summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-06KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of kvm_timer_flush_hwstateChristoffer Dall
Now when both the vtimer and the ptimer when using both the in-kernel vgic emulation and a userspace IRQ chip are driven by the timer signals and at the vcpu load/put boundaries, instead of recomputing the timer state at every entry/exit to/from the guest, we can get entirely rid of the flush hwstate function. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2017-11-06KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid timer save/restore in vcpu entry/exitChristoffer Dall
We don't need to save and restore the hardware timer state and examine if it generates interrupts on on every entry/exit to the guest. The timer hardware is perfectly capable of telling us when it has expired by signaling interrupts. When taking a vtimer interrupt in the host, we don't want to mess with the timer configuration, we just want to forward the physical interrupt to the guest as a virtual interrupt. We can use the split priority drop and deactivate feature of the GIC to do this, which leaves an EOI'ed interrupt active on the physical distributor, making sure we don't keep taking timer interrupts which would prevent the guest from running. We can then forward the physical interrupt to the VM using the HW bit in the LR of the GIC, like we do already, which lets the guest directly deactivate both the physical and virtual timer simultaneously, allowing the timer hardware to exit the VM and generate a new physical interrupt when the timer output is again asserted later on. We do need to capture this state when migrating VCPUs between physical CPUs, however, which we use the vcpu put/load functions for, which are called through preempt notifiers whenever the thread is scheduled away from the CPU or called directly if we return from the ioctl to userspace. One caveat is that we have to save and restore the timer state in both kvm_timer_vcpu_[put/load] and kvm_timer_[schedule/unschedule], because we can have the following flows: 1. kvm_vcpu_block 2. kvm_timer_schedule 3. schedule 4. kvm_timer_vcpu_put (preempt notifier) 5. schedule (vcpu thread gets scheduled back) 6. kvm_timer_vcpu_load (preempt notifier) 7. kvm_timer_unschedule And a version where we don't actually call schedule: 1. kvm_vcpu_block 2. kvm_timer_schedule 7. kvm_timer_unschedule Since kvm_timer_[schedule/unschedule] may not be followed by put/load, but put/load also may be called independently, we call the timer save/restore functions from both paths. Since they rely on the loaded flag to never save/restore when unnecessary, this doesn't cause any harm, and we ensure that all invokations of either set of functions work as intended. An added benefit beyond not having to read and write the timer sysregs on every entry and exit is that we no longer have to actively write the active state to the physical distributor, because we configured the irq for the vtimer to only get a priority drop when handling the interrupt in the GIC driver (we called irq_set_vcpu_affinity()), and the interrupt stays active after firing on the host. Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-11-06KVM: arm/arm64: Move timer/vgic flush/sync under disabled irqChristoffer Dall
As we are about to play tricks with the timer to be more lazy in saving and restoring state, we need to move the timer sync and flush functions under a disabled irq section and since we have to flush the vgic state after the timer and PMU state, we do the whole flush/sync sequence with disabled irqs. The only downside is a slightly longer delay before being able to process hardware interrupts and run softirqs. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2017-08-08KVM: arm: implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel()Longpeng(Mike)
This implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() for ARM, and adjusts the calls to kvm_vcpu_on_spin(). Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-08-08KVM: add spinlock optimization frameworkLongpeng(Mike)
If a vcpu exits due to request a user mode spinlock, then the spinlock-holder may be preempted in user mode or kernel mode. (Note that not all architectures trap spin loops in user mode, only AMD x86 and ARM/ARM64 currently do). But if a vcpu exits in kernel mode, then the holder must be preempted in kernel mode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernel mode as a more likely candidate for the lock holder. This introduces kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() to decide whether the vcpu is in kernel-mode when it's preempted. kvm_vcpu_on_spin's new argument says the same of the spinning VCPU. Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-06-15KVM: ARM64: fix phy counter access failure in guest.Hu Huajun
When reading the cntpct_el0 in guest with VHE (Virtual Host Extension) enabled in host, the "Unsupported guest sys_reg access" error reported. The reason is cnthctl_el2.EL1PCTEN is not enabled, which is expected to be done in kvm_timer_init_vhe(). The problem is kvm_timer_init_vhe is called by cpu_init_hyp_mode, and which is called when VHE is disabled. This patch remove the incorrect call to kvm_timer_init_vhe() from cpu_init_hyp_mode(), and calls kvm_timer_init_vhe() to enable cnthctl_el2.EL1PCTEN in cpu_hyp_reinit(). Fixes: 488f94d7212b ("KVM: arm64: Access CNTHCTL_EL2 bit fields correctly on VHE systems") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hu Huajun <huhuajun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-06-08KVM: arm/arm64: Disallow userspace control of in-kernel IRQ linesChristoffer Dall
When injecting an IRQ to the VGIC, you now have to present an owner token for that IRQ line to show that you are the owner of that line. IRQ lines driven from userspace or via an irqfd do not have an owner and will simply pass a NULL pointer. Also get rid of the unused kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq prototype. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2017-06-08KVM: arm64: Allow creating the PMU without the in-kernel GICChristoffer Dall
