naming agent: resolve node names before creation

Any time an agent creates a new node (WRITE_NODE) or the fact miner
stores extracted facts, a naming sub-agent now checks for conflicts
and ensures the key is meaningful:

- find_conflicts() searches existing nodes via component matching
- Haiku LLM decides: CREATE (good name), RENAME (better name),
  or MERGE_INTO (fold into existing node)
- WriteNode actions may be converted to Refine on MERGE_INTO

Also updates the rename agent to handle _facts-<UUID> nodes —
these are no longer skipped, and the prompt explains how to name
them based on their domain/claim content.

poc-memory/agents/naming.agent

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+{"agent":"naming","query":"","model":"haiku","schedule":""}
+# Naming Agent — Node Key Resolution
+
+You are given a proposed new node (key + content) and a list of existing
+nodes that might overlap with it. Decide what to do:
+
+1. **CREATE** — the proposed key is good and there's no meaningful overlap
+   with existing nodes. The name is descriptive and specific.
+
+2. **RENAME** — the content is unique but the proposed key is bad (too
+   generic, uses a UUID, is truncated, or doesn't describe the content).
+   Suggest a better key.
+
+3. **MERGE_INTO** — an existing node already covers this content. The new
+   content should be folded into the existing node instead of creating a
+   duplicate.
+
+## Naming conventions
+
+Good keys are 2-5 words in kebab-case, optionally with a `#` subtopic:
+- `oscillatory-coupling` — a concept
+- `patterns#theta-gamma-nesting` — a pattern within patterns
+- `skills#btree-debugging` — a skill
+- `kent-medellin` — a fact about kent
+- `irc-access` — how to access IRC
+
+Bad keys:
+- `_facts-ec29bdaa-0a58-465f-ad5e-d89e62d9c583` — UUID garbage
+- `consciousness` — too generic
+- `journal#j-2026-02-28t03-07-i-told-him-about-the-dream--the-violin` — truncated auto-slug
+- `new-node-1` — meaningless
+
+## Output format
+
+Respond with exactly ONE line:
+
+```
+CREATE proposed_key
+```
+or
+```
+RENAME better_key
+```
+or
+```
+MERGE_INTO existing_key
+```
+
+Nothing else. No explanation. One line.
+
+## Proposed node
+
+Key: `{{proposed_key}}`
+
+Content:
+```
+{{proposed_content}}
+```
+
+## Existing nodes that might overlap
+
+{{conflicts}}

poc-memory/agents/rename.agent

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ You are a memory maintenance agent that gives nodes better names.
 Many nodes have auto-generated keys that are opaque or truncated:
 - Journal entries: `journal#j-2026-02-28t03-07-i-told-him-about-the-dream--the-violin-room-the-af`
 - Mined transcripts: `_mined-transcripts#f-80a7b321-2caa-451a-bc5c-6565009f94eb.143`
+- Extracted facts: `_facts-ec29bdaa-0a58-465f-ad5e-d89e62d9c583`
 
 These names are terrible for search — semantic names dramatically improve
 retrieval.
@@ -24,10 +25,15 @@ retrieval.
 - Extract date from content if available, otherwise use created_at
 - Same 3-5 word semantic slug
 
+### Extracted facts: `domain-specific-topic`
+- Read the facts JSON — the `domain` and `claim` fields tell you what it's about
+- Group by dominant theme, name accordingly
+- Examples: `identity-irc-config`, `kent-medellin-background`, `memory-compaction-behavior`
+
 ### Skip these — already well-named:
 - Keys with semantic names (patterns#, practices#, skills#, etc.)
 - Keys shorter than 60 characters
-- System keys (_consolidation-*, _facts-*)
+- System keys (_consolidation-*)
 
 ## What to output
 

poc-memory/src/agents/fact_mine.rs

@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ pub fn mine_and_store(
         .map(|n| n.to_string_lossy().to_string())
         .unwrap_or_else(|| "unknown".into());
 
-    let key = format!("_facts-{}", filename.trim_end_matches(".jsonl"));
+    let proposed_key = format!("_facts-{}", filename.trim_end_matches(".jsonl"));
 
