From 636b8fe86bede8c9f797365986b8406ff2183f13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Angelo Ruocco Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:35:34 +0200 Subject: block, bfq: fix some typos in comments Some of the comments in the bfq files had typos. This patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Angelo Ruocco Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/bfq-iosched.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.h') diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 60c148728cc5..e7dc07cf9a57 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct bfq_service_tree { * expiration. This peculiar definition allows for the following * optimization, not yet exploited: while a given entity is still in * service, we already know which is the best candidate for next - * service among the other active entitities in the same parent + * service among the other active entities in the same parent * entity. We can then quickly compare the timestamps of the * in-service entity with those of such best candidate. * @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ struct bfq_weight_counter { * * Unless cgroups are used, the weight value is calculated from the * ioprio to export the same interface as CFQ. When dealing with - * ``well-behaved'' queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much + * "well-behaved" queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much * time to consume their budget and have true sequential behavior, and * when there are no external factors breaking anticipation) the * relative weights at each level of the cgroups hierarchy should be -- cgit v1.2.3