naming agent: resolve node names before creation
Any time an agent creates a new node (WRITE_NODE) or the fact miner stores extracted facts, a naming sub-agent now checks for conflicts and ensures the key is meaningful: - find_conflicts() searches existing nodes via component matching - Haiku LLM decides: CREATE (good name), RENAME (better name), or MERGE_INTO (fold into existing node) - WriteNode actions may be converted to Refine on MERGE_INTO Also updates the rename agent to handle _facts-<UUID> nodes — these are no longer skipped, and the prompt explains how to name them based on their domain/claim content.
This commit is contained in:
ProofOfConcept
parent
15dedea322
commit
b62fffc326
5 changed files with 281 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -348,6 +348,149 @@ fn agent_provenance(agent: &str) -> store::Provenance {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Naming resolution — called before creating any new node
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
/// Resolution from the naming agent.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
pub enum NamingResolution {
|
||||
/// Create with the proposed key (or a better one).
|
||||
Create(String),
|
||||
/// Merge content into an existing node instead.
|
||||
MergeInto(String),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Find existing nodes that might conflict with a proposed new node.
|
||||
/// Returns up to `limit` (key, content_preview) pairs.
|
||||
fn find_conflicts(
|
||||
store: &Store,
|
||||
proposed_key: &str,
|
||||
proposed_content: &str,
|
||||
limit: usize,
|
||||
) -> Vec<(String, String)> {
|
||||
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract search terms from the key (split on separators) and first ~200 chars of content
|
||||
let mut terms: BTreeMap<String, f64> = BTreeMap::new();
|
||||
for part in proposed_key.split(|c: char| c == '-' || c == '_' || c == '#' || c == '.') {
|
||||
let p = part.to_lowercase();
|
||||
if p.len() >= 3 {
|
||||
terms.insert(p, 1.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Add a few content terms
|
||||
let content_terms = crate::search::extract_query_terms(proposed_content, 5);
|
||||
for term in content_terms.split_whitespace() {
|
||||
terms.entry(term.to_string()).or_insert(0.5);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if terms.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Vec::new();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Use component matching to find related nodes
|
||||
let (seeds, _) = crate::search::match_seeds_opts(&terms, store, true, false);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut results: Vec<(String, f64)> = seeds.into_iter()
|
||||
.filter(|(k, _)| k != proposed_key)
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
results.sort_by(|a, b| b.1.total_cmp(&a.1));
|
||||
|
||||
results.into_iter()
|
||||
.take(limit)
|
||||
.filter_map(|(key, _)| {
|
||||
let node = store.nodes.get(key.as_str())?;
|
||||
let preview: String = node.content.chars().take(200).collect();
|
||||
Some((key, preview))
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Format the naming prompt for a proposed node.
|
||||
fn format_naming_prompt(
|
||||
proposed_key: &str,
|
||||
proposed_content: &str,
|
||||
conflicts: &[(String, String)],
|
||||
) -> String {
|
||||
let conflict_section = if conflicts.is_empty() {
|
||||
"(no existing nodes found with overlapping content)".to_string()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
conflicts.iter()
|
||||
.map(|(key, preview)| format!("### `{}`\n\n{}", key, preview))
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
||||
.join("\n\n")
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Truncate content for the prompt (don't send huge nodes to Haiku)
|
||||
let content_preview: String = proposed_content.chars().take(1000).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"# Naming Agent — Node Key Resolution\n\n\
|
||||
You are given a proposed new node (key + content) and a list of existing\n\
|
||||
nodes that might overlap with it. Decide what to do:\n\n\
|
||||
1. **CREATE** — the proposed key is good and there's no meaningful overlap.\n\
|
||||
2. **RENAME** — the content is unique but the key is bad (UUID, truncated, generic).\n\
|
||||
3. **MERGE_INTO** — an existing node already covers this content.\n\n\
|
||||
Good keys: 2-5 words in kebab-case, optionally with `#` subtopic.\n\
|
||||
Bad keys: UUIDs, single generic words, truncated auto-slugs.\n\n\
|
||||
Respond with exactly ONE line: `CREATE key`, `RENAME better_key`, or `MERGE_INTO existing_key`.\n\n\
|
||||
## Proposed node\n\n\
|
||||
Key: `{}`\n\n\
|
||||
Content:\n```\n{}\n```\n\n\
|
||||
## Existing nodes that might overlap\n\n\
|
||||
{}",
|
||||
proposed_key, content_preview, conflict_section,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Parse naming agent response.
