From 228f1d0018ba6b24c9f718a97a5bc35b24f1e1e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:00 +0800 Subject: workqueue: remove @wakeup from worker_set_flags() worker_set_flags() has only two callers, each specifying %true and %false for @wakeup. Let's push the wake up to the caller and remove @wakeup from worker_set_flags(). The caller can use the following instead if wakeup is necessary: worker_set_flags(); if (need_more_worker(pool)) wake_up_worker(pool); This makes the code simpler. This patch doesn't introduce behavior changes. tj: Updated description and comments. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 33 +++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c') diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index c20cfbe89194..54efc68f656e 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -867,35 +867,22 @@ struct task_struct *wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *task, int cpu) * worker_set_flags - set worker flags and adjust nr_running accordingly * @worker: self * @flags: flags to set - * @wakeup: wakeup an idle worker if necessary * - * Set @flags in @worker->flags and adjust nr_running accordingly. If - * nr_running becomes zero and @wakeup is %true, an idle worker is - * woken up. + * Set @flags in @worker->flags and adjust nr_running accordingly. * * CONTEXT: * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) */ -static inline void worker_set_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags, - bool wakeup) +static inline void worker_set_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags) { struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool; WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->task != current); - /* - * If transitioning into NOT_RUNNING, adjust nr_running and - * wake up an idle worker as necessary if requested by - * @wakeup. - */ + /* If transitioning into NOT_RUNNING, adjust nr_running. */ if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) && !(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) { - if (wakeup) { - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->nr_running) && - !list_empty(&pool->worklist)) - wake_up_worker(pool); - } else - atomic_dec(&pool->nr_running); + atomic_dec(&pool->nr_running); } worker->flags |= flags; @@ -2041,18 +2028,20 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock) list_del_init(&work->entry); /* - * CPU intensive works don't participate in concurrency - * management. They're the scheduler's responsibility. + * CPU intensive works don't participate in concurrency management. + * They're the scheduler's responsibility. This takes @worker out + * of concurrency management and the next code block will chain + * execution of the pending work items. */ if (unlikely(cpu_intensive)) - worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE, true); + worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE); /* * Wake up another worker if necessary. The condition is always * false for normal per-cpu workers since nr_running would always * be >= 1 at this point. This is used to chain execution of the * pending work items for WORKER_NOT_RUNNING workers such as the - * UNBOUND ones. + * UNBOUND and CPU_INTENSIVE ones. */ if (need_more_worker(pool)) wake_up_worker(pool); @@ -2210,7 +2199,7 @@ recheck: } } while (keep_working(pool)); - worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false); + worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP); sleep: /* * pool->lock is held and there's no work to process and no need to -- cgit v1.2.3