From 346fa2f891c71a9b98014f8f62c15f4c7dd95ec1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 07:48:25 -0500 Subject: KVM: s390: implement subfunction processor calls While we will not implement interception for query functions yet, we can and should disable functions that have a control bit based on the given CPU model. Let us start with enabling the subfunction interface. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck --- arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/s390') diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h index c5f51566ecd6..3369677a7df7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ struct s390_io_adapter { struct kvm_s390_cpu_model { /* facility mask supported by kvm & hosting machine */ __u64 fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64]; + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc subfuncs; /* facility list requested by guest (in dma page) */ __u64 *fac_list; u64 cpuid; diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index 2e47c724679e..82a95afa6629 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -1266,11 +1266,20 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_feat(struct kvm *kvm, static int kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { - /* - * Once supported by kernel + hw, we have to store the subfunctions - * in kvm->arch and remember that user space configured them. - */ - return -ENXIO; + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + if (kvm->created_vcpus) { + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return -EBUSY; + } + + if (copy_from_user(&kvm->arch.model.subfuncs, (void __user *)attr->addr, + sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc))) { + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return -EFAULT; + } + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + + return 0; } static int kvm_s390_set_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) @@ -1389,12 +1398,11 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_machine_feat(struct kvm *kvm, static int kvm_s390_get_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { - /* - * Once we can actually configure subfunctions (kernel + hw support), - * we have to check if they were already set by user space, if so copy - * them from kvm->arch. - */ - return -ENXIO; + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs, + sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc))) + return -EFAULT; + + return 0; } static int kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, @@ -1405,6 +1413,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, return -EFAULT; return 0; } + static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { int ret = -ENXIO; @@ -1522,10 +1531,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_FEAT: case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_FEAT: case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC: + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: ret = 0; break; - /* configuring subfunctions is not supported yet */ - case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: default: ret = -ENXIO; break; @@ -2227,6 +2235,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) kvm->arch.model.fac_list[i] = S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list[i] & kvm_s390_fac_base[i]; } + kvm->arch.model.subfuncs = kvm_s390_available_subfunc; /* we are always in czam mode - even on pre z14 machines */ set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 138); -- cgit v1.2.3