summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-03-08btrfs: fix block group item corruption after inserting new block groupFilipe Manana
We can often end up inserting a block group item, for a new block group, with a wrong value for the used bytes field. This happens if for the new allocated block group, in the same transaction that created the block group, we have tasks allocating extents from it as well as tasks removing extents from it. For example: 1) Task A creates a metadata block group X; 2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0; 3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with a value of 32K. But that fails since the block group item was not yet inserted, and so on failure update_block_group_item() sets the "commit_used" field of the block group back to 0; 4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a "used" field having a value of 32K, but without updating the "commit_used" field in the block group, which remains with value of 0; 5) The two extents are freed from block X, so its "used" field changes from 32K to 0; 6) The transaction commit by task B continues, it enters btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups() which calls update_block_group_item() for block group X, and there it decides to skip the block group item update, because "used" has a value of 0 and "commit_used" has a value of 0 too. As a result, we end up with a block item having a 32K "used" field but no extents allocated from it. When this issue happens, a btrfs check reports an error like this: [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0 ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation (...) Fix this by making insert_block_group_item() update the block group's "commit_used" field. Fixes: 7248e0cebbef ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-06btrfs: fix percent calculation for bg reclaim messageJohannes Thumshirn
We have a report, that the info message for block-group reclaim is crossing the 100% used mark. This is happening as we were truncating the divisor for the division (the block_group->length) to a 32bit value. Fix this by using div64_u64() to not truncate the divisor. In the worst case, it can lead to a div by zero error and should be possible to trigger on 4 disks RAID0, and each device is large enough: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/test/scratch[1234] -m raid1 -d raid0 btrfs-progs v6.1 [...] Filesystem size: 40.00GiB Block group profiles: Data: RAID0 4.00GiB <<< Metadata: RAID1 256.00MiB System: RAID1 8.00MiB Reported-by: Forza <forza@tnonline.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e99483.c11a58d.1863591ca52@tnonline.net/ Fixes: 5f93e776c673 ("btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add Qu's note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-06btrfs: fix potential dead lock in size class loading logicBoris Burkov
As reported by Filipe, there's a potential deadlock caused by using btrfs_search_forward on commit_root. The locking there is unconditional, even if ->skip_locking and ->search_commit_root is set. It's not meant to be used for commit roots, so it always needs to do locking. So if another task is COWing a child node of the same root node and then needs to wait for block group caching to complete when trying to allocate a metadata extent, it deadlocks. For example: [539604.239315] sysrq: Show Blocked State [539604.240133] task:kworker/u16:6 state:D stack:0 pid:2119594 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 [539604.241613] Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [539604.242673] Call Trace: [539604.243129] <TASK> [539604.243925] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.244797] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.245399] ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490 [539604.246111] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.246593] rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490 [539604.247290] ? rcu_barrier_tasks_trace+0x10/0x20 [539604.248090] __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150 [539604.248702] down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140 [539604.249280] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs] [539604.250097] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs] [539604.250915] btrfs_search_forward+0x59/0x460 [btrfs] [539604.251781] ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [539604.252476] caching_thread+0x1be/0x920 [btrfs] [539604.253167] btrfs_work_helper+0xf6/0x400 [btrfs] [539604.253848] process_one_work+0x24f/0x5a0 [539604.254476] worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0 [539604.255166] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [539604.256047] kthread+0xf0/0x120 [539604.256591] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [539604.257212] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [539604.257822] </TASK> [539604.258233] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack:0 pid:2236474 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 [539604.259802] Call Trace: [539604.260243] <TASK> [539604.260615] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.261205] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.262000] ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490 [539604.262822] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.263374] rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490 [539604.266228] ? lock_acquire+0x160/0x310 [539604.266917] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.267996] ? lock_contended+0x19e/0x500 [539604.268720] __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150 [539604.269400] down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140 [539604.270057] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs] [539604.271129] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs] [539604.272372] btrfs_search_slot+0x143/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.273295] update_block_group_item+0x9e/0x190 [btrfs] [539604.274282] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1c4/0x4f0 [btrfs] [539604.275381] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x280 [539604.276390] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xee/0xed0 [btrfs] [539604.277391] ? lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x310 [539604.278080] ? start_transaction+0xcb/0x6c0 [btrfs] [539604.279099] transaction_kthread+0x142/0x1c0 [btrfs] [539604.279996] ? __pfx_transaction_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [539604.280673] kthread+0xf0/0x120 [539604.281050] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [539604.281496] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [539604.281966] </TASK> [539604.282255] task:fsstress