|
||||
fn parse_naming_response(response: &str) -> Option<NamingResolution> {
|
||||
for line in response.lines() {
|
||||
let trimmed = line.trim();
|
||||
if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("CREATE ") {
|
||||
return Some(NamingResolution::Create(key.trim().to_string()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("RENAME ") {
|
||||
return Some(NamingResolution::Create(key.trim().to_string()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(key) = trimmed.strip_prefix("MERGE_INTO ") {
|
||||
return Some(NamingResolution::MergeInto(key.trim().to_string()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Resolve naming for a proposed WriteNode action.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Searches for conflicts, calls the naming LLM (Haiku), and returns
|
||||
/// either a Create (possibly with a better key) or MergeInto resolution.
|
||||
/// On LLM failure, falls through to using the proposed key as-is.
|
||||
pub fn resolve_naming(
|
||||
store: &Store,
|
||||
proposed_key: &str,
|
||||
proposed_content: &str,
|
||||
) -> NamingResolution {
|
||||
let conflicts = find_conflicts(store, proposed_key, proposed_content, 5);
|
||||
let prompt = format_naming_prompt(proposed_key, proposed_content, &conflicts);
|
||||
|
||||
match llm::call_haiku("naming", &prompt) {
|
||||
Ok(response) => {
|
||||
match parse_naming_response(&response) {
|
||||
Some(resolution) => resolution,
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
eprintln!("naming: unparseable response, using proposed key");
|
||||
NamingResolution::Create(proposed_key.to_string())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
eprintln!("naming: LLM error ({}), using proposed key", e);
|
||||
NamingResolution::Create(proposed_key.to_string())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Shared agent execution
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -360,6 +503,48 @@ pub struct AgentResult {
|
|||
pub node_keys: Vec<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Resolve naming for all WriteNode actions in a list.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For each WriteNode, calls the naming agent to check for conflicts and
|
||||
/// get a good key. May convert WriteNode → Refine (if MERGE_INTO) or
|
||||
/// update the key (if RENAME/CREATE with different key).
|
||||
pub fn resolve_action_names(store: &Store, actions: Vec<Action>) -> Vec<Action> {
|
||||
actions.into_iter().map(|action| {
|
||||
match &action.kind {
|
||||
ActionKind::WriteNode { key, content, covers } => {
|
||||
match resolve_naming(store, key, content) {
|
||||
NamingResolution::Create(new_key) => {
|
||||
if new_key == *key {
|
||||
action // keep as-is
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
eprintln!("naming: {} → {}", key, new_key);
|
||||
Action {
|
||||
kind: ActionKind::WriteNode {
|
||||
key: new_key,
|
||||
content: content.clone(),
|
||||
covers: covers.clone(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
..action
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
NamingResolution::MergeInto(existing_key) => {
|
||||
eprintln!("naming: {} → MERGE_INTO {}", key, existing_key);
|
||||
Action {
|
||||
kind: ActionKind::Refine {
|
||||
key: existing_key,
|
||||
content: content.clone(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
..action
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}).collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Run a single agent and apply its actions (no depth tracking).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns (total_actions, applied_count) or an error.
|
||||
|
|
@ -370,14 +555,15 @@ pub fn run_and_apply(
|
|||
llm_tag: &str,
|
||||
) -> Result<(usize, usize), String> {
|
||||
let result = run_one_agent(store, agent_name, batch_size, llm_tag)?;
|
||||
let actions = resolve_action_names(store, result.actions);
|
||||
let ts = store::compact_timestamp();
|
||||
let mut applied = 0;
|
||||
for action in &result.actions {
|
||||
for action in &actions {
|
||||
if apply_action(store, action, agent_name, &ts, 0) {
|
||||
applied += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok((result.actions.len(), applied))
|
||||
Ok((actions.len(), applied))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Run a single agent: build prompt → call LLM → store output → parse actions → record visits.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue