From 1b67772e4e3f16cd647b229cae95fc06d120be08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:21:06 -0800 Subject: bpf,lsm: Refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free LSM hooks Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command. This will give LSMs as much information as we can basically provide. The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF verification step. bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and signatures. Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one *even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their relative ordering. Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd1876 ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it should not be an issue anymore. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Paul Moore Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-10-andrii@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c index e8e910395bf6..7ee0dd011de4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c @@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_alloc_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_load) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_check_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committing_creds) @@ -358,8 +360,7 @@ BTF_SET_END(sleepable_lsm_hooks) BTF_SET_START(untrusted_lsm_hooks) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security) -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_alloc_security) -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free_security) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_alloc_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_free_security) #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK -- cgit v1.2.3 From a2431c7eabcf9bd5a1e7a1f7ecded40fdda4a8c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:21:07 -0800 Subject: bpf,lsm: Refactor bpf_map_alloc/bpf_map_free LSM hooks Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs. Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which seems to be a sweet spot. But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the outcome. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Paul Moore Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-11-andrii@kernel.org --- include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 5 +++-- include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++-- kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 6 +++--- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++-- security/security.c | 16 ++++++++++------ security/selinux/hooks.c | 7 ++++--- 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c') diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h index 370181aa685b..1be4d3ca6efb 100644 --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h @@ -404,8 +404,9 @@ LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, audit_rule_free, void *lsmrule) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog, struct bpf_prog *prog) -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_alloc_security, struct bpf_map *map) -LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free_security, struct bpf_map *map) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_map_create, struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) +LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free, struct bpf_map *map) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog_load, struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token) LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_prog_free, struct bpf_prog *prog) diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index cb2932fce448..83fcdc974116 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -2069,7 +2069,8 @@ struct bpf_token; extern int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size); extern int security_bpf_map(struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode); extern int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog); -extern int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map); +extern int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token); extern void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map); extern int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token); @@ -2091,7 +2092,8 @@ static inline int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog) return 0; } -static inline int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map) +static inline int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) { return 0; } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c index 7ee0dd011de4..76976908b302 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) BTF_SET_START(sleepable_lsm_hooks) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map) -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_alloc_security) -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_create) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_load) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free) @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_userns_create) BTF_SET_END(sleepable_lsm_hooks) BTF_SET_START(untrusted_lsm_hooks) -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free_security) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_alloc_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_free_security) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 3857a2a9ae7f..b2750b79ac80 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1318,9 +1318,9 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr) attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id; } - err = security_bpf_map_alloc(map); + err = security_bpf_map_create(map, attr, token); if (err) - goto free_map; + goto free_map_sec; err = bpf_map_alloc_id(map); if (err) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index eb159da4b146..26fcab35b6cd 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -5410,16 +5410,20 @@ int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog) } /** - * security_bpf_map_alloc() - Allocate a bpf map LSM blob - * @map: bpf map + * security_bpf_map_create() - Check if BPF map creation is allowed + * @map: BPF map object + * @attr: BPF syscall attributes used to create BPF map + * @token: BPF token used to grant user access * - * Initialize the security field inside bpf map. + * Do a check when the kernel creates a new BPF map. This is also the + * point