state:D stack:0 pid:2236483 ppid:1 flags:0x00004006 [539604.283897] Call Trace: [539604.284700] <TASK> [539604.285088] __schedule+0x41d/0xee0 [539604.285660] schedule+0x5d/0xf0 [539604.286175] btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress+0xf2/0x170 [btrfs] [539604.287342] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [539604.288450] find_free_extent+0xd93/0x1750 [btrfs] [539604.289256] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.289911] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs] [539604.290843] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs] [539604.291943] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs] [539604.292903] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs] [539604.293773] btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs] [539604.294595] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.295585] btrfs_update_device+0x71/0x1b0 [btrfs] [539604.296459] btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0xe0/0x340 [btrfs] [539604.297489] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x1bf/0x490 [btrfs] [539604.298335] find_free_extent+0x6fa/0x1750 [btrfs] [539604.299174] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.299950] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs] [539604.300918] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs] [539604.301797] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs] [539604.303017] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.303855] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs] [539604.304789] btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs] [539604.305611] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs] [539604.306682] ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [539604.308198] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x17b/0x7a0 [btrfs] [539604.309254] lookup_extent_backref+0x43/0xd0 [btrfs] [539604.310122] __btrfs_free_extent+0xf8/0x810 [btrfs] [539604.310874] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.311724] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x17b/0x1d0 [btrfs] [539604.313023] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2ba/0x1260 [btrfs] [539604.314271] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x8f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [539604.315445] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.316706] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa2/0xed0 [btrfs] [539604.317855] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [539604.318544] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [539604.319240] create_subvol+0x53d/0x6e0 [btrfs] [539604.320283] btrfs_mksubvol+0x4f5/0x590 [btrfs] [539604.321220] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x11b/0x180 [btrfs] [539604.322307] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc6/0x150 [btrfs] [539604.323295] btrfs_ioctl+0x9f7/0x33e0 [btrfs] [539604.324331] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 [539604.325137] ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 [539604.325808] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [539604.326467] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [539604.327109] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [539604.327875] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [539604.328792] RIP: 0033:0x7f05a7babaeb This needs to use regular btrfs_search_slot() with some skip and stop logic. Since we only consider five samples (five search slots), don't bother with the complexity of looking for commit_root_sem contention. If necessary, it can be added to the load function in between samples. Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7eKMD44Z1+=Kb-1RFMMeZpAm2fwyO59yeBwCcSOU80Pg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: c7eec3d9aa95 ("btrfs: load block group size class when caching") Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-15btrfs: remove the bdev argument to btrfs_rmap_blockChristoph Hellwig
The only user in the zoned remap code is gone now, so remove the argument. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: don't use size classes for zoned file systemsBoris Burkov
When a file system has ZNS devices which are constrained by a maximum number of active block groups, then not being able to use all the block groups for every allocation is not ideal, and could cause us to loop a ton with mixed size allocations. In general, since zoned doesn't write into gaps behind where block groups are writing, it is not susceptible to the same sort of fragmentation that size classes are designed to solve, so we can skip size classes for zoned file systems in general, even though there would probably be no harm for SMR devices. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: load block group size class when cachingBoris Burkov
Since the size class is an artifact of an arbitrary anti fragmentation strategy, it doesn't really make sense to persist it. Furthermore, most of the size class logic assumes fresh block groups. That is of course not a reasonable assumption -- we will be upgrading kernels with existing filesystems whose block groups are not classified. To work around those issues, implement logic to compute the size class of the block groups as we cache them in. To perfectly assess the state of a block group, we would have to read the entire extent tree (since the free space cache mashes together contiguous extent items) which would be prohibitively expensive for larger file systems with more extents. We can do it relatively cheaply by implementing a simple heuristic of sampling a handful of extents and picking the smallest one we see. In the happy case where the block group was classified, we will only see extents of the correct size. In the unhappy case, we will hopefully find one of the smaller extents, but there is no perfect answer anyway. Autorelocation will eventually churn up the block group if there is significant freeing anyway. There was no regression in mount performance at end state of the fsperf test suite, and the delay until the block group is marked cached is minimized by the constant number of extent samples. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: introduce size class to block group allocatorBoris Burkov
