summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c61
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index 705f1a390e31..0f197516d708 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdesc.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
@@ -87,7 +89,13 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs(void)
pr_warn("No ACPI PMU IRQ for CPU%d\n", cpu);
}
+ /*
+ * Log and request the IRQ so the core arm_pmu code can manage
+ * it. We'll have to sanity-check IRQs later when we associate
+ * them with their PMUs.
+ */
per_cpu(pmu_irqs, cpu) = irq;
+ armpmu_request_irq(irq, cpu);
}
return 0;
@@ -127,7 +135,7 @@ static struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu_acpi_find_alloc_pmu(void)
return pmu;
}
- pmu = armpmu_alloc();
+ pmu = armpmu_alloc_atomic();
if (!pmu) {
pr_warn("Unable to allocate PMU for CPU%d\n",
smp_processor_id());
@@ -140,6 +148,35 @@ static struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu_acpi_find_alloc_pmu(void)
}
/*
+ * Check whether the new IRQ is compatible with those already associated with
+ * the PMU (e.g. we don't have mismatched PPIs).
+ */
+static bool pmu_irq_matches(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int irq)
+{
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!irq)
+ return true;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
+ if (!other_irq)
+ continue;
+
+ if (irq == other_irq)
+ continue;
+ if (!irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && !irq_is_percpu_devid(other_irq))
+ continue;
+
+ pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
* This must run before the common arm_pmu hotplug logic, so that we can
* associate a CPU and its interrupt before the common code tries to manage the
* affinity and so on.
@@ -164,19 +201,14 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
if (!pmu)
return -ENOMEM;
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus);
-
per_cpu(probed_pmus, cpu) = pmu;
- /*
- * Log and request the IRQ so the core arm_pmu code can manage it. In
- * some situations (e.g. mismatched PPIs), we may fail to request the
- * IRQ. However, it may be too late for us to do anything about it.
- * The common ARM PMU code will log a warning in this case.
- */
- hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
- per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu) = irq;
- armpmu_request_irq(pmu, cpu);
+ if (pmu_irq_matches(pmu, irq)) {
+ hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
+ per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu) = irq;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus);
/*
* Ideally, we'd probe the PMU here when we find the first matching
@@ -247,11 +279,6 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_init(void)
if (acpi_disabled)
return 0;
- /*
- * We can't request IRQs yet, since we don't know the cookie value
- * until we know which CPUs share the same logical PMU. We'll handle
- * that in arm_pmu_acpi_cpu_starting().
- */
ret = arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs();
if (ret)
return ret;