From 019c088dc403448aa29e8650c551baa1e5e29e0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Clemens Gruber Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:52:50 +0100 Subject: pwm: pca9685: Fix period change with same duty cycle commit 8d254a340efb12b40c4c1ff25a48a4f48f7bbd6b upstream. When first implementing support for changing the output frequency, an optimization was added to continue the PWM after changing the prescaler without having to reprogram the ON and OFF registers for the duty cycle, in case the duty cycle stayed the same. This was flawed, because we compared the absolute value of the duty cycle in nanoseconds instead of the ratio to the period. Fix the problem by removing the shortcut. Fixes: 01ec8472009c9 ("pwm-pca9685: Support changing the output frequency") Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/pwm') diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c index 117fccf7934a..01a6a83f625d 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ #define PCA9685_MAXCHAN 0x10 #define LED_FULL (1 << 4) -#define MODE1_RESTART (1 << 7) #define MODE1_SLEEP (1 << 4) #define MODE2_INVRT (1 << 4) #define MODE2_OUTDRV (1 << 2) @@ -117,16 +116,6 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, udelay(500); pca->period_ns = period_ns; - - /* - * If the duty cycle did not change, restart PWM with - * the same duty cycle to period ratio and return. - */ - if (duty_ns == pca->duty_ns) { - regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, - MODE1_RESTART, 0x1); - return 0; - } } else { dev_err(chip->dev, "prescaler not set: period out of bounds!\n"); -- cgit v1.2.3