The aim of this patch is to reduce the fragmentation of block groups under certain unhappy workloads. It is particularly effective when the size of extents correlates with their lifetime, which is something we have observed causing fragmentation in the fleet at Meta. This patch categorizes extents into size classes: - x < 128KiB: "small" - 128KiB < x < 8MiB: "medium" - x > 8MiB: "large" and as much as possible reduces allocations of extents into block groups that don't match the size class. This takes advantage of any (possible) correlation between size and lifetime and also leaves behind predictable re-usable gaps when extents are freed; small writes don't gum up bigger holes. Size classes are implemented in the following way: - Mark each new block group with a size class of the first allocation that goes into it. - Add two new passes to ffe: "unset size class" and "wrong size class". First, try only matching block groups, then try unset ones, then allow allocation of new ones, and finally allow mismatched block groups. - Filtering is done just by skipping inappropriate ones, there is no special size class indexing. Other solutions I considered were: - A best fit allocator with an rb-tree. This worked well, as small writes didn't leak big holes from large freed extents, but led to regressions in ffe and write performance due to lock contention on the rb-tree with every allocation possibly updating it in parallel. Perhaps something clever could be done to do the updates in the background while being "right enough". - A fixed size "working set". This prevents freeing an extent drastically changing where writes currently land, and seems like a good option too. Doesn't take advantage of size in any way. - The same size class idea, but implemented with xarray marks. This turned out to be slower than looping the linked list and skipping wrong block groups, and is also less flexible since we must have only 3 size classes (max #marks). With the current approach we can have as many as we like. Performance testing was done via: https://github.com/josefbacik/fsperf Of particular relevance are the new fragmentation specific tests. A brief summary of the testing results: - Neutral results on existing tests. There are some minor regressions and improvements here and there, but nothing that truly stands out as notable. - Improvement on new tests where size class and extent lifetime are correlated. Fragmentation in these cases is completely eliminated and write performance is generally a little better. There is also significant improvement where extent sizes are just a bit larger than the size class boundaries. - Regression on one new tests: where the allocations are sized intentionally a hair under the borders of the size classes. Results are neutral on the test that intentionally attacks this new scheme by mixing extent size and lifetime. The full dump of the performance results can be found here: https://bur.io/fsperf/size-class-2022-11-15.txt (there are ANSI escape codes, so best to curl and view in terminal) Here is a snippet from the full results for a new test which mixes buffered writes appending to a long lived set of files and large short lived fallocates: bufferedappendvsfallocate results metric baseline current stdev diff ====================================================================================== avg_commit_ms 31.13 29.20 2.67 -6.22% bg_count 14 15.60 0 11.43% commits 11.10 12.20 0.32 9.91% elapsed 27.30 26.40 2.98 -3.30% end_state_mount_ns 11122551.90 10635118.90 851143.04 -4.38% end_state_umount_ns 1.36e+09 1.35e+09 12248056.65 -1.07% find_free_extent_calls 116244.30 114354.30 964.56 -1.63% find_free_extent_ns_max 599507.20 1047168.20 103337.08 74.67% find_free_extent_ns_mean 3607.19 3672.11 101.20 1.80% find_free_extent_ns_min 500 512 6.67 2.40% find_free_extent_ns_p50 2848 2876 37.65 0.98% find_free_extent_ns_p95 4916 5000 75.45 1.71% find_free_extent_ns_p99 20734.49 20920.48 1670.93 0.90% frag_pct_max 61.67 0 8.05 -100.00% frag_pct_mean 43.59 0 6.10 -100.00% frag_pct_min 25.91 0 16.60 -100.00% frag_pct_p50 42.53 0 7.25 -100.00% frag_pct_p95 61.67 0 8.05 -100.00% frag_pct_p99 61.67 0 8.05 -100.00% fragmented_bg_count 6.10 0 1.45 -100.00% max_commit_ms 49.80 46 5.37 -7.63% sys_cpu 2.59 2.62 0.29 1.39% write_bw_bytes 1.62e+08 1.68e+08 17975843.50 3.23% write_clat_ns_mean 57426.39 54475.95 2292.72 -5.14% write_clat_ns_p50 46950.40 42905.60 2101.35 -8.62% write_clat_ns_p99 148070.40 143769.60 2115.17 -2.90% write_io_kbytes 4194304 4194304 0 0.00% write_iops 2476.15 2556.10 274.29 3.23% write_lat_ns_max 2101667.60 2251129.50 370556.59 7.11% write_lat_ns_mean 59374.91 55682.00 2523.09 -6.22% write_lat_ns_min 17353.10 16250 1646.08 -6.36% There are some mixed improvements/regressions in most metrics along with an elimination of fragmentation in this workload. On the balance, the drastic 1->0 improvement in the happy cases seems worth the mix of regressions and improvements we do observe. Some considerations for future work: - Experimenting with more size classes - More hinting/search ordering work to approximate a best-fit allocator Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning in btrfs_update_block_groupJosef Bacik
reclaim isn't set in the alloc case, however we only care about reclaim in the !alloc case. This isn't an actual problem, however -Wmaybe-uninitialized will complain, so initialize reclaim to quiet the compiler. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::needs_free_space to runtime flagDavid Sterba
We already have flags in block group to track various status bits, convert needs_free_space as well and reduce size of btrfs_block_group. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: simplify percent calculation helpers, rename div_factorDavid Sterba
The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculations and there are two helpers. There's a helper mult_frac that's for general fractions, that tries to be accurate but we multiply and divide by small numbers so we can use the div_u64 helper. Rename the div_factor* helpers and use 1..100 percentage range, also drop the case checking for percentage == 100, it's never hit. The conversions: * div_factor calculates tenths and the numbers need to be adjusted * div_factor_fine is direct replacement Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: update function commentsDavid Sterba
Update, reformat or reword function comments. This also removes the kdoc marker so we don't get reports when the function name is missing. Changes made: - remove kdoc markers - reformat the brief description to be a proper sentence - reword to imperative voice - align parameter list - fix typos Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move extent-tree helpers into their own header fileJosef Bacik
Move all the extent tree related prototypes to extent-tree.h out of ctree.h, and then go include it everywhere needed so everything compiles. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.hJosef Bacik
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so everything compiles. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments, style fixups ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move fs wide helpers out of ctree.hJosef Bacik
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h. The bulk of these are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as btrfs_fs_closing() and the read only helpers that also aren't directly related to the ctree code. Move these into a fs.h header, which will serve as the location for file system wide related helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the sameQu Wenruo
[BACKGROUND] When committing a transaction, we will update block group items for all dirty block groups. But in fact, dirty block groups don't always need to update their block group items. It's pretty common to have a metadata block group which experienced several COW operations, but still have the same amount of used bytes. In that case, we may unnecessarily COW a tree block doing nothing. [ENHANCEMENT] This patch will introduce btrfs_block_group::commit_used member to remember the last used bytes, and use that new member to skip unnecessary block group item update. This would be more common for large filesystems, where metadata block group can be as large as 1GiB, containing at most 64K metadata items. In that case, if COW added and then deleted one metadata item near the end of the block group, then it's completely possible we don't need to touch the block group item at all. [BENCHMARK] The change itself can have quite a high chance (20~80%) to skip block group item updates in lot of workloads. As a result, it would result shorter time spent on btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), and overall reduce the execution time of the critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction(). Here comes a fio command, which will do random writes in 4K block size, causing a very heavy metadata updates. fio --filename=$mnt/file --size=512M --rw=randwrite --direct=1 --bs=4k \ --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=64 --runtime=300 --numjobs=4 \ --name=random_write --fallocate=none --time_based --fsync_on_close=1 The file size (512M) and number of threads (4) means 2GiB file size in total, but during the full 300s run time, my dedicated SATA SSD is able to write around 20~25GiB, which is over 10 times the file size. Thus after we fill the initial 2G, we should not cause much block group item updates. Please note, the fio numbers by themselves don't have much change, but if we look deeper, there is some reduced execution time, especially for the critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction(). I added extra trace_printk() to measure the following per-transaction execution time: - Critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction() By re-using the existing update_commit_stats() function, which has already calculated the interval correctly. - The while() loop for btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups() Although this includes the execution time of btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), it should still be representative overall. Both result involves transid 7~30, the same amount of transaction committed. The result looks like this: | Before | After | Diff ----------------------+-------------------+----------------+-------- Transaction interval | 229247198.5 | 215016933.6 | -6.2% Block group interval | 23133.33333 | 18970.83333 | -18.0% The change in block group item updates is more obvious, as skipped block group item updates also mean less delayed refs. And the overall execution time for that block group update loop is pretty small, thus we can assume the extent tree is already mostly cached. If we can skip an uncached tree block, it would cause more obvious change. Unfortunately the overall reduction in commit transaction critical section is much smaller, as the block group item updates loop is not really the major part, at least not for the above fio script. But still we have a observable reduction in the critical section. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: re-check reclaim condition in reclaim workerBoris Burkov
I have observed the following case play out and lead to unnecessary relocations: 1. write a file across multiple block groups 2. delete the file 3. several block groups fall below the reclaim threshold 4. reclaim the first, moving extents into the others 5. reclaim the others which are now actually very full, leading to poor reclaim behavior with lots of writing, allocating new block groups, etc. I believe the risk of missing some reasonable reclaims is worth it when traded off against the savings of avoiding overfull reclaims. Going forward, it could be interesting to make the check more advanced (zoned aware, fragmentation aware, etc...) so that it can be a really strong signal both at extent delete and reclaim time. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: skip reclaim if block_group is emptyBoris Burkov
As we delete extents from a block group, at some deletion we cross below the reclaim threshold. It is possible we are still in the middle of deleting more extents and might soon hit 0. If the block group is empty by the time the reclaim worker runs, we will still relocate it. This works just fine, as relocating an empty block group ultimately results in properly deleting it. However, we have more direct ways of removing empty block groups in the cleaner thread. Those are either async discard or the unused_bgs list. In fact, when we decide whether to relocate a block group during extent deletion, we do check for emptiness and prefer the discard/unused_bgs mechanisms when possible. Not using relocation for this case reduces some modest overhead from empty bg relocation: - extra transactions - extra metadata use/churn for creating relocation metadata - trying to read the extent tree to look for extents (and in this case finding none) Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move btrfs_should_fragment_free_space into block-group.cJosef Bacik
This function uses functions that are not defined in block-group.h, move it into block-group.c in order to keep the header clean. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-10-11btrfs: delete stale comments after merge conflict resolutionDavid Sterba
