From e6a13c753f912564256d81f7036f9c524b1ef8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:33:50 -0500 Subject: signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig [ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ] The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that exits or execs (as sighand may change). The is not a locking problem in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous exceptions. Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the delivery of the signal. The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being delivered. So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing and pointless. Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig. Cc: Namjae Jeon Cc: Jeff Layton Cc: Steve French Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"") Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c index 7e85070d010f..a59dcda07534 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ cifs_put_tcp_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int from_reconnect) task = xchg(&server->tsk, NULL); if (task) - force_sig(SIGKILL, task); + send_sig(SIGKILL, task, 1); } static struct TCP_Server_Info * -- cgit v1.2.3