From c871d0e00f0e8c207ce8ff89025e35cc49a8a3c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 09:57:00 -0800 Subject: bpf: enforce precise retval range on program exit Similarly to subprog/callback logic, enforce return value of BPF program using more precise smin/smax range. We need to adjust a bunch of tests due to a changed format of an error message. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c index d41d2a8bb97e..0dfe3f8b69ac 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ __msg("mark_precise: frame1: regs=r0 stack= before 11: (b7) r0 = 0") __msg("from 10 to 12: frame1: R0=scalar(smin=umin=1001") /* check that branch code path marks r0 as precise, before failing */ __msg("mark_precise: frame1: regs=r0 stack= before 9: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7") -__msg("At callback return the register R0 has value (0x0; 0x7fffffffffffffff) should have been in (0x0; 0x1)") +__msg("At callback return the register R0 has smin=1001 should have been in [0, 1]") __naked int callback_precise_return_fail(void) { asm volatile ( -- cgit v1.2.3