where LSM blob is allocated for LSMs that need them. * * Return: Returns 0 on success, error on failure. */ -int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map) +int security_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) { - return call_int_hook(bpf_map_alloc_security, 0, map); + return call_int_hook(bpf_map_create, 0, map, attr, token); } /** @@ -5448,7 +5452,7 @@ int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, */ void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map) { - call_void_hook(bpf_map_free_security, map); + call_void_hook(bpf_map_free, map); } /** diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 6d64fb189b1b..3d336a7952f7 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -6920,7 +6920,8 @@ static int selinux_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog) BPF__PROG_RUN, NULL); } -static int selinux_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map) +static int selinux_bpf_map_create(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct bpf_token *token) { struct bpf_security_struct *bpfsec; @@ -7325,7 +7326,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __ro_after_init = { LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf, selinux_bpf), LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map, selinux_bpf_map), LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog, selinux_bpf_prog), - LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_free_security, selinux_bpf_map_free), + LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_free, selinux_bpf_map_free), LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog_free, selinux_bpf_prog_free), #endif @@ -7383,7 +7384,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __ro_after_init = { LSM_HOOK_INIT(audit_rule_init, selinux_audit_rule_init), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL - LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_alloc_security, selinux_bpf_map_alloc), + LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_map_create, selinux_bpf_map_create), LSM_HOOK_INIT(bpf_prog_load, selinux_bpf_prog_load), #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS -- cgit v1.2.3 From f568a3d49af9aed813a184353592efe29b0e3d16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:21:08 -0800 Subject: bpf,lsm: Add BPF token LSM hooks Wire up bpf_token_create and bpf_token_free LSM hooks, which allow to allocate LSM security blob (we add `void *security` field to struct bpf_token for that), but also control who can instantiate BPF token. This follows existing pattern for BPF map and BPF prog. Also add security_bpf_token_allow_cmd() and security_bpf_token_capable() LSM hooks that allow LSM implementation to control and negate (if necessary) BPF token's delegation of a specific bpf_cmd and capability, respectively. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Paul Moore Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-12-andrii@kernel.org --- include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++ include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 5 ++++ include/linux/security.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 4 +++ kernel/bpf/token.c | 12 ++++++++- security/security.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c') diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 4e146e9708be..b86bd15a051d 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1634,6 +1634,9 @@ struct bpf_token { u64 allowed_maps; u64 allowed_progs; u64 allowed_attachs; +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY + void *security; +#endif }; struct bpf_struct_ops_value; diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h index 1be4d3ca6efb..cd6fbc7af3f8 100644 --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h @@ -410,6 +410,11 @@ LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_map_free, struct bpf_map *map) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_prog_load, struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token) LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_prog_free, struct bpf_prog *prog) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_token_create, struct bpf_token *token, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct path *path) +LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bpf_token_free, struct bpf_token *token) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_token_cmd, const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_cmd cmd) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bpf_token_capable, const struct bpf_token *token, int cap) #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, locked_down, enum lockdown_reason what) diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 83fcdc974116..15804af54f37 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include struct linux_binprm; @@ -2075,6 +2076,11 @@ extern void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map); extern int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_token *token); extern void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *prog); +extern int security_bpf_token_create(struct bpf_token *token, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct path *path); +extern void security_bpf_token_free(struct bpf_token *token); +extern int security_bpf_token_cmd(const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_cmd cmd); +extern int security_bpf_token_capable(const struct bpf_token *token, int cap); #else static inline int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) @@ -2109,6 +2115,25 @@ static inline int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr * static inline void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *prog) { } + +static inline int security_bpf_token_create(struct bpf_token *token, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct path *path) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void security_bpf_token_free(struct bpf_token *token) +{ } + +static inline int security_bpf_token_cmd(const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_cmd cmd) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline int security_bpf_token_capable(const struct bpf_token *token, int cap) +{ + return 0; +} #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */ #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c index 76976908b302..63b4dc495125 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c @@ -265,6 +265,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_map_free) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_load) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_prog_free) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_token_create) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_token_free) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_token_cmd) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bpf_token_capable) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_check_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committing_creds) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/token.c b/kernel/bpf/token.c index c13c73788d8c..64c568f47f69 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/token.