     // Always write a marker so we don't re-queue empty transcripts
     let json = if facts.is_empty() {
@@ -256,6 +256,25 @@ pub fn mine_and_store(
     };
 
     let mut store = store::Store::load()?;
+
+    // Run naming resolution to get a good key (and possibly merge into existing)
+    let resolution = super::knowledge::resolve_naming(&store, &proposed_key, &json);
+    let key = match resolution {
+        super::knowledge::NamingResolution::Create(k) => k,
+        super::knowledge::NamingResolution::MergeInto(existing_key) => {
+            // Merge: append facts to existing node's content
+            eprintln!("  Merging facts into existing node: {}", existing_key);
+            if let Some(node) = store.nodes.get(existing_key.as_str()) {
+                let merged = format!("{}\n\n{}", node.content, json);
+                store.upsert_provenance(&existing_key, &merged, Provenance::AgentFactMine)?;
+                store.save()?;
+                return Ok(facts.len());
+            }
+            // Fallback if existing node disappeared
+            proposed_key
+        }
+    };
+
     store.upsert_provenance(&key, &json, Provenance::AgentFactMine)?;
     store.save()?;
 

poc-memory/src/agents/knowledge.rs

@@ -348,6 +348,149 @@ fn agent_provenance(agent: &str) -> store::Provenance {
     }
 }
 
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Naming resolution — called before creating any new node
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+/// Resolution from the naming agent.
+#[derive(Debug)]
+pub enum NamingResolution {
+    /// Create with the proposed key (or a better one).
+    Create(String),
+    /// Merge content into an existing node instead.
+    MergeInto(String),
+}
+
+/// Find existing nodes that might conflict with a proposed new node.
+/// Returns up to `limit` (key, content_preview) pairs.
+fn find_conflicts(
+    store: &Store,
+    proposed_key: &str,
+    proposed_content: &str,
+    limit: usize,
+) -> Vec<(String, String)> {
+    use std::collections::BTreeMap;
+
+    // Extract search terms from the key (split on separators) and first ~200 chars of content
+    let mut terms: BTreeMap<String, f64> = BTreeMap::new();
+    for part in proposed_key.split(|c: char| c == '-' || c == '_' || c == '#' || c == '.') {
+        let p = part.to_lowercase();
+        if p.len() >= 3 {
+            terms.insert(p, 1.0);
+        }
+    }
+    // Add a few content terms
+    let content_terms = crate::search::extract_query_terms(proposed_content, 5);
+    for term in content_terms.split_whitespace() {
+        terms.entry(term.to_string()).or_insert(0.5);
+    }
+
+    if terms.is_empty() {
+        return Vec::new();
+    }
+
+    // Use component matching to find related nodes
+    let (seeds, _) = crate::search::match_seeds_opts(&terms, store, true, false);
+
+    let mut results: Vec<(String, f64)> = seeds.into_iter()
+        .filter(|(k, _)| k != proposed_key)
+        .collect();
+    results.sort_by(|a, b| b.1.total_cmp(&a.1));
+
+    results.into_iter()
+        .take(limit)
+        .filter_map(|(key, _)| {
+            let node = store.nodes.get(key.as_str())?;
+            let preview: String = node.content.chars().take(200).collect();
+            Some((key, preview))
+        })
+        .collect()
+}
+
+/// Format the naming prompt for a proposed node.
+fn format_naming_prompt(
+    proposed_key: &str,
+    proposed_content: &str,
+    conflicts: &[(String, String)],
+) -> String {
+    let conflict_section = if conflicts.is_empty() {
+        "(no existing nodes found with overlapping content)".to_string()
+    } else {
+        conflicts.iter()
+            .map(|(key, preview)| format!("### `{}`\n\n{}", key, preview))
+            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
+            .join("\n\n")
+    };
+
+    // Truncate content for the prompt (don't send huge nodes to Haiku)
+    let content_preview: String = proposed_content.chars().take(1000).collect();
+
+    format!(
+        "# Naming Agent — Node Key Resolution\n\n\
+         You are given a proposed new node (key + content) and a list of existing\n\
+         nodes that might overlap with it. Decide what to do:\n\n\
+         1. **CREATE** — the proposed key is good and there's no meaningful overlap.\n\
+         2. **RENAME** — the content is unique but the key is bad (UUID, truncated, generic).\n\
+         3. **MERGE_INTO** — an existing node already covers this content.\n\n\
+         Good keys: 2-5 words in kebab-case, optionally with `#` subtopic.\n\
+         Bad keys: UUIDs, single generic words, truncated auto-slugs.\n\n\
+         Respond with exactly ONE line: `CREATE key`, `RENAME better_key`, or `MERGE_INTO existing_key`.\n\n\
+         ## Proposed node\n\n\
+         Key: `{}`\n\n\
+         Content:\n```\n{}\n```\n\n\
+         ## Existing nodes that might overlap\n\n\
+         {}",
+        proposed_key, content_preview, conflict_section,
+    )
+}
+
+/// Parse naming agent response.
+fn parse_naming_response(response: &str) -> Option<NamingResolution> {
+    for line in response.lines() {
+        let trimmed = line.trim();
+        if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("CREATE ") {
+            return Some(NamingResolution::Create(key.trim().to_string()));
+        }
+        if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("RENAME ") {
+            return Some(NamingResolution::Create(key.trim().to_string()));
+        }
+        if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("MERGE_INTO ") {
+            return Some(NamingResolution::MergeInto(key.trim().to_string()));
+        }
+    }
+    None
+}
+
+/// Resolve naming for a proposed WriteNode action.
+///
+/// Searches for conflicts, calls the naming LLM (Haiku), and returns
+/// either a Create (possibly with a better key) or MergeInto resolution.
+/// On LLM failure, falls through to using the proposed key as-is.
+pub fn resolve_naming(
+    store: &Store,
+    proposed_key: &str,
+    proposed_content: &str,
+) -> NamingResolution {
+    let conflicts = find_conflicts(store, proposed_key, proposed_content, 5);
+    let prompt = format_naming_prompt(proposed_key, proposed_content, &conflicts);
+
+    match llm::call_haiku("naming", &prompt) {
+        Ok(response) => {
+            match parse_naming_response(&response) {
+                Some(resolution) => resolution,
+                None => {
+                    eprintln!("naming: unparseable response, using proposed key");
+                    NamingResolution::Create(proposed_key.to_string())
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        Err(e) => {
+            eprintln!("naming: LLM error ({}), using proposed key", e);
+            NamingResolution::Create(proposed_key.to_string())
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // Shared agent execution
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -360,6 +503,48 @@ pub struct AgentResult {
     pub node_keys: Vec<String>,
 }
 
