Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
[ Upstream commit 0e90dfa7a8d817db755c7b5d89d77b9c485e4180 ]
I noticed that only port 0 worked on the RTL8366RB since we
started to use custom tags.
It turns out that the format of egress custom tags is actually
different from ingress custom tags. While the lower bits just
contain the port number in ingress tags, egress tags need to
indicate destination port by setting the bit for the
corresponding port.
It was working on port 0 because port 0 added 0x00 as port
number in the lower bits, and if you do this the packet appears
at all ports, including the intended port. Ooops.
Fix this and all ports work again. Use the define for shifting
the "type A" into place while we're at it.
Tested on the D-Link DIR-685 by sending traffic to each of
the ports in turn. It works.
Fixes: 86dd9868b878 ("net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Support also egress tags")
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
Some really really weird switches just couldn't decide whether to use a
normal or a tail tagger, so they just did both.
This creates problems for DSA, because we only have the concept of an
'overhead' which can be applied to the headroom or to the tailroom of
the skb (like for example during the central TX reallocation procedure),
depending on the value of bool tail_tag, but not to both.
We need to generalize DSA to cater for these odd switches by
transforming the 'overhead / tail_tag' pair into 'needed_headroom /
needed_tailroom'.
The DSA master's MTU is increased to account for both.
The flow dissector code is modified such that it only calls the DSA
adjustment callback if the tagger has a non-zero header length.
Taggers are trivially modified to declare either needed_headroom or
needed_tailroom, based on the tail_tag value that they currently
declare.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Modify "Apparantly" to "Apparently" in net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c..
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Commit 86dd9868b878 has several issues, but was accepted too soon
before anyone could take a look.
- Double free. dsa_slave_xmit() will free the skb if the xmit function
returns NULL, but the skb is already freed by eth_skb_pad(). Use
__skb_put_padto() to avoid that.
- Unnecessary allocation. It has been done by DSA core since commit
a3b0b6479700.
- A u16 pointer points to skb data. It should be __be16 for network
byte order.
- Typo in comments. "numer" -> "number".
Fixes: 86dd9868b878 ("net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Support also egress tags")
Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Support also transmitting frames using the custom "8899 A"
4 byte tag.
Qingfang came up with the solution: we need to pad the
ethernet frame to 60 bytes using eth_skb_pad(), then the
switch will happily accept frames with custom tags.
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reported-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Fixes: efd7fe68f0c6 ("net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Remove the .flow_dissect procedure, so the flow dissector will call the
generic variant which works for this tagging protocol.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
There is no tagger that returns anything other than zero, so just change
the return type appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This implements the known parts of the Realtek 4 byte
tag protocol version 0xA, as found in the RTL8366RB
DSA switch.
It is designated as protocol version 0xA as a
different Realtek 4 byte tag format with protocol
version 0x9 is known to exist in the Realtek RTL8306
chips.
The tag and switch chip lacks public documentation, so
the tag format has been reverse-engineered from
packet dumps. As only ingress traffic has been available
for analysis an egress tag has not been possible to
develop (even using educated guesses about bit fields)
so this is as far as it gets. It is not known if the
switch even supports egress tagging.
Excessive attempts to figure out the egress tag format
was made. When nothing else worked, I just tried all bit
combinations with 0xannp where a is protocol and p is
port. I looped through all values several times trying
to get a response from ping, without any positive
result.
Using just these ingress tags however, the switch
functionality is vastly improved and the packets find
their way into the destination port without any
tricky VLAN configuration. On the D-Link DIR-685 the
LAN ports now come up and respond to ping without
any command line configuration so this is a real
improvement for users.
Egress packets need to be restricted to the proper
target ports using VLAN, which the RTL8366RB DSA
switch driver already sets up.
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|