From ec6347bb43395cb92126788a1a5b25302543f815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:40:16 -0700 Subject: x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Acked-by: Michael Ellerman Cc: Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com --- tools/objtool/check.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/objtool') diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c index e034a8f24f46..893f021fec63 100644 --- a/tools/objtool/check.c +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c @@ -548,8 +548,8 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = { "__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds", /* misc */ "csum_partial_copy_generic", - "__memcpy_mcsafe", - "mcsafe_handle_tail", + "copy_mc_fragile", + "copy_mc_fragile_handle_tail", "ftrace_likely_update", /* CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING */ NULL }; -- cgit v1.2.3