Since we got support for devices in userspace which allows reporting the PMU overflow output status to userspace, we should actually allow creating the PMU on systems without an in-kernel irqchip, which in turn requires us to slightly clarify error codes for the ABI and move things around for the initialization phase. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2017-06-04KVM: arm/arm64: use vcpu requests for irq injectionAndrew Jones
Don't use request-less VCPU kicks when injecting IRQs, as a VCPU kick meant to trigger the interrupt injection could be sent while the VCPU is outside guest mode, which means no IPI is sent, and after it has called kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(), meaning it won't see the updated GIC state until its next exit some time later for some other reason. The receiving VCPU only needs to check this request in VCPU RUN to handle it. By checking it, if it's pending, a memory barrier will be issued that ensures all state is visible. See "Ensuring Requests Are Seen" of Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-06-04KVM: arm/arm64: change exit request to sleep requestAndrew Jones
A request called EXIT is too generic. All requests are meant to cause exits, but different requests have different flags. Let's not make it difficult to decide if the EXIT request is correct for some case by just always providing unique requests for each case. This patch changes EXIT to SLEEP, because that's what the request is asking the VCPU to do. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-06-04KVM: arm/arm64: optimize VCPU RUNAndrew Jones
We can make a small optimization by not checking the state of the power_off field on each run. This is done by treating power_off like pause, only checking it when we get the EXIT VCPU request. When a VCPU powers off another VCPU the EXIT request is already made, so we just need to make sure the request is also made on self power off. kvm_vcpu_kick() isn't necessary for these cases, as the VCPU would just be kicking itself, but we add it anyway as a self kick doesn't cost much, and it makes the code more future-proof. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-06-04KVM: arm/arm64: replace pause checks with vcpu request checksAndrew Jones
The current use of KVM_REQ_VCPU_EXIT for pause is fine. Even the requester clearing the request is OK, as this is the special case where the sole requesting thread and receiving VCPU are executing synchronously (see "Clearing Requests" in Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst) However, that's about to change, so let's ensure only the receiving VCPU clears the request. Additionally, by guaranteeing KVM_REQ_VCPU_EXIT is always set when pause is, we can avoid checking pause directly in VCPU RUN. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-06-04KVM: arm/arm64: properly use vcpu requestsAndrew Jones
arm/arm64 already has one VCPU request used when setting pause, but it doesn't properly check requests in VCPU RUN. Check it and also make sure we set vcpu->mode at the appropriate time (before the check) and with the appropriate barriers. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst. Also make sure we don't leave any vcpu requests we don't intend to handle later set in the request bitmap. If we don't clear them, then kvm_request_pending() may return true when it shouldn't. Using VCPU requests properly fixes a small race where pause could get set just as a VCPU was entering guest mode. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
2017-05-23KVM: arm/arm64: Simplify active_change_prepare and plug raceChristoffer Dall
We don't need to stop a specific VCPU when changing the active state, because private IRQs can only be modified by a running VCPU for the VCPU itself and it is therefore already stopped. However, it is also possible for two VCPUs to be modifying the active state of SPIs at the same time, which can cause the thread being stuck in the loop that checks other VCPU threads for a potentially very long time, or to modify the active state of a running VCPU. Fix this by serializing all accesses to setting and clearing the active state of interrupts using the KVM mutex. Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
2017-05-09Merge tag 'kvm-arm-for-v4.12-round2' of ↵Paolo Bonzini
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD Second round of KVM/ARM Changes for v4.12. Changes include: - A fix related to the 32-bit idmap stub - A fix to the bitmask used to deode the operands of an AArch32 CP instruction - We have moved the files shared between arch/arm/kvm and arch/arm64/kvm to virt/kvm/arm - We add support for saving/restoring the virtual ITS state to userspace
2017-05-09KVM: arm/arm64: Register iodevs when setting redist base and creating VCPUsChristoffer Dall
Instead of waiting with registering KVM iodevs until the first VCPU is run, we can actually create the iodevs when the redist base address is set. The only downside is that we must now also check if we need to do this for VCPUs which are created after creating the VGIC, because there is no enforced ordering between creating the VGIC (and setting its base addresses) and creating the VCPUs. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
2017-05-04KVM: arm/arm64: Move shared files to virt/kvm/armChristoffer Dall
For some time now we have been having a lot of shared functionality between the arm and arm64 KVM support in arch/arm, which not only required a horrible inter-arch reference from the Makefile in arch/arm64/kvm, but also created confusion for newcomers to the code base, as was recently seen on the mailing list. Further, it causes confusion for things like cscope, which needs special attention to index specific shared files for arm64 from the arm tree. Move the shared files into virt/kvm/arm and move the trace points along with it. When moving the tracepoints we have to modify the way the vgic creates definitions of the trace points, so we take the chance to include the VGIC tracepoints in its very own special vgic trace.h file. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>