From 0253e0590e2dc46996534371d56b5297099aed4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:50:05 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops(). Create a new struct_ops type called bpf_testmod_ops within the bpf_testmod module. When a struct_ops object is registered, the bpf_testmod module will invoke test_2 from the module. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119225005.668602-15-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e44ac55195ca --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ +#include +#include +#include +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +int test_2_result = 0; + +SEC("struct_ops/test_1") +int BPF_PROG(test_1) +{ + return 0xdeadbeef; +} + +SEC("struct_ops/test_2") +int BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) +{ + test_2_result = a + b; + return a + b; +} + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { + .test_1 = (void *)test_1, + .test_2 = (void *)test_2, +}; + -- cgit v1.2.3 From 169e650069647325496e5a65408ff301874c8e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 22:12:04 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Suppress warning message of an unused variable. "r" is used to receive the return value of test_2 in bpf_testmod.c, but it is not actually used. So, we remove "r" and change the return type to "void". Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401300557.z5vzn8FM-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204061204.1864529-1-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 ++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 4754c662b39f..a06daebc75c9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -554,9 +554,8 @@ static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_testmod_verifier_ops = { static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata) { struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata; - int r; - r = ops->test_2(4, 3); + ops->test_2(4, 3); return 0; } @@ -570,9 +569,8 @@ static int bpf_testmod_test_1(void) return 0; } -static int bpf_testmod_test_2(int a, int b) +static void bpf_testmod_test_2(int a, int b) { - return 0; } static struct bpf_testmod_ops __bpf_testmod_ops = { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index ca5435751c79..537beca42896 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq { struct bpf_testmod_ops { int (*test_1)(void); - int (*test_2)(int a, int b); + void (*test_2)(int a, int b); }; #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c index e44ac55195ca..b78746b3cef3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -16,10 +16,9 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_1) } SEC("struct_ops/test_2") -int BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) +void BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) { test_2_result = a + b; - return a + b; } SEC(".struct_ops.link") -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0623e73317940d052216fb6eef4efd55a0a7f602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:45:23 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Test if shadow types work correctly. Change the values of fields, including scalar types and function pointers, and check if the struct_ops map works as expected. The test changes the field "test_2" of "testmod_1" from the pointer to test_2() to pointer to test_3() and the field "data" to 13. The function test_2() and test_3() both compute a new value for "test_2_result", but in different way. By checking the value of "test_2_result", it ensures the struct_ops map works as expected with changes through shadow types. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240229064523.2091270-6-thinker.li@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 11 ++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 8 ++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 8 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 66787e99ba1b..098ddd067224 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -539,6 +539,15 @@ static int bpf_testmod_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t, const struct btf_member *member, void *kdata, const void *udata) { + if (member->offset == offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops, data) * 8) { + /* For data fields, this function has to copy it and return + * 1 to indicate that the data has been handled by the + * struct_ops type, or the verifier will reject the map if + * the value of the data field is not zero. + */ + ((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)kdata)->data = ((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)udata)->data; + return 1; + } return 0; } @@ -559,7 +568,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata) * initialized, so we need to check for NULL. */ if (ops->test_2) - ops->test_2(4, 3); + ops->test_2(4, ops->data); return 0; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index c3b0cf788f9f..971458acfac3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops { void (*test_2)(int a, int b); /* Used to test nullable arguments. */ int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task); + + /* The following fields are used to test shadow copies. */ + char onebyte; + struct { + int a; + int b; + } unsupported; + int data; }; #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c index 8d833f0c7580..7d6facf46ebb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c @@ -32,17 +32,23 @@ cleanup: static void test_struct_ops_load(void) { - DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); struct struct_ops_module *skel; struct bpf_map_info info = {}; struct bpf_link *link; int err; u32 len; - skel = struct_ops_module__open_opts(&opts); + skel = struct_ops_module__open(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open")) return; + skel->struct_ops.testmod_1->data = 13; + skel->struct_ops.testmod_1->test_2 = skel->progs.test_3; + /* Since test_2() is not being used, it should be disabled from + * auto-loading, or it will fail to load. + */ + bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_2, false); + err = struct_ops_module__load(skel); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_module_load")) goto cleanup; @@ -56,8 +62,13 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void) link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1); ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1"); - /* test_2() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */ - ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 7, "test_2_result"); + /* test_3() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c + * + * In bpf_testmod.c it will pass 4 and 13 (the value of data) to + * .test_2. So, the value of test_2_result should be 20 (4 + 13 + + * 3). + */ + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 20, "check_shadow_variables"); bpf_link__destroy(link); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c index b78746b3cef3..25952fa09348 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -21,9 +21,17 @@ void BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) test_2_result = a + b; } +SEC("struct_ops/test_3") +int BPF_PROG(test_3, int a, int b) +{ + test_2_result = a + b + 3; + return a + b + 3; +} + SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { .test_1 = (void *)test_1, .test_2 = (void *)test_2, + .data = 0x1, }; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5bab7a277ca8d4ef377a50a6678577b5bd7f74d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:45:18 +0200 Subject: selftests/bpf: Test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use '___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: David Vernet Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-5-eddyz87@gmail.com --- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 2 ++ .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++------ .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 21 +++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 098ddd067224..b9b488d6d53a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -564,6 +564,8 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata) { struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata; + if (ops->test_1) + ops->test_1(); /* Some test cases (ex. struct_ops_maybe_null) may not have test_2 * initialized, so we need to check for NULL. */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c index 7d6facf46ebb..ee5372c7f2c7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c @@ -30,11 +30,29 @@ cleanup: close(fd); } +static int attach_ops_and_check(struct struct_ops_module *skel, + struct bpf_map *map, + int expected_test_2_result) +{ + struct bpf_link *link; + + link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(map); + ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1"); + if (!link) + return -1; + + /* test_{1,2}() would be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */ + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_1_result, 0xdeadbeef, "test_1_result"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, expected_test_2_result, "test_2_result"); + + bpf_link__destroy(link); + return 0; +} + static void test_struct_ops_load(void) { struct struct_ops_module *skel; struct bpf_map_info info = {}; - struct bpf_link *link; int err; u32 len; @@ -59,20 +77,17 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void) if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_get_info_by_fd")) goto cleanup; - link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1); - ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1"); - + check_map_info(&info); /* test_3() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c * * In bpf_testmod.c it will pass 4 and 13 (the value of data) to * .test_2. So, the value of test_2_result should be 20 (4 + 13 + * 3). */ - ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 20, "check_shadow_variables"); - - bpf_link__destroy(link); - - check_map_info(&info); + if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_1, 20)) + goto cleanup; + if (!attach_ops_and_check(skel, skel->maps.testmod_2, 12)) + goto cleanup; cleanup: struct_ops_module__destroy(skel); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c index 25952fa09348..026cabfa7f1f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; +int test_1_result = 0; int test_2_result = 0; SEC("struct_ops/test_1") int BPF_PROG(test_1) { - return 0xdeadbeef; + test_1_result = 0xdeadbeef; + return 0; } SEC("struct_ops/test_2") @@ -35,3 +37,20 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { .data = 0x1, }; +SEC("struct_ops/test_2") +void BPF_PROG(test_2_v2, int a, int b) +{ + test_2_result = a * b; +} + +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 { + int (*test_1)(void); + void (*test_2)(int a, int b); + int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task); +}; + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = { + .test_1 = (void *)test_1, + .test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2, +}; -- cgit v1.2.3