New command: `poc-memory agent run <agent> [--count N] [--dry-run]`
Runs a single agent by name through the full pipeline (build prompt,
call LLM, apply actions). With --dry-run, sets POC_MEMORY_DRY_RUN=1
so all mutations are no-ops but the agent can still read the graph.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The LCG was producing only 2 distinct matchup pairs due to poor
constants. Switch to xorshift32 for proper coverage of all type pairs.
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Replace sort-based ranking with proper Elo system:
- Each agent TYPE has a persistent Elo rating (agent-elo.json)
- Each matchup: pick two random types, grab a recent action from
each, LLM compares, update ratings
- Ratings persist across daily evaluations — natural recency bias
from continuous updates against current opponents
- K=32 for fast adaptation to prompt changes
Usage: poc-memory agent evaluate --matchups 30 --model haiku
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
TIE causes inconsistency in sort (A=B, B=C but A>C breaks ordering).
Force the comparator to always pick a winner. Default to A if response
is unparseable.
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Use CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR for agent file path (same as defs.rs)
- Dedup affected nodes extracted from reports
- --dry-run shows example comparison prompt without LLM calls
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Chain-of-thought: "say which is better and why" forces clearer
judgment and gives us analysis data for improving agents.
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When both actions are from the same agent, show the instructions once
and just compare the two report outputs + affected nodes. Saves tokens
and makes the comparison cleaner.
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Each comparison now shows the LLM:
- Agent instructions (the .agent prompt file)
- Report output (what the agent did)
- Affected nodes content (what it changed)
The comparator sees intent, action, and impact — can judge whether
a deletion was correct, whether links are meaningful, whether
WRITE_NODEs capture real insights.
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Yes, really. Rust's stdlib sort_by with an LLM pairwise comparator.
Each comparison is an API call asking "which action was better?"
Sample N actions per agent type, throw them all in a Vec, sort.
Where each agent's samples cluster = that agent's quality score.
Reports per-type average rank and quality ratio.
Supports both haiku (fast/cheap) and sonnet (quality) as comparator.
Usage: poc-memory agent evaluate --samples 5 --model haiku
Co-Authored-By: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