There are two comments in btrfs_cache_block_group that I left when resolving conflict between commits ced8ecf026fd8 "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocations" and 527c490f44f6f "btrfs: delete btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished". The former reworked the caching logic to wait until the caching ends in btrfs_cache_block_group while the latter only open coded the waiting. Both removed btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished, the correct code is with the waiting and returning error. Thus the conflict resolution was OK. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-29btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservationsJosef Bacik
In order to accommodate NOWAIT IOCB's we need to be able to do NO_FLUSH data reservations, so plumb this through the delalloc reservation system. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: move btrfs_full_stripe_locks_tree into block-group.hJosef Bacik
This is actually embedded in struct btrfs_block_group, so move this definition to block-group.h, and then open-code the init of the tree where we init the rest of the block group instead of using a helper. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handlingQu Wenruo
Currently there are two corner cases not handling compat RO flags correctly: - Remount We can still mount the fs RO with compat RO flags, then remount it RW. We should not allow any write into a fs with unsupported RO flags. - Still try to search block group items In fact, behavior/on-disk format change to extent tree should not need a full incompat flag. And since we can ensure fs with unsupported RO flags never got any writes (with above case fixed), then we can even skip block group items search at mount time. This patch will enhance the unsupported RO compat flags by: - Reject read-write remount if there are unsupported RO compat flags - Go dummy block group items directly for unsupported RO compat flags In fact, only changes to chunk/subvolume/root/csum trees should go incompat flags. The latter part should allow future change to extent tree to be compat RO flags. Thus this patch also needs to be backported to all stable trees. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: remove use btrfs_remove_free_space_cache instead of variantJosef Bacik
We are calling __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache everywhere to cleanup the block group free space, however we can just use btrfs_remove_free_space_cache and pass in the block group in all of these places. Then we can remove __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache and rename __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked to __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logicOmar Sandoval
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer necessary. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: delete btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finishedJosef Bacik
We used to use this in a few spots, but now we only use it directly inside of block-group.c, so remove the helper and just open code where we were using it. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: remove BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_HAS_CACHING_CTLJosef Bacik
This is used mostly to determine if we need to look at the caching ctl list and clean up any references to this block group. However we never clear this flag, specifically because we need to know if we have to remove a caching ctl we have for this block group still. This is in the remove block group path which isn't a fast path, so the optimization doesn't really matter, simplify this logic and remove the flag. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: simplify block group traversal in btrfs_put_block_group_cacheJosef Bacik
We're breaking out and re-searching for the next block group while evicting any of the block group cache inodes. This is not needed, the block groups aren't disappearing here, we can simply loop through the block groups like normal and iput any inode that we find. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: convert block group bit field to use bit helpersJosef Bacik
We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few of these flags. Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can utilize the bit helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: handle space_info setting of bg in btrfs_add_bg_to_space_infoJosef Bacik
We previously had the pattern of btrfs_update_space_info(all, the, bg, fields, &space_info); link_block_group(bg); bg->space_info = space_info; Now that we're passing the bg into btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info we can do the linking in that function, transforming this to simply btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(fs_info, bg); and put the link_block_group() and bg->space_info assignment directly in btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: simplify arguments of btrfs_update_space_info and renameJosef Bacik
This function has grown a bunch of new arguments, and it just boils down to passing in all the block group fields as arguments. Simplify this by passing in the block group itself and updating the space_info fields based on the block group fields directly. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: use btrfs_fs_closing for background bg workJosef Bacik
For both unused bg deletion and async balance work we'll happily run if the fs is closing. However I want to move these to their own worker thread, and they can be long running jobs, so add a check to see if we're closing and simply bail. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-23btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocationsOmar Sandoval
When testing space_cache v2 on a large set of machines, we encountered a few symptoms: 1. "unable to add free space :-17" (EEXIST) errors. 2. Missing free space info items, sometimes caught with a "missing free space info for X" error. 3. Double-accounted space: ranges that were allocated in the extent tree and also marked as free in the free space tree, ranges that were marked as allocated twice in the extent tree, or ranges that were marked as free twice in the free space tree. If the latter made it onto disk, the next reboot would hit the BUG_ON() in add_new_free_space(). 4. On some hosts with no on-disk corruption or error messages, the in-memory space cache (dumped with drgn) disagreed with the free space tree. All of these symptoms have the same underlying cause: a race between caching the free space for a block group and returning free space to the in-memory space cache for pinned extents causes us to double-add a free range to the space cache. This race exists when free space is cached from the free space tree (space_cache=v2) or the extent tree (nospace_cache, or space_cache=v1 if the cache needs to be regenerated). struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin and struct btrfs_block_group::progress are supposed to protect against this race, but commit d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") subtly broke this by allowing multiple transactions to be unpinning extents at the same time. Specifically, the race is as follows: 1. An extent is deleted from an uncached block group in transaction A. 2. btrfs_commit_transaction() is called for transaction A. 3. btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> __btrfs_free_extent() runs the delayed ref for the deleted extent. 4. __btrfs_free_extent() -> do_free_extent_accounting() -> add_to_free_space_tree() adds the deleted extent back to the free space tree. 5. do_free_extent_accounting() -> btrfs_update_block_group() -> btrfs_cache_block_group() queues up the block group to get cached. block_group->progress is set to block_group->start. 6. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls switch_commit_roots(). It sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to block_group->progress, which is block_group->start because the block group hasn't been cached yet. 7. The caching thread gets to our block group. Since the commit roots were already switched, load_free_space_tree() sees the deleted extent as free and adds it to the space cache. It finishes caching and sets block_group->progress to U64_MAX. 8. btrfs_commit_transaction() advances transaction A to TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED. 9. fsync calls btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B. Since transaction A is already in TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED and the commit is for fsync, it advances. 10. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction B calls switch_commit_roots(). This time, the block group has already been cached, so it sets block_group->last_byte_to_unpin to U64_MAX. 11. btrfs_commit_transaction() for transaction A calls btrfs_finish_extent_commit(), which calls unpin_extent_range() for the deleted extent. It sees last_byte_to_unpin set to U64_MAX (by transaction B!), so it adds the deleted extent to the space cache again! This explains all of our symptoms above: * If the sequence of events is exactly as described above, when the free space is re-added in step 11, it will fail with EEXIST. * If another thread reallocates the deleted extent in between steps 7 and 11, then step 11 will silently re-add that space to the space cache as free even though it is actually allocated. Then, if that space is allocated *again*, the free space tree will be corrupted (namely, the wrong item will be deleted). * If we don't catch this free space tree corruption, it will continue to get worse as extents are deleted and reallocated. The v1 space_cache is synchronously loaded when an extent is deleted (btrfs_update_block_group() with alloc=0 calls btrfs_cache_block_group() with load_cache_only=1), so it is not normally affected by this bug. However, as noted above, if we fail to load the space cache, we will fall back to caching from the extent tree and may hit this bug. The easiest fix for this race is to also make caching from the free space tree or extent tree synchronous. Josef tested this and found no performance regressions. A few extra changes fall out of this change. Namely, this fix does the following, with step 2 being the crucial fix: 1. Factor btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done() out of btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to allow waiting on a caching_ctl that we already hold a reference to. 2. Change the call in btrfs_cache_block_group() of btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() to btrfs_caching_ctl_wait_done(), which makes us wait regardless of the space_cache option. 3. Delete the now unused btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished() and space_cache_v1_done(). 4. Change btrfs_cache_block_group()'s `int load_cache_only` parameter to `bool wait` to more accurately describe its new meaning. 5. Change a few callers which had a separate call to btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() to use wait = true instead. 6. Make btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done() static now that it's not used outside of block-group.c anymore. Fixes: d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-27btrfs: reset RO counter on block group if we fail to relocateJosef Bacik
With the automatic block group reclaim code we will preemptively try to mark the block group RO before we start the relocation. We do this to make sure we should actually try to relocate the block group. However if we hit an error during the actual relocation we won't clean up our RO counter and the block group will remain RO. This was observed internally with file systems reporting less space available from df when we had failed background relocations. Fix this by doing the dec_ro in the error case. Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: zoned: activate necessary block groupNaohiro Aota
There are two places where allocating a chunk is not enough. These two places are trying to ensure the space by allocating a chunk. To meet the condition for active_total_bytes, we also need to activate a block group there. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Fixes: afba2bc036b0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking") Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytesNaohiro Aota
The active_total_bytes, like the total_bytes, accounts for the total bytes of active block groups in the space_info. With an introduction of active_total_bytes, we can check if the reserved bytes can be written to the block groups without activating a new block group. The check is necessary for metadata allocation on zoned filesystem. We cannot finish a block group, which may require waiting for the current transaction, from the metadata allocation context. Instead, we need to ensure the ongoing allocation (reserved bytes) fits in active block groups. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: merge calculations for simple striped profiles in btrfs_rmap_blockDavid Sterba
Use the same expression for stripe_nr for RAID0 (map->sub_stripes is 1) and RAID10 (map->sub_stripes is 2), with equivalent results. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: reset block group chunk force if we have to waitJosef Bacik
If you try to force a chunk allocation, but you race with another chunk allocation, you will end up waiting on the chunk allocation that just occurred and then allocate another chunk. If you have many threads all doing this at once you can way over-allocate chunks. Fix this by resetting force to NO_FORCE, that way if we think we need to allocate we can, otherwise we don't force another chunk allocation if one is already happening. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block groupNaohiro Aota
