summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-10-25 23:11:47 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-10-25 23:11:47 -0700
commitfdf457871e7c070416403efd1533ba49adc20a87 (patch)
treefdf22af5765c1f3c2e0c31b61f25e4e249459a20 /arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
parentf3c51fe02c55bd944662714e5b91b96dc271ad9f (diff)
parent387b532138eed5b12e1afa68cafb6a389507310f (diff)
Merge branch 'bpf: Avoid unnecessary deadlock detection and failure in task storage'
Martin KaFai Lau says: ==================== From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> The commit bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]") added deadlock detection to avoid a tracing program from recurring on the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}() helpers. These helpers acquire a spin lock and it will lead to deadlock. It is unnecessary for the bpf_lsm and bpf_iter programs which do not recur. The situation is the same as the existing bpf_pid_task_storage_{lookup,delete}_elem() which are used in the syscall and they also do not have deadlock detection. This set is to add new bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}() helper proto without the deadlock detection. The set also removes the prog->active check from the bpf_lsm and bpf_iter program. Please see the individual patch for details. ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c9
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 30f76178608b..62f805f427b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1649,13 +1649,8 @@ static void invoke_bpf_prog(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_link *l,
struct bpf_prog *p = l->link.prog;
int cookie_off = offsetof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx, bpf_cookie);
- if (p->aux->sleepable) {
- enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable;
- exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit_sleepable;
- } else {
- enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter;
- exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit;
- }
+ enter_prog = (u64)bpf_trampoline_enter(p);
+ exit_prog = (u64)bpf_trampoline_exit(p);
if (l->cookie == 0) {
/* if cookie is zero, one instruction is enough to store it */