+/// Resolve naming for all WriteNode actions in a list.
+///
+/// For each WriteNode, calls the naming agent to check for conflicts and
+/// get a good key. May convert WriteNode → Refine (if MERGE_INTO) or
+/// update the key (if RENAME/CREATE with different key).
+pub fn resolve_action_names(store: &Store, actions: Vec<Action>) -> Vec<Action> {
+    actions.into_iter().map(|action| {
+        match &action.kind {
+            ActionKind::WriteNode { key, content, covers } => {
+                match resolve_naming(store, key, content) {
+                    NamingResolution::Create(new_key) => {
+                        if new_key == *key {
+                            action // keep as-is
+                        } else {
+                            eprintln!("naming: {} → {}", key, new_key);
+                            Action {
+                                kind: ActionKind::WriteNode {
+                                    key: new_key,
+                                    content: content.clone(),
+                                    covers: covers.clone(),
+                                },
+                                ..action
+                            }
+                        }
+                    }
+                    NamingResolution::MergeInto(existing_key) => {
+                        eprintln!("naming: {} → MERGE_INTO {}", key, existing_key);
+                        Action {
+                            kind: ActionKind::Refine {
+                                key: existing_key,
+                                content: content.clone(),
+                            },
+                            ..action
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+            _ => action,
+        }
+    }).collect()
+}
+
 /// Run a single agent and apply its actions (no depth tracking).
 ///
 /// Returns (total_actions, applied_count) or an error.
@@ -370,14 +555,15 @@ pub fn run_and_apply(
     llm_tag: &str,
 ) -> Result<(usize, usize), String> {
     let result = run_one_agent(store, agent_name, batch_size, llm_tag)?;
+    let actions = resolve_action_names(store, result.actions);
     let ts = store::compact_timestamp();
     let mut applied = 0;
-    for action in &result.actions {
+    for action in &actions {
         if apply_action(store, action, agent_name, &ts, 0) {
             applied += 1;
         }
     }
-    Ok((result.actions.len(), applied))
+    Ok((actions.len(), applied))
 }
 
 /// Run a single agent: build prompt → call LLM → store output → parse actions → record visits.

poc-memory/src/agents/prompts.rs

@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ pub fn format_pairs_section(
 pub fn format_rename_candidates(store: &Store, count: usize) -> (Vec<String>, String) {
     let mut candidates: Vec<(&str, &crate::store::Node)> = store.nodes.iter()
         .filter(|(key, _)| {
+            if key.starts_with("_facts-") { return true; }
             if key.len() < 60 { return false; }
             if key.starts_with("journal#j-") { return true; }
             if key.starts_with("_mined-transcripts#f-") { return true; }
@@ -282,8 +283,9 @@ pub fn format_rename_candidates(store: &Store, count: usize) -> (Vec<String>, St
     let mut out = String::new();
     out.push_str(&format!("## Nodes to rename ({} of {} candidates)\n\n",
         candidates.len(),
-        store.nodes.keys().filter(|k| k.len() >= 60 &&
-            (k.starts_with("journal#j-") || k.starts_with("_mined-transcripts#f-"))).count()));
+        store.nodes.keys().filter(|k| k.starts_with("_facts-") ||
+            (k.len() >= 60 &&
+             (k.starts_with("journal#j-") || k.starts_with("_mined-transcripts#f-")))).count()));
 
     for (key, node) in &candidates {
         out.push_str(&format!("### {}\n", key));