While the active zones within an active block group are reset, and their active resource is released, the block group itself is kept in the active block group list and marked as active. As a result, the list will contain more than max_active_zones block groups. That itself is not fatal for the device as the zones are properly reset. However, that inflated list is, of course, strange. Also, a to-appear patch series, which deactivates an active block group on demand, gets confused with the wrong list. So, fix the issue by finishing the unused block group once it gets read-only, so that we can release the active resource in an early stage. Fixes: be1a1d7a5d24 ("btrfs: zoned: finish fully written block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: avoid double search for block group during NOCOW writesFilipe Manana
When doing a NOCOW write, either through direct IO or buffered IO, we do two lookups for the block group that contains the target extent: once when we call btrfs_inc_nocow_writers() and then later again when we call btrfs_dec_nocow_writers() after creating the ordered extent. The lookups require taking a lock and navigating the red black tree used to track all block groups, which can take a non-negligible amount of time for a large filesystem with thousands of block groups, as well as lock contention and cache line bouncing. Improve on this by having a single block group search: making btrfs_inc_nocow_writers() return the block group to its caller and then have the caller pass that block group to btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(). This is part of a patchset comprised of the following patches: btrfs: remove search start argument from first_logical_byte() btrfs: use rbtree with leftmost node cached for tracking lowest block group btrfs: use a read/write lock for protecting the block groups tree btrfs: return block group directly at btrfs_next_block_group() btrfs: avoid double search for block group during NOCOW writes The following test was used to test these changes from a performance perspective: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash modprobe null_blk nr_devices=0 NULL_DEV_PATH=/sys/kernel/config/nullb/nullb0 mkdir $NULL_DEV_PATH if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Failed to create nullb0 directory." exit 1 fi echo 2 > $NULL_DEV_PATH/submit_queues echo 16384 > $NULL_DEV_PATH/size # 16G echo 1 > $NULL_DEV_PATH/memory_backed echo 1 > $NULL_DEV_PATH/power DEV=/dev/nullb0 MNT=/mnt/nullb0 LOOP_MNT="$MNT/loop" MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd -o nodatacow" MKFS_OPTIONS="-R free-space-tree -O no-holes" cat <<EOF > /tmp/fio-job.ini [io_uring_writes] rw=randwrite fsync=0 fallocate=posix group_reporting=1 direct=1 ioengine=io_uring iodepth=64 bs=64k filesize=1g runtime=300 time_based directory=$LOOP_MNT numjobs=8 thread EOF echo performance | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor echo echo "Using config:" echo cat /tmp/fio-job.ini echo umount $MNT &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT mkdir $LOOP_MNT truncate -s 4T $MNT/loopfile mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $MNT/loopfile &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $MNT/loopfile $LOOP_MNT # Trigger the allocation of about 3500 data block groups, without # actually consuming space on underlying filesystem, just to make # the tree of block group large. fallocate -l 3500G $LOOP_MNT/filler fio /tmp/fio-job.ini umount $LOOP_MNT umount $MNT echo 0 > $NULL_DEV_PATH/power rmdir $NULL_DEV_PATH The test was run on a non-debug kernel (Debian's default kernel config), the result were the following. Before patchset: WRITE: bw=1455MiB/s (1526MB/s), 1455MiB/s-1455MiB/s (1526MB/s-1526MB/s), io=426GiB (458GB), run=300006-300006msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=1503MiB/s (1577MB/s), 1503MiB/s-1503MiB/s (1577MB/s-1577MB/s), io=440GiB (473GB), run=300006-300006msec +3.3% write throughput and +3.3% IO done in the same time period. The test has somewhat limited coverage scope, as with only NOCOW writes we get less contention on the red black tree of block groups, since we don't have the extra contention caused by COW writes, namely when allocating data extents, pinning and unpinning data extents, but on the hand there's access to tree in the NOCOW path, when incrementing a block group's number of NOCOW writers. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: return block group directly at btrfs_next_block_group()Filipe Manana
At btrfs_next_block_group(), we have this long line with two statements: cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(...); return cache; This makes it a bit harder to read due to two statements on the same line, so change that to directly return the result of the call to btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(). Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use a read/write lock for protecting the block groups treeFilipe Manana
Currently we use a spin lock to protect the red black tree that we use to track block groups. Most accesses to that tree are actually read only and for large filesystems, with thousands of block groups, it actually has a bad impact on performance, as concurrent read only searches on the tree are serialized. Read only searches on the tree are very frequent and done when: 1) Pinning and unpinning extents, as we need to lookup the respective block group from the tree; 2) Freeing the last reference of a tree block, regardless if we pin the underlying extent or add it back to free space cache/tree; 3) During NOCOW writes, both buffered IO and direct IO, we need to check if the block group that contains an extent is read only or not and to increment the number of NOCOW writers in the block group. For those operations we need to search for the block group in the tree. Similarly, after creating the ordered extent for the NOCOW write, we need to decrement the number of NOCOW writers from the same block group, which requires searching for it in the tree; 4) Decreasing the number of extent reservations in a block group; 5) When allocating extents and freeing reserved extents; 6) Adding and removing free space to the free space tree; 7) When releasing delalloc bytes during ordered extent completion; 8) When relocating a block group; 9) During fitrim, to iterate over the block groups; 10) etc; Write accesses to the tree, to add or remove block groups, are much less frequent as they happen only when allocating a new block group or when deleting a block group. We also use the same spin lock to protect the list of currently caching block groups. Additions to this list are made when we need to cache a block group, because we don't have a free space cache for it (or we have but it's invalid), and removals from this list are done when caching of the block group's free space finishes. These cases are also not very common, but when they happen, they happen only once when the filesystem is mounted. So switch the lock that protects the tree of block groups from a spinning lock to a read/write lock. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use rbtree with leftmost node cached for tracking lowest block groupFilipe Manana
