diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-10-07 16:04:19 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-10-07 16:04:19 -0700 |
commit | eda57a0e42998d1d403187844faa86c9a3ab2fd0 (patch) | |
tree | fd49b5f7b3c6dfb5cdd49ec8bed967d387452c3c /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | c512c69187197fe08026cb5bbe7b9709f4f89b73 (diff) | |
parent | 59bb47985c1db229ccff8c5deebecd54fc77d2a9 (diff) |
Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
Merge misc fixes from Andrew Morton:
"The usual shower of hotfixes.
Chris's memcg patches aren't actually fixes - they're mature but a few
niggling review issues were late to arrive.
The ocfs2 fixes are quite old - those took some time to get reviewer
attention.
Subsystems affected by this patch series: ocfs2, hotfixes, mm/memcg,
mm/slab-generic"
* emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
mm, sl[aou]b: guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc(power-of-two)
mm, sl[ou]b: improve memory accounting
mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection
mm, memcg: make memory.emin the baseline for utilisation determination
mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim
mm/vmpressure.c: fix a signedness bug in vmpressure_register_event()
mm/page_alloc.c: fix a crash in free_pages_prepare()
mm/z3fold.c: claim page in the beginning of free
kernel/sysctl.c: do not override max_threads provided by userspace
memcg: only record foreign writebacks with dirty pages when memcg is not disabled
mm: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings
writeback: fix use-after-free in finish_writeback_work()
mm/memremap: drop unused SECTION_SIZE and SECTION_MASK
panic: ensure preemption is disabled during panic()
fs: ocfs2: fix a possible null-pointer dereference in ocfs2_info_scan_inode_alloc()
fs: ocfs2: fix a possible null-pointer dereference in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()
fs: ocfs2: fix possible null-pointer dereferences in ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry()
ocfs2: clear zero in unaligned direct IO
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 72 |
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index e5d52d6a24af..c6659bb758a4 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2459,17 +2459,70 @@ out: *lru_pages = 0; for_each_evictable_lru(lru) { int file = is_file_lru(lru); - unsigned long size; + unsigned long lruvec_size; unsigned long scan; + unsigned long protection; + + lruvec_size = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, lru, sc->reclaim_idx); + protection = mem_cgroup_protection(memcg, + sc->memcg_low_reclaim); + + if (protection) { + /* + * Scale a cgroup's reclaim pressure by proportioning + * its current usage to its memory.low or memory.min + * setting. + * + * This is important, as otherwise scanning aggression + * becomes extremely binary -- from nothing as we + * approach the memory protection threshold, to totally + * nominal as we exceed it. This results in requiring + * setting extremely liberal protection thresholds. It + * also means we simply get no protection at all if we + * set it too low, which is not ideal. + * + * If there is any protection in place, we reduce scan + * pressure by how much of the total memory used is + * within protection thresholds. + * + * There is one special case: in the first reclaim pass, + * we skip over all groups that are within their low + * protection. If that fails to reclaim enough pages to + * satisfy the reclaim goal, we come back and override + * the best-effort low protection. However, we still + * ideally want to honor how well-behaved groups are in + * that case instead of simply punishing them all + * equally. As such, we reclaim them based on how much + * memory they are using, reducing the scan pressure + * again by how much of the total memory used is under + * hard protection. + */ + unsigned long cgroup_size = mem_cgroup_size(memcg); + + /* Avoid TOCTOU with earlier protection check */ + cgroup_size = max(cgroup_size, protection); + + scan = lruvec_size - lruvec_size * protection / + cgroup_size; + + /* + * Minimally target SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages to keep + * reclaim moving forwards, avoiding decremeting + * sc->priority further than desirable. + */ + scan = max(scan, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); + } else { + scan = lruvec_size; + } + + scan >>= sc->priority; - size = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, lru, sc->reclaim_idx); - scan = size >> sc->priority; /* * If the cgroup's already been deleted, make sure to * scrape out the remaining cache. */ if (!scan && !mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) - scan = min(size, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); + scan = min(lruvec_size, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX); switch (scan_balance) { case SCAN_EQUAL: @@ -2489,7 +2542,7 @@ out: case SCAN_ANON: /* Scan one type exclusively */ if ((scan_balance == SCAN_FILE) != file) { - size = 0; + lruvec_size = 0; scan = 0; } break; @@ -2498,7 +2551,7 @@ out: BUG(); } - *lru_pages += size; + *lru_pages += lruvec_size; nr[lru] = scan; } } @@ -2742,6 +2795,13 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW); break; case MEMCG_PROT_NONE: + /* + * All protection thresholds breached. We may + * still choose to vary the scan pressure + * applied based on by how much the cgroup in + * question has exceeded its protection + * thresholds (see get_scan_count). + */ break; } |