enough time during hblank to transmit PSR2 SDP plus the pixels CRC SDP, if such case happens PSR2 needs to be disabled. But eDP spec 1.4b allows to transmit PSR2 SDP in a prior scanline alone and than later the CRC SDP, allowing PSR2 to be enabled in those hblank constrained modes. BSpec: 49274 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-4-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915/display/adl_p: Implement Wa_16011168373José Roberto de Souza
Another WA that is required for PSR2. BSpec: 54369 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-3-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915/display/adl_p: Implement Wa_22012278275José Roberto de Souza
The PSR2_CTL io buffer wake and fast wake values do not match expected in pre production hardware, so here adding a table that matches with HW to program it with values that HW expect. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-24drm/i915/display/psr: Handle SU Y granularityJosé Roberto de Souza
We were only handling X and width granularity, what was causing issues when sink had a granularity different than 4. While at it, renaming su_x_granularity to su_w_granularity to better match reality. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-08drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume functionGwan-gyeong Mun
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-05-26drm/i915/display: Remove a redundant function argument from ↵Gwan-gyeong Mun
intel_psr_enable_source() It removes intel_crtc_state from function argument of intel_psr_enable_source() in order to use intel_psr_enable_source() without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal functions. And we can get cpu_trancoder from intel_psr, therefore we don't need to pass intel_crtc_state to this function. Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210526000656.3060314-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-05-25drm/i915/display/adl_p: Disable PSR2José Roberto de Souza
We are missing the implementation of some workarounds to enabled PSR2 in Alderlake P, so to avoid any CI report of issues around PSR2 disabling it until all PSR2 workarounds are implemented. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-05-25drm/i915/display/adl_p: Allow DC3CO in pipe and port BJosé Roberto de Souza
DC3CO is allowed in all the combinations between pipe and port A and B on alderlake-P. BSpec: 49196 Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-4-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-05-19drm/i915/display: Add PSR interrupt error check functionGwan-gyeong Mun
In order to reuse code of PSR interrupt error check on other PSR functions, it adds psr_interrupt_error_check() function. Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-05-19drm/i915/display: Replace dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr structGwan-gyeong Mun
It replaces dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct. And it saves dc3co_exitline, not dc3co_enabled, so we can use dc3co_exitline without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal function like as intel_psr_enable_source(). Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-12-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-05-19drm/i915/dmc: s/intel_csr/intel_dmcAnusha Srivatsa
No functional change. v2: Chchpatch fixes. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210518213444.11420-2-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com
2021-05-11drm/i915/display: Fill PSR state during hardware configuration read outJosé Roberto de Souza
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed. So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout, EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-05-06drm/i915/display: Disable PSR2 sel fetch in TGL pre-productionJosé Roberto de Souza
The implementation of two workarounds are missing causing failures in CI with pre-production HW. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210505213801.80772-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-05-05drm/i915: Don't include intel_de.h from intel_display_types.hVille Syrjälä
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h. This little cocci script did most of the work for me: @find@ @@ ( intel_de_read(...) | intel_de_read_fw(...) | intel_de_write(...) | intel_de_write_fw(...) ) @has_include@ @@ ( #include "intel_de.h" | #include "display/intel_de.h" ) @depends on find && !has_include@ @@ + #include "intel_de.h" #include "intel_display_types.h" @depends on find && !has_include@ @@ + #include "display/intel_de.h" #include "display/intel_display_types.h" Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2021-04-26drm/i915/display: Disable PSR2 if TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0Gwan-gyeong Mun
TGL PSR2 hardware tracking shows momentary flicker and screen shift if TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0. It has been fixed from TGL Display stepping C0. HSDES: 18015970021 HSDES: 2209313811 BSpec: 55378 v2: Add checking of PSR2 manual tracking (Jose) Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210422160544.2427123-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-04-23drm/i915/display/xelpd: Do not program EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLEJosé Roberto de Souza
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE became a reserved register in display 13. EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID have the same fate as EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE but as we don't need it, removing the macro definition of it. BSpec: 50422 Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421220224.200729-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-04-19Merge tag 'topic/intel-gen-to-ver-2021-04-19' of ↵Rodrigo Vivi
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-intel-next Gen to ver conversions across the driver The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville's GLK fixes [2] and a cherry-pick of Matt's commit [3] from drm-intel-next as a base to avoid conflicts. [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/ [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88938/ [3] 70bfb30743d5 ("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}") Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> # Conflicts: # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/878s5ebny0.fsf@intel.com
2021-04-14drm/i915/display/psr: Fix cppcheck warningsJosé Roberto de Souza
Fix redundant condition, caught in cppcheck by kernel test robot. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Fixes: b64d6c51380b ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances") Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210409231738.238682-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-04-14drm/i915/display: rename display version macrosLucas De Marchi
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went back on what we did for display: 1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly like is done for >, >=, <=? 2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we could actually repurpose it for a range check With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant. So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER() users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes, this was done by the following semantic patch: @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1 @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1 @@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until) Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> [Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-04-12Revert "drm/i915/tgl/psr: Fix glitches when doing frontbuffer modifications"José Roberto de Souza
This reverts commit 71c1a4998320962f7b8362b2c5ee36610d49e8fb. The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and get back some power savings. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408204917.254272-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-04-09drm/i915/display: Defeature PSR2 for RKL and ADL-SJosé Roberto de Souza
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking. HSDES: 14011750631 HSDES: 14011741325 BSpec: 53273 Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408214205.327704-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-04-02drm/i915/display/psr: Disable DC3CO when the PSR2 is usedGwan-gyeong Mun
Due to the changed sequence of activating/deactivating DC3CO, disable DC3CO until the changed dc3co activating/deactivating sequence is applied. References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3134 Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210401170237.40472-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-03-29drm/i915: rename DISP_STEPPING->DISPLAY_STEP and GT_STEPPING->GT_STEPJani Nikula