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/token.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include static bool bpf_ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) { @@ -21,6 +22,8 @@ bool bpf_token_capable(const struct bpf_token *token, int cap) userns = token ? token->userns : &init_user_ns; if (!bpf_ns_capable(userns, cap)) return false; + if (token && security_bpf_token_capable(token, cap) < 0) + return false; return true; } @@ -31,6 +34,7 @@ void bpf_token_inc(struct bpf_token *token) static void bpf_token_free(struct bpf_token *token) { + security_bpf_token_free(token); put_user_ns(token->userns); kfree(token); } @@ -193,6 +197,10 @@ int bpf_token_create(union bpf_attr *attr) token->allowed_progs = mnt_opts->delegate_progs; token->allowed_attachs = mnt_opts->delegate_attachs; + err = security_bpf_token_create(token, attr, &path); + if (err) + goto out_token; + fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC); if (fd < 0) { err = fd; @@ -237,7 +245,9 @@ bool bpf_token_allow_cmd(const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_cmd cmd) { if (!token) return false; - return token->allowed_cmds & (1ULL << cmd); + if (!(token->allowed_cmds & (1ULL << cmd))) + return false; + return security_bpf_token_cmd(token, cmd) == 0; } bool bpf_token_allow_map_type(const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_map_type type) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 26fcab35b6cd..73e009e3d937 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -5444,6 +5444,55 @@ int security_bpf_prog_load(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr, return call_int_hook(bpf_prog_load, 0, prog, attr, token); } +/** + * security_bpf_token_create() - Check if creating of BPF token is allowed + * @token: BPF token object + * @attr: BPF syscall attributes used to create BPF token + * @path: path pointing to BPF FS mount point from which BPF token is created + * + * Do a check when the kernel instantiates a new BPF token object from BPF FS + * instance. This is also the point where LSM blob can be allocated for LSMs. + * + * Return: Returns 0 on success, error on failure. + */ +int security_bpf_token_create(struct bpf_token *token, union bpf_attr *attr, + struct path *path) +{ + return call_int_hook(bpf_token_create, 0, token, attr, path); +} + +/** + * security_bpf_token_cmd() - Check if BPF token is allowed to delegate + * requested BPF syscall command + * @token: BPF token object + * @cmd: BPF syscall command requested to be delegated by BPF token + * + * Do a check when the kernel decides whether provided BPF token should allow + * delegation of requested BPF syscall command. + * + * Return: Returns 0 on success, error on failure. + */ +int security_bpf_token_cmd(const struct bpf_token *token, enum bpf_cmd cmd) +{ + return call_int_hook(bpf_token_cmd, 0, token, cmd); +} + +/** + * security_bpf_token_capable() - Check if BPF token is allowed to delegate + * requested BPF-related capability + * @token: BPF token object + * @cap: capabilities requested to be delegated by BPF token + * + * Do a check when the kernel decides whether provided BPF token should allow + * delegation of requested BPF-related capabilities. + * + * Return: Returns 0 on success, error on failure. + */ +int security_bpf_token_capable(const struct bpf_token *token, int cap) +{ + return call_int_hook(bpf_token_capable, 0, token, cap); +} + /** * security_bpf_map_free() - Free a bpf map's LSM blob * @map: bpf map @@ -5465,6 +5514,17 @@ void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *prog) { call_void_hook(bpf_prog_free, prog); } + +/** + * security_bpf_token_free() - Free a BPF token's LSM blob + * @token: BPF token struct + * + * Clean up the security information stored inside BPF token. + */ +void security_bpf_token_free(struct bpf_token *token) +{ + call_void_hook(bpf_token_free, token); +} #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */ /** -- cgit v1.2.3 From 1581e5118e485e82cfb5d04d636a79aaefb6f266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Bobrowski Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:43:40 +0000 Subject: bpf: Minor clean-up to sleepable_lsm_hooks BTF set There's already one main CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK ifdef block within the sleepable_lsm_hooks BTF set. Consolidate this duplicated ifdef block as there's no need for it and all things guarded by it should remain in one place in this specific context. Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zbt1smz43GDMbVU3@google.com --- kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c index 63b4dc495125..68240c3c6e7d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c @@ -282,10 +282,6 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_lock) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_open) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_receive) -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK -BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inet_conn_established) -#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */ - BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_create) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_free_security) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_getattr) @@ -336,6 +332,8 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_sb_umount) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_settime) #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inet_conn_established) + BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_socket_accept) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_socket_bind) BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_socket_connect) -- cgit v1.2.3