We keep track of the start offset of the block group with the lowest start offset at fs_info->first_logical_byte. This requires explicitly updating that field every time we add, delete or lookup a block group to/from the red black tree at fs_info->block_group_cache_tree. Since the block group with the lowest start address happens to always be the one that is the leftmost node of the tree, we can use a red black tree that caches the left most node. Then when we need the start address of that block group, we can just quickly get the leftmost node in the tree and extract the start offset of that node's block group. This avoids the need to explicitly keep track of that address in the dedicated member fs_info->first_logical_byte, and it also allows the next patch in the series to switch the lock that protects the red black tree from a spin lock to a read/write lock - without this change it would be tricky because block group searches also update fs_info->first_logical_byte. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: zoned: make auto-reclaim less aggressiveJohannes Thumshirn
The current auto-reclaim algorithm starts reclaiming all block groups with a zone_unusable value above a configured threshold. This is causing a lot of reclaim IO even if there would be enough free zones on the device. Instead of only accounting a block groups zone_unusable value, also take the ratio of free and not usable (written as well as zone_unusable) bytes a device has into account. Tested-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: allow block group background reclaim for non-zoned filesystemsJosef Bacik
This will allow us to set a threshold for block groups to be automatically relocated even if we don't have zoned devices. We have found this feature invaluable at Facebook due to how our workload interacts with the allocator. We have been using this in production for months with only a single problem that has already been fixed. Tested-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: use btrfs_for_each_slot in find_first_block_groupGabriel Niebler
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator macro. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: zoned: activate block group only for extent allocationNaohiro Aota
In btrfs_make_block_group(), we activate the allocated block group, expecting that the block group is soon used for allocation. However, the chunk allocation from flush_space() context broke the assumption. There can be a large time gap between the chunk allocation time and the extent allocation time from the chunk. Activating the empty block groups pre-allocated from flush_space() context can exhaust the active zone counter of a device. Once we use all the active zone counts for empty pre-allocated block groups, we cannot activate new block group for the other things: metadata, tree-log, or data relocation block group. That failure results in a fake -ENOSPC. This patch introduces CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT to distinguish the chunk allocation from find_free_extent(). Now, the new block group is activated only in that context. Fixes: eb66a010d518 ("btrfs: zoned: activate new block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: return allocated block group from do_chunk_alloc()Naohiro Aota
Return the allocated block group from do_chunk_alloc(). This is a preparation patch for the next patch. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-04-06btrfs: remove unused variable in btrfs_{start,write}_dirty_block_groups()Nathan Chancellor
Clang's version of -Wunused-but-set-variable recently gained support for unary operations, which reveals two unused variables: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2949:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int num_started = 0; ^ fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3116:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] int num_started = 0; ^ 2 errors generated. These variables appear to be unused from their introduction, so just remove them to silence the warnings. Fixes: c9dc4c657850 ("Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout") Fixes: 1bbc621ef284 ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1614 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writingNaohiro Aota
There is a hung_task issue with running generic/068 on an SMR device. The hang occurs while a process is trying to thaw the filesystem. The process is trying to take sb->s_umount to thaw the FS. The lock is held by fsstress, which calls btrfs_sync_fs() and is waiting for an ordered extent to finish. However, as the FS is frozen, the ordered extents never finish. Having an ordered extent while the FS is frozen is the root cause of the hang. The ordered extent is initiated from btrfs_relocate_chunk() which is called from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(). This commit adds sb_*_write() around btrfs_relocate_chunk() call site. For the usual "btrfs balance" command, we already call it with mnt_want_file() in btrfs_ioctl_balance(). Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+ Link: https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/56 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add support for multiple global rootsJosef Bacik
With extent tree v2 you will be able to create multiple csum, extent, and free space trees. They will be used based on the block group, which will now use the block_group_item->chunk_objectid to point to the set of global roots that it will use. When allocating new block groups we'll simply mod the gigabyte offset of the block group against the number of global roots we have and that will be the block groups global id. >From there we can take the bytenr that we're modifying in the respective tree, look up the block group and get that block groups corresponding global root id. From there we can get to the appropriate global root for that bytenr. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>