Matter of taste. STEP matches the enums. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/cf2dccd1c9c7fdcf5de08ea10a9265292b45d8c7.1616764798.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-03-23drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version testsMatt Roper
GLK has always been a bit of a special case since it reports INTEL_GEN() as 9, but has version 10 display IP. Now we can properly represent the display version as 10 and simplify the display generation tests throughout the display code. Aside from manually adding the version to the glk_info structure, the rest of this patch is generated with a Coccinelle semantic patch. Note that we also need to switch any code that matches gen10 today but *not* GLK to be CNL-specific: @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 9 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && E + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && E | - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) | - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) ) @@ expression dev_priv, E, E2; @@ ( - (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E2 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || E2 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) ) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 10 | - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) + E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) | - IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= E) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < E v2: - Convert gen10 conditions that don't include GLK into CNL conditions. (Ville) v3: - Rework coccinelle rules so that "ver>=10" turns into "ver>=11||is_cnl." (Ville) v3.1: - Manually re-add the ".display.version = 10" to glk_info after regenerating patch via Coccinelle. v4: - Also apply cocci rules to intel_pm.c and i915_irq.c! (CI) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210322233840.4056851-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-03-23drm/i915/display: Eliminate most usage of INTEL_GEN()Matt Roper
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN() in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The following semantic patch was used: @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) @@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@ - IS_GEN(dev_priv, E) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; expression from, until; @@ - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c (watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately. v2: - Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani) Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-02-23drm/i915/display: Do not allow DC3CO if PSR SF is enabledGwan-gyeong Mun
Even though GEN12+ HW supports PSR + DC3CO, DMC's HW DC3CO exit mechanism has an issue with using of Selective Fecth and PSR2 manual tracking. And as some GEN12+ platforms (RKL, ADL-S) don't support PSR2 HW tracking, Selective Fetch will be enabled by default on that platforms. Therefore if the system enables PSR Selective Fetch / PSR manual tracking, it does not allow DC3CO dc state, in that case. When this DC3CO exit issue is addressed while PSR Selective Fetch is enabled, this restriction should be removed. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Fix typo - Move check routine of DC3CO ability to tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config() v3: Change the check routine of enablement of psr2 sel fetch. (Jose) Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222213006.1609085-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-22drm/i915/display: Set source_support even if panel do not support PSRJosé Roberto de Souza
This will set the right value of source_support when the port encoder/port supports PSR but sink don't. This change will also be needed in future for panel replay as psr struct needs to be initialized even if disconnected or current sink don't support PSR. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-4-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-22drm/i915/display: Remove some redundancy around CAN_PSR()José Roberto de Souza
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check it again at every CAN_PSR(). Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-22drm/i915/display: Only write to register in ↵José Roberto de Souza
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder. Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL. So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch(). Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-22drm/i915/display: Rename for_each_intel_encoder.*_can_psr to ↵José Roberto de Souza
for_each_intel_encoder.*_with_psr for_each_intel_encoder.*_"can_psr" sounds strange, in my opinion "with_psr" is better. Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-22drm/i915/display: Allow PSR2 selective fetch to be enabled at run-timeJosé Roberto de Souza
Right now CI is blacklisting module reload, so we need to be able to enable PSR2 selective fetch in run time to test this feature before enable it by default. Changes in IGT will also be needed. v2: - Fixed handling of I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH in intel_psr_debug_set() Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209205036.351076-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-08drm/i915: migrate skl planes code new file (v5)Dave Airlie
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher. Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file, there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions later. v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions, add header file. v3: move scaler bits back v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville) v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville) Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> [Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-02-05drm/i915/display: Remove PSR2 on JSL and EHLEdmund Dea
While JSL and EHL eDP transcoder supports PSR2, the phy of this platforms only supports eDP 1.3, so removing PSR2 support as this feature was added in eDP 1.4. Signed-off-by: Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204175830.97857-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-02-05drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple InstancesGwan-gyeong Mun
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-02Merge tag 'topic/adl-s-enabling-2021-02-01-1' of ↵Jani Nikula
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-intel-next Driver Changes: - Add basic support for Alder Lake S, to be shared between drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> # Conflicts: # drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210202025620.2212559-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-01-25drm/i915/display/dp: Do not enable PSR if VRR is enabledManasi Navare
Even though our HW supports PSR + VRR, the available panels do not work reliably with PSR and VRR together. So if user requested VRR and is supported by HW enable that and do not enable PSR in that case. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-7-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
2021-01-21drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.cJani Nikula
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a surprisingly clean cut. v2: - Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman) - Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-01-20drm/i915/tgl: Use TGL stepping info for applying WAsAditya Swarup
TGL adds another level of indirection for applying WA based on stepping information rather than PCI REVID. So change TGL_REVID enum into stepping enum and use PCI REVID as index into revid to stepping table to fetch correct display and GT stepping for application of WAs as suggested by Matt Roper. Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-01-19drm/dp: Revert "drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks"Lyude Paul
This reverts commit 0883ce8146ed6074c76399f4e70dbed788582e12. Originally these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs. At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which means we finally have a real solution to this problem. As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only driver using this. v3: * Rebase v2: * Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in intel_edp_init_connector() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
2021-01-05drm/i915/display/psr: Program plane's calculated offset to plane SF registerJosé Roberto de Souza
It programs Plane's calculated x, y, offset to Plane SF register. It does the calculation of x and y offsets using skl_calc_main_surface_offset(). v3: Update commit message Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-4-jose.souza@intel.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.46.0) at 2025-08-02 15:13:38 +0000